Limelight Forums

Full Version: Should teachers be listed on team page?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

ForceGhost

(Feb 23, 2017, 09:23 PM)Innovative Wrote: [ -> ]Last time I checked contributors weren't the subject of this discussion, so let's keep it that way.

Why? It's relevant to the issue,

if teachers aren't on the team page, why are contributors when neither were or are part of the staff team?
(Feb 23, 2017, 10:21 AM)Wishy Wooshy Wrote: [ -> ]Y'know, the tab is literally called "Team". So while yes teachers might not do as much works as say, contributors or developers they are still part of the team! They do a role within Limelight Gaming, they represent the community on a daily basis on the Server and on the Forums.

So the argument "They don't do enough" or "It will make them powermad" is insane. And maybe the fact they even bothered to apply should be of some recognition because they took the initiative and decided to make a difference in the community. Now I know some of you said that technically anyone could do it. but the point is; They don't.

Whether you like it or not Teachers are part of the Limelight team, so taking a 2 dimensional look at everything as most people here do is probably the reason people have issues with the Staff team in the first place.

Everyone has a role within the community. This is invalid, because donators also represent the community, and so do regular players. Hell, they ARE the community you know. Being a teacher is not staff, and it is nothing special that they would rank themselves above a donator because they are not anything more than a donator. They are players just like you.

Powermad is not insane. Not at all. I understand where people think that the concept is harmless, and that it doesn't mean anything. However as someone who has been backstage, more so than others for sure. I can tell you that there's a lot more that can go on with these issues than you'd believe. So yes, it actually is an issue and it has been in the past.
Please see my previous post regarding Contributors and why they're not relevant in this discussion. Please stay on topic, as this discussion is regarding Teachers.
This entire debacle has devolved into a fight over who deserves a sticker or not.
I think everyone deserves recognition while I also have come to agree that having
the teachers on the team page is not the way to go, the alternatives Faustie presented
are appealing imo.

Having a Hall Of Fame and just listing people worth giving recognition if they did their
part to help LL in some way then just put them there and have a team page with all
current active duty admins/mods/devs
Nah people just went off topic completely and started pointing fingers elsewhere when they had nothing else to argue.
-sigh-

Faustie proposed a nice idea. It's the best of both worlds. for both sides of the table.

How about we just have the tabs on the top bar, one leads to the staff page, so is renamed from "Team" to "Staff".

We have another that leads to the HOF for Vets, I dunno if it'd be a redirect to a thread, a page, or perhaps a clone teampage.php file.

And we have a final tab that says something to indicate teachers/contributors, and same thing as above.

Thats just my thoughts.
(Feb 23, 2017, 09:23 PM)Innovative Wrote: [ -> ]Last time I checked contributors weren't the subject of this discussion, so let's keep it that way.

I don't see how it would affect anyone if contributors were moved from the team page and put in another with us (teachers), after all both ranks are volunteers. Your work is still acknowledged in a page in the forums with just an additional click away. Remember you are work is also permanently rewarded by your name being added on the F1 menu as a token of appreciation.

OT: In my opinion I would like if the team page was split into three. Staff team, Volunteers, Hall of fame.
It leaves everyone happy while still officially acknowledging teachers next to the rest of the teams.

As for the wider subject here, yes I could probably do the exact same thing I am doing right now without being a teacher, but by taking up this position I put myself up so people can receive help at anytime, even if I don't feel like it, the second a help call comes in we will be there to assist, at no point do we ignore a call. Yes, we volunteer and yes I have no "special" powers but we too spend hundreds upon hundreds of hours helping new people so admins have less to do and be able to assist you faster.

It is wrong to think because we have "not enough" power we shouldn't be acknowledged for what we do everyday. We have no powers to be approachable to players but at the same time we have a direct line to admins in order to correctly answer your calls without them having to go through them.

tl;dr
We are not staff(duh), that aside we still contribute our time and knowledge, I don't see how it would hurt limelight, if we had a place in the team page (which is not the staff page) even if that means splitting the page in three parts?

