Login
Sign Up


You are using the mobile version of the forum, some features have been disabled to have it responsive.
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight Discord
Ares Defence Services Discord
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight DiscordAres Defence Services Discord

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Development Contributor Workflow

receiptHR Blog:

What *are* they doing over there?

receiptTeacher Blog:

Insight into the Teacher Team

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Infrastructure Upgrade 11/2019

receiptDevelopment Blog:

how suggestions???

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Planning for the future.


This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Government Whitelist
give me the gamemode radio_button_checked
give me the gamemode
Membership
Posts: 501
Threads: 22
Likes Given: 525
Likes Recieved: 713 in 397 posts
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 10
#16
Dec 27, 2017, 04:19 PM
(Dec 27, 2017, 04:15 AM)Gungranny Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 03:46 AM)Tails Wrote: realistically a whitelist wont solve shit because the dickheads that go around random arresting (me) can easily apply and get it

They would also be fairly easy to remove from the whitelist.

so you're saying the solution is to remove everyone you dont think are cut out for it, leaving few people to fill the job?
give me the gamemode
The following 1 user Likes give me the gamemode's post:
  • Nudel
Soviethooves radio_button_checked
American Player
Media Contractor
Posts: 6,711
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 33
#17
Dec 27, 2017, 07:36 PM
(Dec 27, 2017, 04:19 PM)Tails Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 04:15 AM)Gungranny Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 03:46 AM)Tails Wrote: realistically a whitelist wont solve shit because the dickheads that go around random arresting (me) can easily apply and get it

They would also be fairly easy to remove from the whitelist.

so you're saying the solution is to remove everyone you dont think are cut out for it, leaving few people to fill the job?

That is what a Whitelist system is. The Chief and staff liaison can choose to remove someone from a rank or officer entirely if they feel it is necessary. They could still try to re-apply as everyone has access to the cadet job by default.
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
[Image: n0LLhCI.jpg]
Nudel radio_button_checked
nuh uh
Mission Support (ADS)
Posts: 3,061
Threads: 181
Likes Given: 8789
Likes Recieved: 2111 in 1294 posts
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation: 52
#18
Dec 27, 2017, 09:02 PM
(Dec 27, 2017, 07:36 PM)Gungranny Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 04:19 PM)Tails Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 04:15 AM)Gungranny Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 03:46 AM)Tails Wrote: realistically a whitelist wont solve shit because the dickheads that go around random arresting (me) can easily apply and get it

They would also be fairly easy to remove from the whitelist.

so you're saying the solution is to remove everyone you dont think are cut out for it, leaving few people to fill the job?

That is what a Whitelist system is. The Chief and staff liaison can choose to remove someone from a rank or officer entirely if they feel it is necessary. They could still try to re-apply as everyone has access to the cadet job by default.

I see bias in this system.
Soviethooves radio_button_checked
American Player
Media Contractor
Posts: 6,711
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 33
#19
Dec 27, 2017, 09:18 PM
(Dec 27, 2017, 09:02 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 07:36 PM)Gungranny Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 04:19 PM)Tails Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 04:15 AM)Gungranny Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 03:46 AM)Tails Wrote: realistically a whitelist wont solve shit because the dickheads that go around random arresting (me) can easily apply and get it

They would also be fairly easy to remove from the whitelist.

so you're saying the solution is to remove everyone you dont think are cut out for it, leaving few people to fill the job?

That is what a Whitelist system is. The Chief and staff liaison can choose to remove someone from a rank or officer entirely if they feel it is necessary. They could still try to re-apply as everyone has access to the cadet job by default.

I see bias in this system.

How so? The fact that a player voted into the Chief position is monitored and assisted by a staff liaison for most of his/her actions and can be removed if proper arguments and evidence is given? Not to mention if you ARE demoted for proper reasons, you can always join the Cadet Job and continue to prove that you deserve your job back. After all, there would be multiple people with rank that could approve you for the officer job. The Chief is just in charge of appointing rank, approving cadets to regular officers (If another officer of rank doesn't do it), and runs the PD's paperwork side (Policies, Procedures, etc.)

