Login
Sign Up


You are using the mobile version of the forum, some features have been disabled to have it responsive.
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight Discord
Ares Defence Services Discord
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight DiscordAres Defence Services Discord

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Development Contributor Workflow

receiptHR Blog:

What *are* they doing over there?

receiptTeacher Blog:

Insight into the Teacher Team

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Infrastructure Upgrade 11/2019

receiptDevelopment Blog:

how suggestions???

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Planning for the future.


This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.
Poll: Do you support this suggestion?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
60.00%
15 60.00%
No
40.00%
10 40.00%
Total 25 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]


Closed 
Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan
Soviethooves radio_button_checked
American Player
Media Contractor
Posts: 6,711
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 33
#16
May 4, 2017, 11:23 PM
+Support a 1 gov rep restriction for the whole job and only allow the vehicle to be accessed by fire chief.

If we just lock the vehicle, the job would be useless as you wouldn't have proper transportation.
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
[Image: n0LLhCI.jpg]
(This post was last modified: May 4, 2017, 11:24 PM by Soviethooves.)
The following 1 user Likes Soviethooves's post:
  • evilmat360
Dan radio_button_checked
2018 Limey most hated & most toxic
Membership
Posts: 1,016
Threads: 122
Likes Given: 1037
Likes Recieved: 1206 in 476 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 9
#17
May 4, 2017, 11:32 PM
(May 4, 2017, 11:23 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: +Support a 1 gov rep restriction for the whole job and only allow the vehicle to be accessed by fire chief.
[Image: kOhF5tH.png]
Cooli radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 1,999
Threads: 88
Likes Given: 451
Likes Recieved: 824 in 617 posts
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation: 24
#18
May 5, 2017, 12:12 AM
(May 4, 2017, 11:23 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: +Support a 1 gov rep restriction for the whole job and only allow the vehicle to be accessed by fire chief.

If we just lock the vehicle, the job would be useless as you wouldn't have proper transportation.
and have the job empty most of the time? I would rather not.
Soviethooves radio_button_checked
American Player
Media Contractor
Posts: 6,711
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 33
#19
May 5, 2017, 12:21 AM
(May 5, 2017, 12:12 AM)Cooli Wrote:
(May 4, 2017, 11:23 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: +Support a 1 gov rep restriction for the whole job and only allow the vehicle to be accessed by fire chief.

If we just lock the vehicle, the job would be useless as you wouldn't have proper transportation.
and have the job empty most of the time? I would rather not.

Why not? It's an important job that requires skill and give the player a special vehicle that was on accessible through REP's.
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
[Image: n0LLhCI.jpg]
The following 1 user Likes Soviethooves's post:
  • Dan
Cooli radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 1,999
Threads: 88
Likes Given: 451
Likes Recieved: 824 in 617 posts
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation: 24
#20
May 5, 2017, 12:59 AM
(May 5, 2017, 12:21 AM)Soviethooves Wrote:
(May 5, 2017, 12:12 AM)Cooli Wrote:
(May 4, 2017, 11:23 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: +Support a 1 gov rep restriction for the whole job and only allow the vehicle to be accessed by fire chief.

If we just lock the vehicle, the job would be useless as you wouldn't have proper transportation.
and have the job empty most of the time? I would rather not.

Why not? It's an important job that requires skill and give the player a special vehicle that was on accessible through REP's.
not that important if you can have it empty most of the time.
Project radio_button_checked
Assisting and Mapping
RP Assistant (CityRP)
Posts: 2,968
Threads: 177
Likes Given: 2845
Likes Recieved: 1510 in 915 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 46
#21
May 5, 2017, 01:21 AM
+Support
[Image: sO5GyCt.png]
Soviethooves radio_button_checked
American Player
Media Contractor
Posts: 6,711
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 33
#22
May 5, 2017, 01:29 AM
(May 5, 2017, 12:59 AM)Cooli Wrote:
(May 5, 2017, 12:21 AM)Soviethooves Wrote:
(May 5, 2017, 12:12 AM)Cooli Wrote:
(May 4, 2017, 11:23 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: +Support a 1 gov rep restriction for the whole job and only allow the vehicle to be accessed by fire chief.

If we just lock the vehicle, the job would be useless as you wouldn't have proper transportation.
and have the job empty most of the time? I would rather not.

Why not? It's an important job that requires skill and give the player a special vehicle that was on accessible through REP's.
not that important if you can have it empty most of the time.