Side note;
If you want players to be (feel) equal to teachers then there is only one solution, terminate the teacher program. There is no inbetween on this. Any rank you may make, it will give off the feeling of inequality (ex. Why is the guy X rank and not me/you/us?). Coming to think of it, even the community is split into two unequal parts (Donors - Members), should we remove donor tag or give members a tag of their to feel "equal"? No.

You shouldn't aim to make teachers be equal to the rest. The community won't feel comfortable because we are equal in terms of power but because they know we are there to help them and answer all of their questions without making fun of them.

We are supposed to be the most approachable people in limelight and still give you an correct, double-checked answer. Approachable isn't achieved by being equal with others but having the qualities mentioned above.
(Feb 23, 2017, 10:56 PM)Project Wrote: [ -> ]Side note;
If you want players to be (feel) equal to teachers then there is only one solution, terminate the teacher program. There is no inbetween on this. Any rank you may make, it will give off the feeling of inequality (ex. Why is the guy X rank and not me/you/us?). Coming to think of it, even the community is split into two unequal parts (Donors - Members), should we remove donor tag or give members a tag of their to feel "equal"? No.

You shouldn't aim to make teachers be equal to the rest. The community won't feel comfortable because we are equal in terms of power but because they know we are there to help them and answer all of their questions without making fun of them.

We are supposed to be the most approachable people in limelight and still give you an correct, double-checked answer. Approachable isn't achieved by being equal with others but having the qualities mentioned above.

Thing is, you'll find that if Teachers are put above donators you'll find out quicker than ever that those traits you speak of will disappear. Trust me.
Most people are moaning about how they are not staff etc. This is more of the question of "Should they be on the Team page. Not staff. So eh
(Feb 23, 2017, 11:46 PM)Preditor Wrote: [ -> ]
(Feb 23, 2017, 10:56 PM)Project Wrote: [ -> ]Side note;
If you want players to be (feel) equal to teachers then there is only one solution, terminate the teacher program. There is no inbetween on this. Any rank you may make, it will give off the feeling of inequality (ex. Why is the guy X rank and not me/you/us?). Coming to think of it, even the community is split into two unequal parts (Donors - Members), should we remove donor tag or give members a tag of their to feel "equal"? No.

You shouldn't aim to make teachers be equal to the rest. The community won't feel comfortable because we are equal in terms of power but because they know we are there to help them and answer all of their questions without making fun of them.

We are supposed to be the most approachable people in limelight and still give you an correct, double-checked answer. Approachable isn't achieved by being equal with others but having the qualities mentioned above.

Thing is, you'll find that if Teachers are put above donators you'll find out quicker than ever that those traits you speak of will disappear. Trust me.

Mind expanding on this?
(Feb 24, 2017, 12:16 AM)Project Wrote: [ -> ]
(Feb 23, 2017, 11:46 PM)Preditor Wrote: [ -> ]
(Feb 23, 2017, 10:56 PM)Project Wrote: [ -> ]Side note;
If you want players to be (feel) equal to teachers then there is only one solution, terminate the teacher program. There is no inbetween on this. Any rank you may make, it will give off the feeling of inequality (ex. Why is the guy X rank and not me/you/us?). Coming to think of it, even the community is split into two unequal parts (Donors - Members), should we remove donor tag or give members a tag of their to feel "equal"? No.

You shouldn't aim to make teachers be equal to the rest. The community won't feel comfortable because we are equal in terms of power but because they know we are there to help them and answer all of their questions without making fun of them.

We are supposed to be the most approachable people in limelight and still give you an correct, double-checked answer. Approachable isn't achieved by being equal with others but having the qualities mentioned above.

Thing is, you'll find that if Teachers are put above donators you'll find out quicker than ever that those traits you speak of will disappear. Trust me.

Mind expanding on this?