There will always be a chance of bias. There is no way to stop it. Most people are passive about like you, me, and many other players and staff. You can't create an unbais system that involves a CoC. It will always be a risk. The only thing you can do is create countermeasures for corruption such as the option to call out officers in power and ask for their demotion (Kind of like how a PR works. At least, that is how I see it).
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
[Image: n0LLhCI.jpg]
(This post was last modified: Dec 27, 2017, 09:21 PM by Soviethooves. Edited 1 time in total.)
The following 1 user Likes Soviethooves's post:
  • Nudel
Jen Away
Stell
Core Staff
Posts: 1,310
Threads: 89
Likes Given: 961
Likes Recieved: 646 in 368 posts
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation: 11
User is currently away.
#20
Dec 27, 2017, 09:24 PM
(Dec 27, 2017, 09:02 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 07:36 PM)Gungranny Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 04:19 PM)Tails Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 04:15 AM)Gungranny Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 03:46 AM)Tails Wrote: realistically a whitelist wont solve shit because the dickheads that go around random arresting (me) can easily apply and get it

They would also be fairly easy to remove from the whitelist.

so you're saying the solution is to remove everyone you dont think are cut out for it, leaving few people to fill the job?

That is what a Whitelist system is. The Chief and staff liaison can choose to remove someone from a rank or officer entirely if they feel it is necessary. They could still try to re-apply as everyone has access to the cadet job by default.

I see bias in this system.

This is the point of IA, IA - Internal Affairs. Is a team of people which monitorofficers and deal with IA complaints regarding officers. Meaning that you will need to have more than one person agreeing to the demotion or removal of someone from the police force.

Hell, you could add even more PSD, People Services Division, if they feel that you will abuse your job and are setting a bad standard to the public they will inform IA and have a say on if you should be removed from PD. But here you would need 2 teams to agree.

Bias, it could happen yes, but if you have a big team of people then this shouldn't happen.

In short: IA is like a court, big group of people decide your faite.
Preditor radio_button_checked
Supervising Veteran :)
Veteran Member
Posts: 553
Threads: 14
Likes Given: 423
Likes Recieved: 832 in 314 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 12
#21
Dec 27, 2017, 11:35 PM
I do like the general idea of a cadet system where they can unlock officer and then sergeant after longer gameplay experience. Though the only thing I'll warn, which I have before is don't overcomplicate it. The server is bad enough with cops and robbers if you want to fix it stop promoting it and focus in other parts like chef or taxi driver RPs.
[Image: 0bfCO3P.png]
Thx bambo gambo dambo sambo lambo jambo rambo.
The following 3 users Like Preditor's post:
  • give me the gamemode, Nudel, Soviethooves
give me the gamemode radio_button_checked
give me the gamemode
Membership
Posts: 501
Threads: 22
Likes Given: 525
Likes Recieved: 713 in 397 posts
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 10
#22
Dec 27, 2017, 11:55 PM
(Dec 27, 2017, 09:24 PM)Stell90 Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 09:02 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 07:36 PM)Gungranny Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 04:19 PM)Tails Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 04:15 AM)Gungranny Wrote: They would also be fairly easy to remove from the whitelist.

so you're saying the solution is to remove everyone you dont think are cut out for it, leaving few people to fill the job?

That is what a Whitelist system is. The Chief and staff liaison can choose to remove someone from a rank or officer entirely if they feel it is necessary. They could still try to re-apply as everyone has access to the cadet job by default.

I see bias in this system.

This is the point of IA, IA - Internal Affairs. Is a team of people which monitorofficers and deal with IA complaints regarding officers. Meaning that you will need to have more than one person agreeing to the demotion or removal of someone from the police force.

Hell, you could add even more PSD, People Services Division, if they feel that you will abuse your job and are setting a bad standard to the public they will inform IA and have a say on if you should be removed from PD. But here you would need 2 teams to agree.

Bias, it could happen yes, but if you have a big team of people then this shouldn't happen.

In short: IA is like a court, big group of people decide your faite.


It shouldn't happen, but it will.
give me the gamemode
Taylor radio_button_checked
"You are not torturing people in your office"
Contributor
Posts: 3,089
Threads: 177
Likes Given: 2640
Likes Recieved: 1993 in 1215 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 40
#23
Dec 28, 2017, 01:54 AM
(Dec 27, 2017, 09:02 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 07:36 PM)Gungranny Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 04:19 PM)Tails Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 04:15 AM)Gungranny Wrote:
(Dec 27, 2017, 03:46 AM)Tails Wrote: realistically a whitelist wont solve shit because the dickheads that go around random arresting (me) can easily apply and get it

They would also be fairly easy to remove from the whitelist.

so you're saying the solution is to remove everyone you dont think are cut out for it, leaving few people to fill the job?

That is what a Whitelist system is. The Chief and staff liaison can choose to remove someone from a rank or officer entirely if they feel it is necessary. They could still try to re-apply as everyone has access to the cadet job by default.

I see bias in this system.

Welcome to life, nice of you to join us.
[Image: 800px-PWRR_Tiger.svg.png]
Have I helped you out? Leave a rep!
The following 1 user Likes Taylor's post:
  • give me the gamemode




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)