Login
Sign Up


You are using the mobile version of the forum, some features have been disabled to have it responsive.
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight Discord
Ares Defence Services Discord
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight DiscordAres Defence Services Discord

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Development Contributor Workflow

receiptHR Blog:

What *are* they doing over there?

receiptTeacher Blog:

Insight into the Teacher Team

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Infrastructure Upgrade 11/2019

receiptDevelopment Blog:

how suggestions???

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Planning for the future.


This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Closed 
Unban Request: [L²:RP] Kimpow
StephanGH radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 355
Threads: 19
Likes Given: 138
Likes Recieved: 191 in 124 posts
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 3
#16
Dec 30, 2018, 01:29 AM
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:28 AM)Welker Wrote:
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:15 AM)StephanGH Wrote: I am still confused.

She received a verbal warning for the FearRP. Meaning that that was already concluded. Yet it was still added as a Ban reason.

Then after that she gets a ban reason for "AFK to avoid RP" aswell. When a Staff member told her it's okay...

Everyone learn from this. You can get punished twice for a single offense. And you get banned even if staff says it's okay. Always contact HR for anything you want to do to ensure you won't receive a ban. It's the only way you are save from the dictatorship.

Moderator S1 and S2 can't be trusted on their word. As clearly other Staff don't respect their opinion and decision enough to bother paying attention to what they say.

For real, how was this not a Permanent warning, clearly no Ill intent was used. Staff members were informed of her actions. She showed she wished to continue RP after calming down, further more a Verbal was already issued for the FearRP.

Mind Blowing

EDIT: As for you @"Cole_"‍

Fair enough, I thought I heard it. He said something along the lines atleast. Must've just been directed towards me. As for the Weapons, I truly didn't see them. I was more focused on blocking Line of Sight towards Tibbs (Kim Lawrence) and help her get out somehow. I definitely didn't hear anyone yell STOP, or point their weapons however. And I was paying attention at that point.

And ofcourse, I don't take offense to what you say. I can miss things, just like you could.

Quote:Like I said in the @sit. Regardless of your OOC reasoning, you are required to follow the rules just like everybody else and please don't misconstrued you being warned as getting away with your rules you broke, this is the case for anyone for me, if you break a rule and get warned for it, continue to break the rules. I will punish you for all the rules you have broken. 

Yeah, One small problem with that bull.

SHE DIDN'T BREAK FEARRP A SECOND TIME.
She broke it once, received a Verbal for that. Then didn't break it again. Yet was punished a second time for that same exact situation.

Edit: even though IMO, she never broke FearRP. But I give up with that crap at this point.

Furthermore, the "AFK" was practically the same exact situation. And it has already practically been proven at this bloody point that there was no ILL Intent in that, AND A STAFF MEMBER GAVE HER PERMISSION

What the fuck is the point in asking staff for permission if it means fuck all even if they say it's fine?

MIND BLOWNNNNNNNNN


Once again we return to the lesson we all learn from this UBR. The word of S1 and S2 moderators does not only mean nothing to other staff members, it should mean nothing to us?

We should always contact Administrators, preferably Super Administrators to ensure that we are allowed to go AFK in a game to calm ourselves down IRL so we don't bloody get a panic attack. Because why should we care about our health? This game and the RP situations are more important than our own personal health.
With kind regards

Amazing Sheriff, Top Notch Dispatcher, Horrible drug-runner, Mediocre Detective and Horrible Financial Advisor
StephanGH

It was only 2.5 million $ of weed... In the Ocean, it's fine!
(This post was last modified: Dec 30, 2018, 01:34 AM by StephanGH. Edited 4 times in total.)
Welker radio_button_checked
Lord of House Hightower
Administrator (CityRP)
Posts: 1,225
Threads: 153
Likes Given: 1737
Likes Recieved: 2515 in 753 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 38
#17
Dec 30, 2018, 01:34 AM
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:29 AM)StephanGH Wrote:
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:28 AM)Welker Wrote:
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:15 AM)StephanGH Wrote: I am still confused.

She received a verbal warning for the FearRP. Meaning that that was already concluded. Yet it was still added as a Ban reason.

Then after that she gets a ban reason for "AFK to avoid RP" aswell. When a Staff member told her it's okay...

Everyone learn from this. You can get punished twice for a single offense. And you get banned even if staff says it's okay. Always contact HR for anything you want to do to ensure you won't receive a ban. It's the only way you are save from the dictatorship.