For the sake of secrecy and not leaking my word is all I can give you, Sorry.
(Feb 24, 2017, 12:46 AM)Preditor Wrote: [ -> ]
(Feb 24, 2017, 12:16 AM)Project Wrote: [ -> ]
(Feb 23, 2017, 11:46 PM)Preditor Wrote: [ -> ]
(Feb 23, 2017, 10:56 PM)Project Wrote: [ -> ]Side note;
If you want players to be (feel) equal to teachers then there is only one solution, terminate the teacher program. There is no inbetween on this. Any rank you may make, it will give off the feeling of inequality (ex. Why is the guy X rank and not me/you/us?). Coming to think of it, even the community is split into two unequal parts (Donors - Members), should we remove donor tag or give members a tag of their to feel "equal"? No.

You shouldn't aim to make teachers be equal to the rest. The community won't feel comfortable because we are equal in terms of power but because they know we are there to help them and answer all of their questions without making fun of them.

We are supposed to be the most approachable people in limelight and still give you an correct, double-checked answer. Approachable isn't achieved by being equal with others but having the qualities mentioned above.

Thing is, you'll find that if Teachers are put above donators you'll find out quicker than ever that those traits you speak of will disappear. Trust me.

Mind expanding on this?

For the sake of secrecy and not leaking my word is all I can give you, Sorry.

Understood.

Thing is all teams will have bad apples, if someone cannot hold on the traits he showed to have when he was taken in the team he should simply be removed from it. 
Distrusting all of us (teachers) for something a few have done is two steps back. I believe the teacher team as of now can handle the powers the old one had once. You could always trial a change and if it is not working out then you just go back to what has been working all along. 
Straight out saying no and denying any attempt to see if issues are actually going to come up is not going to get us anywhere.
I have been apart of the teacher program, I've seen majority of the people in the teacher team. Personally, I don't think teachers should be on the team page. I have gotten this opinion from personal experience when being on the teacher team. When they're (not pointing fingers) given certain things/powers, they tend to act more like admins/staff. This is something I have seen happen multiple times.

The teachers are not meant to be anything different to the average donators, personally, adding them to the team page would draw a rather large line between the player and the teacher ranks. Now, I've noticed many people mention contributors. Now, I was the person who got them added to the team page. The contributors do a lot of additions to the gamemode/servers. I am not saying the teachers do not do stuff, but they do not do as much as the contributors. Helping people is not as hard as something such as coding.
(Feb 24, 2017, 12:59 AM)Brynn Wrote: [ -> ]I have been apart of the teacher program, I've seen majority of the people in the teacher team. Personally, I don't think teachers should be on the team page. I have gotten this opinion from personal experience when being on the teacher team. When they're (not pointing fingers) given certain things/powers, they tend to act more like admins/staff. This is something I have seen happen multiple times.

See post above.



The teachers are not meant to be anything different to the average donators,

Yet we only accept the best limelight has to offer? Most of the time teachers are being looked upon as better than the average player because of their capabilities even before they are even promoted.



personally, adding them to the team page would draw a rather large line between the player and the teacher ranks.

How exactly? Because we are acknowledged that we are a team that is voluntarily assisting limelight?



Now, I've noticed many people mention contributors. Now, I was the person who got them added to the team page.The contributors do a lot of additions to the gamemode/servers.

It was brought up at the start, like teachers, they volunteer their skills for free, much like I volunteer using my time to teach players or organize events. Contributors are already credited on the F1 menu about their work and we are not talking about removing them but either putting us next to them or create a page where all volunteer team are shown.



I am not saying the teachers do not do stuff, but they do not do as much as the contributors. Helping people is not as hard as something such as coding.

Correct me if wrong but no one said we are doing something more difficult, I will say though we are doing something as important as coding updates. By giving new players a helping hand we give them a bigger chance of staying on LL, while taking a call the staff team would ignore and actually investing time in it.
(Feb 24, 2017, 01:29 AM)Project Wrote: [ -> ]Yet we only accept the best limelight has to offer? Most of the time teachers are being looked upon as better than the average player because of their capabilities even before they are even promoted.


This is the point, Teachers being looked upon 'better than the average player'.

EDIT:
The fact they think they are better than the 'average player' is what is concerning.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12