Moderator S1 and S2 can't be trusted on their word. As clearly other Staff don't respect their opinion and decision enough to bother paying attention to what they say.

For real, how was this not a Permanent warning, clearly no Ill intent was used. Staff members were informed of her actions. She showed she wished to continue RP after calming down, further more a Verbal was already issued for the FearRP.

Mind Blowing

EDIT: As for you @"Cole_"‍

Fair enough, I thought I heard it. He said something along the lines atleast. Must've just been directed towards me. As for the Weapons, I truly didn't see them. I was more focused on blocking Line of Sight towards Tibbs (Kim Lawrence) and help her get out somehow. I definitely didn't hear anyone yell STOP, or point their weapons however. And I was paying attention at that point.

And ofcourse, I don't take offense to what you say. I can miss things, just like you could.

Quote:Like I said in the @sit. Regardless of your OOC reasoning, you are required to follow the rules just like everybody else and please don't misconstrued you being warned as getting away with your rules you broke, this is the case for anyone for me, if you break a rule and get warned for it, continue to break the rules. I will punish you for all the rules you have broken. 

Yeah, One small problem with that bull.

SHE DIDN'T BREAK FEARRP A SECOND TIME.
She broke it once, received a Verbal for that. Then didn't break it again. Yet was punished a second time for that same exact situation.


MIND BLOWNNNNNNNNN


Stephan, please calm down. 

The courthouse is a place for civil discussions. As I have stated within my responses earlier if you'd been bothered to read it, the FearRP mostly took place within the vault, you were not present. Realistically you have very little to do with the case. Unless you have some important information or evidence to provide, I see no reason for you to continue with your enraged responses that add nothing to the case.
StephanGH radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 355
Threads: 19
Likes Given: 138
Likes Recieved: 191 in 124 posts
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 3
#18
Dec 30, 2018, 01:37 AM
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:34 AM)Welker Wrote:
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:29 AM)StephanGH Wrote: Yeah, One small problem with that bull.

SHE DIDN'T BREAK FEARRP A SECOND TIME.
She broke it once, received a Verbal for that. Then didn't break it again. Yet was punished a second time for that same exact situation.


MIND BLOWNNNNNNNNN


Stephan, please calm down. 

The courthouse is a place for civil discussions. As I have stated within my responses earlier if you'd been bothered to read it, the FearRP mostly took place within the vault, you were not present. Realistically you have very little to do with the case. Unless you have some important information or evidence to provide, I see no reason for you to continue with your enraged responses that add nothing to the case.

The moment you claim FearRP was broken, I was present in the vault, stop lying in the Courthouse. That's against the rules, you should know this.

Furthermore, it isn't being enraged. It's genuinly being amazed at how little this Staff Team seems to care about eachothers decisions. Do you all even communicate? One staff member says x, Staff member 2 bans us for what Staff Member one said is OKAY to do.

All you've proven in this UBR is that according to you;

1. Even when you are part of when the rule break takes place. That's not enough because RP happened before it which has nothing to do with a rulebreak.

And 2. There is no point in asking S1 S2 Moderators for permission, as it means nothing to other Staff members. We must contact Administrators, preferably even Super Administrators to ensure that we aren't being banned for situations other Moderators say are allright, cause either communication or respect is 0.

Kimpow was banned for something a Staff Member said was alright, furthermore we have added ban reasons which she already received punishment for. Makes no sense.
With kind regards

Amazing Sheriff, Top Notch Dispatcher, Horrible drug-runner, Mediocre Detective and Horrible Financial Advisor
StephanGH

It was only 2.5 million $ of weed... In the Ocean, it's fine!
(This post was last modified: Dec 30, 2018, 01:38 AM by StephanGH. Edited 1 time in total.)
Welker radio_button_checked
Lord of House Hightower
Administrator (CityRP)
Posts: 1,225
Threads: 153
Likes Given: 1737
Likes Recieved: 2515 in 753 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 38
#19
Dec 30, 2018, 01:46 AM
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:37 AM)StephanGH Wrote:
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:34 AM)Welker Wrote:
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:29 AM)StephanGH Wrote: Yeah, One small problem with that bull.

SHE DIDN'T BREAK FEARRP A SECOND TIME.
She broke it once, received a Verbal for that. Then didn't break it again. Yet was punished a second time for that same exact situation.


MIND BLOWNNNNNNNNN


Stephan, please calm down. 

The courthouse is a place for civil discussions. As I have stated within my responses earlier if you'd been bothered to read it, the FearRP mostly took place within the vault, you were not present. Realistically you have very little to do with the case. Unless you have some important information or evidence to provide, I see no reason for you to continue with your enraged responses that add nothing to the case.

The moment you claim FearRP was broken, I was present in the vault, stop lying in the Courthouse. That's against the rules, you should know this.

As you may know, the vault door is able to be opened and closed. The Fear RP, as I say for a third time. Mostly took place when the vault door was shut and you were on the outside.

Furthermore, it isn't being enraged. It's genuinly being amazed at how little this Staff Team seems to care about eachothers decisions. Do you all even communicate? One staff member says x, Staff member 2 bans us for what Staff Member one said is OKAY to do.

All you've proven in this UBR is that according to you;

1. Even when you are part of when the rule break takes place. That's not enough because RP happened before it which has nothing to do with a rulebreak.

And 2. There is no point in asking S1 S2 Moderators for permission, as it means nothing to other Staff members. We must contact Administrators, preferably even Super Administrators to ensure that we aren't being banned for situations other Moderators say are allright, cause either communication or respect is 0.

Kimpow was banned for something a Staff Member said was alright, furthermore we have added ban reasons which she already received punishment for. Makes no sense.

As for so called permission, it was given about 20 minutes after asking. Making it dubious at best, much like asking for permission to break NLR, you must explicitly have the permission for it before doing it, asking is simply not enough. Along with this, there is no context mentioning that Kimpow would be going AFK in the midst of an RP situation. Ultimately it is changing jobs to avoid RP.
[Image: 25InIIL.png]
(This post was last modified: Dec 30, 2018, 01:47 AM by Welker. Edited 2 times in total.)
StephanGH radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 355
Threads: 19
Likes Given: 138
Likes Recieved: 191 in 124 posts
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 3
#20
Dec 30, 2018, 01:49 AM
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:46 AM)Welker Wrote:
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:37 AM)StephanGH Wrote:
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:34 AM)Welker Wrote: Stephan, please calm down. 

The courthouse is a place for civil discussions. As I have stated within my responses earlier if you'd been bothered to read it, the FearRP mostly took place within the vault, you were not present. Realistically you have very little to do with the case. Unless you have some important information or evidence to provide, I see no reason for you to continue with your enraged responses that add nothing to the case.

The moment you claim FearRP was broken, I was present in the vault, stop lying in the Courthouse. That's against the rules, you should know this.

As you may know, the vault door is able to be opened and closed. The Fear RP, as I say for a third time. Mostly took place when the vault door was shut and you were on the outside.

Furthermore, it isn't being enraged. It's genuinly being amazed at how little this Staff Team seems to care about eachothers decisions. Do you all even communicate? One staff member says x, Staff member 2 bans us for what Staff Member one said is OKAY to do.

All you've proven in this UBR is that according to you;

1. Even when you are part of when the rule break takes place. That's not enough because RP happened before it which has nothing to do with a rulebreak.

And 2. There is no point in asking S1 S2 Moderators for permission, as it means nothing to other Staff members. We must contact Administrators, preferably even Super Administrators to ensure that we aren't being banned for situations other Moderators say are allright, cause either communication or respect is 0.

Kimpow was banned for something a Staff Member said was alright, furthermore we have added ban reasons which she already received punishment for. Makes no sense.

As for so called permission, it was given about 20 minutes after asking. Making it dubious at best, much like asking for permission to break NLR, you must explicitly have the permission for it before doing it, asking is simply not enough. Along with this, there is no context mentioning that Kimpow would be going AFK in the midst of an RP situation. Ultimately it is changing jobs to avoid RP.
[Image: 25InIIL.png]

Considering it's Kimmyspanda's ubr. and you refuse to acknowledge any true accusations. I'll let her deal with it or let Night conclude it.
With kind regards

Amazing Sheriff, Top Notch Dispatcher, Horrible drug-runner, Mediocre Detective and Horrible Financial Advisor
StephanGH

It was only 2.5 million $ of weed... In the Ocean, it's fine!
(This post was last modified: Dec 30, 2018, 01:50 AM by StephanGH.)
Kimpow radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 116
Threads: 23
Likes Given: 79
Likes Recieved: 211 in 72 posts
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation: 8
#21
Dec 30, 2018, 01:53 AM
As said, the fearRP situation has been dealt with and I believe had no reason to be put in the ban reason. It makes you appear indecisive and not quite sure about how this situation should have been dealt with.

For the second supposed rule breakage. I have proof pointing towards the fact I did return in an attempt to continue the roleplay. Yet, it is still not believed even though my private messages can still be found in the logs. Again, I also had permission from a staff member, telling me it was quite alright to take a breather.

For the context, I again apologise for the inconvenience. Searching through the evidence posted above, I saw I missed one screenshot. I’ll add this one below:

[Image: JiBzrRF.png]

The picture proves again, it was allowed and suggested.
Please, do let me know what you think.

Kind regards,
Kimpow
[Image: lb5BN5f.png]
Welker radio_button_checked
Lord of House Hightower
Administrator (CityRP)
Posts: 1,225
Threads: 153
Likes Given: 1737
Likes Recieved: 2515 in 753 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 38
#22
Dec 30, 2018, 02:00 AM
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:53 AM)Kimpow Wrote: As said, the fearRP situation has been dealt with and I believe had no reason to be put in the ban reason. It makes you appear indecisive and not quite sure about how this situation should have been dealt with.

For the second supposed rule breakage. I have proof pointing towards the fact I did return in an attempt to continue the roleplay. Yet, it is still not believed even though my private messages can still be found in the logs. Again, I also had permission from a staff member, telling me it was quite alright to take a breather.

For the context, I again apologise for the inconvenience. Searching through the evidence posted above, I saw I missed one screenshot. I’ll add this one below:

[Image: JiBzrRF.png]

The picture proves again, it was allowed and suggested.
Please, do let me know what you think.

Kind regards,
Kimpow

Again with the context, this could have been said by anyone about anything. This screenshot was taken roughly  25 minutes before this whole situation even happened, if I am not mistaken. Unfortunately time zones can be quite confusing. So I don't see how you could have been asking for permission to leave the server/change jobs in the RP situation when it had not even happened yet. I'd really hope you're not trying to be misleading on the court house.

If you want your evidence to be taken seriously I strongly suggest you post the entire thing.
(This post was last modified: Dec 30, 2018, 02:05 AM by Welker. Edited 2 times in total.)
Cole radio_button_checked
eX tEaChEr
Veteran Member
Posts: 1,228
Threads: 67
Likes Given: 261
Likes Recieved: 670 in 389 posts
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 21
#23
Dec 30, 2018, 02:06 AM
The difference is @Kimpow‍ , word from an anonymous member of staff who may not even be directly involved in the situation means absolutely nothing. They might not know any context to the situation and therefore be basing their answer off of an assumption. I'm fairly certain I, and staff, know who the staff member is but I'll keep that out of this UBR to avoid arguments. 

The situation with the AFK ban reason, more than likely, wouldn't have happened if you'd asked a staff member who was *directly* involved with the situation you was going AFK from as they'd know that you had to go AFK or something alike, rather than you just disappearing into the AFK slot whilst they're still trying to roleplay with you.
<p><br></p>
Kimpow radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 116
Threads: 23
Likes Given: 79
Likes Recieved: 211 in 72 posts
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation: 8
#24
Dec 30, 2018, 02:17 AM
I will happily provide a Supervising Administrator the full chat logs, for they do prove I have given them the right context.
[Image: lb5BN5f.png]
(This post was last modified: Dec 30, 2018, 02:17 AM by Kimpow.)
Kimpow radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 116
Threads: 23
Likes Given: 79
Likes Recieved: 211 in 72 posts
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation: 8
#25
Dec 30, 2018, 02:20 AM
(Dec 30, 2018, 02:00 AM)Welker Wrote:
(Dec 30, 2018, 01:53 AM)Kimpow Wrote: As said, the fearRP situation has been dealt with and I believe had no reason to be put in the ban reason. It makes you appear indecisive and not quite sure about how this situation should have been dealt with.

For the second supposed rule breakage. I have proof pointing towards the fact I did return in an attempt to continue the roleplay. Yet, it is still not believed even though my private messages can still be found in the logs. Again, I also had permission from a staff member, telling me it was quite alright to take a breather.

For the context, I again apologise for the inconvenience. Searching through the evidence posted above, I saw I missed one screenshot. I’ll add this one below:

[Image: JiBzrRF.png]

The picture proves again, it was allowed and suggested.
Please, do let me know what you think.

Kind regards,
Kimpow

Again with the context, this could have been said by anyone about anything. This screenshot was taken roughly  25 minutes before this whole situation even happened, if I am not mistaken. Unfortunately time zones can be quite confusing. So I don't see how you could have been asking for permission to leave the server/change jobs in the RP situation when it had not even happened yet. I'd really hope you're not trying to be misleading on the court house.

If you want your evidence to be taken seriously I strongly suggest you post the entire thing.

Timezones are quite confusing, yes. However, I can assure you I am not misleading the court house, nor am I a time traveler. I believe you just mixed up the whole timezones.
[Image: lb5BN5f.png]
Cole radio_button_checked
eX tEaChEr
Veteran Member
Posts: 1,228
Threads: 67
Likes Given: 261
Likes Recieved: 670 in 389 posts
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 21
#26
Dec 30, 2018, 02:34 AM
@Kimpow, but regardless of context, would it not make much more sense to ask those who you were role playing with if you can go AFK, rather than someone who wasn’t directly involved?
<p><br></p>
Wesley Lawrence radio_button_checked
Veteran
Veteran Member
Posts: 1,171
Threads: 37
Likes Given: 1303
Likes Recieved: 1063 in 602 posts
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation: 25
#27
Dec 30, 2018, 02:37 AM
(Dec 30, 2018, 02:06 AM)Cole_ Wrote: The difference is @Kimpow‍ , word from an anonymous member of staff who may not even be directly involved in the situation means absolutely nothing. They might not know any context to the situation and therefore be basing their answer off of an assumption. I'm fairly certain I, and staff, know who the staff member is but I'll keep that out of this UBR to avoid arguments.

As you're obviously shoving that towards my direction here and in fact didn't keep it out of the UBR to avoid arguments, I'll give my one and only piece in this. ''Staff'', whoever that might be you're talking about, should know who it is because I provided them with an @-mention in the staff Discord. This is because the staff member that it's regarding, is not around at the moment. I will not go into detail about that further, as he can talk for himself. Then again, this is something you couldn't have possibly known as you have no access to the moderation channel on the Limelight team Discord whatsoever.

Now let's refrain from pointing fingers here, actually look at the evidence and have someone evaluate it properly and conclude it instead of the unnecessary back and forths that have been going on.

[Image: 5H73Ev1.gif]
Cole radio_button_checked
eX tEaChEr
Veteran Member
Posts: 1,228
Threads: 67
Likes Given: 261
Likes Recieved: 670 in 389 posts
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 21
#28
Dec 30, 2018, 02:39 AM
(Dec 30, 2018, 02:37 AM)Wesley Lawrence Wrote:
(Dec 30, 2018, 02:06 AM)Cole_ Wrote: The difference is @Kimpow‍ , word from an anonymous member of staff who may not even be directly involved in the situation means absolutely nothing. They might not know any context to the situation and therefore be basing their answer off of an assumption. I'm fairly certain I, and staff, know who the staff member is but I'll keep that out of this UBR to avoid arguments.

As you're obviously shoving that towards my direction here and in fact didn't keep it out of the UBR to avoid arguments, I'll give my one and only piece in this. ''Staff'', whoever that might be you're talking about, should know who it is because I provided them with an @-mention in the staff Discord. This is because the staff member that it's regarding, is not around at the moment. I will not go into detail about that further, as he can talk for himself. Then again, this is something you couldn't have possibly known as you have no access to the moderation channel on the Limelight team Discord whatsoever.

Now let's refrain from pointing fingers here, actually look at the evidence and have someone evaluate it properly and conclude it instead of the unnecessary back and forths that have been going on.
I didn’t point a finger at anyone, you’re assuming I did.
<p><br></p>
Kimpow radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 116
Threads: 23
Likes Given: 79
Likes Recieved: 211 in 72 posts
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation: 8
#29
Dec 30, 2018, 02:51 AM
@Cole_ I was quite upset, therefore trying to distance myself from those I am not quite familiar with in order to re-collect myself. For me, your statement doesn't quite make as much sense.
[Image: lb5BN5f.png]
(This post was last modified: Dec 30, 2018, 02:52 AM by Kimpow. Edited 1 time in total.)
ForceGhost
Guest
 
#30
Dec 30, 2018, 03:06 AM
(Dec 30, 2018, 02:51 AM)Kimpow Wrote: @Cole_ I was quite upset, therefore trying to distance myself from those I am not quite familiar with in order to re-collect myself. For me, your statement doesn't quite make as much sense.

1.3 - Do not reconnect, suicide, change job or do anything else to avoid a roleplay situation. If you suddenly have to go, inform the people you are roleplaying with via LOOC and give them a few minutes to conclude the RP. If you are unable to stay for those few minutes, we recommend that you go AFK instead of disconnecting and inform staff via @.
Closed 




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)