50% at most. Most players have some kind of REP (If we decide to merge all REP's together which would be better IMO) or if they don't, it shows they shouldn't be in the position as they lack the required skill. This leaves it open for the better half of the RPers on our servers.
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
[Image: n0LLhCI.jpg]
Cooli radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 1,999
Threads: 88
Likes Given: 451
Likes Recieved: 824 in 617 posts
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation: 24
#23
May 5, 2017, 01:33 AM
(May 5, 2017, 01:29 AM)Soviethooves Wrote:
(May 5, 2017, 12:59 AM)Cooli Wrote:
(May 5, 2017, 12:21 AM)Soviethooves Wrote:
(May 5, 2017, 12:12 AM)Cooli Wrote:
(May 4, 2017, 11:23 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: +Support a 1 gov rep restriction for the whole job and only allow the vehicle to be accessed by fire chief.

If we just lock the vehicle, the job would be useless as you wouldn't have proper transportation.
and have the job empty most of the time? I would rather not.

Why not? It's an important job that requires skill and give the player a special vehicle that was on accessible through REP's.
not that important if you can have it empty most of the time.

50% at most. Most players have some kind of REP (If we decide to merge all REP's together which would be better IMO) or if they don't, it shows they shouldn't be in the position as they lack the required skill. This leaves it open for the better half of the RPers on our servers.
Firefighters/Fire Chief are one of the least played jobs, and most goverment rep is from policerp. Usually it would be empty. Also I dont think merging REP together is a good idea as you can just do one kind of rp and get all exclusive items by that.
Dan radio_button_checked
2018 Limey most hated & most toxic
Membership
Posts: 1,016
Threads: 122
Likes Given: 1037
Likes Recieved: 1206 in 476 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 9
#24
May 5, 2017, 01:36 AM
(May 5, 2017, 01:29 AM)Soviethooves Wrote:
(May 5, 2017, 12:59 AM)Cooli Wrote:
(May 5, 2017, 12:21 AM)Soviethooves Wrote:
(May 5, 2017, 12:12 AM)Cooli Wrote:
(May 4, 2017, 11:23 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: +Support a 1 gov rep restriction for the whole job and only allow the vehicle to be accessed by fire chief.

If we just lock the vehicle, the job would be useless as you wouldn't have proper transportation.
and have the job empty most of the time? I would rather not.

Why not? It's an important job that requires skill and give the player a special vehicle that was on accessible through REP's.
not that important if you can have it empty most of the time.

50% at most. Most players have some kind of REP (If we decide to merge all REP's together which would be better IMO) or if they don't, it shows they shouldn't be in the position as they lack the required skill. This leaves it open for the better half of the RPers on our servers.

Yeah I say merge all reps together and call them RP points
[Image: kOhF5tH.png]
Soviethooves radio_button_checked
American Player
Media Contractor
Posts: 6,711
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 33
#25
May 5, 2017, 03:22 AM
(May 5, 2017, 01:33 AM)Cooli Wrote:
(May 5, 2017, 01:29 AM)Soviethooves Wrote:
(May 5, 2017, 12:59 AM)Cooli Wrote:
(May 5, 2017, 12:21 AM)Soviethooves Wrote:
(May 5, 2017, 12:12 AM)Cooli Wrote: and have the job empty most of the time? I would rather not.

Why not? It's an important job that requires skill and give the player a special vehicle that was on accessible through REP's.
not that important if you can have it empty most of the time.

50% at most. Most players have some kind of REP (If we decide to merge all REP's together which would be better IMO) or if they don't, it shows they shouldn't be in the position as they lack the required skill. This leaves it open for the better half of the RPers on our servers.
Firefighters/Fire Chief are one of the least played jobs, and most goverment rep is from policerp. Usually it would be empty. Also I dont think merging REP together is a good idea as you can just do one kind of rp and get all exclusive items by that.

Players have actually been playing the FD and EMS jobs more frequently in the past few days from what I've seen. What I don't understand is how REP locking an important job (That like you said is already barely used) is that the player that DO know how to RP the job, will be able to effectively and we won't see Joe Jr. with 0 hours popping on and picking the one job that controls the team that chooses when to put out fires and revive players (As most of the time, the FD has the Paramedics).

And putting all REPs together would mean that someone with 7 Gov REP's would be able to move his experience over to Underground or General REP items, to increase his RP Freedoms and try different things as he earned those REPs. Not combining them would mean you could be the BEST at Regular RP, but couldn't grab Spikestrips or a Thompson because they weren't in the same category.
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
[Image: n0LLhCI.jpg]
The following 1 user Likes Soviethooves's post:
  • Project
Dan radio_button_checked
2018 Limey most hated & most toxic
Membership
Posts: 1,016
Threads: 122
Likes Given: 1037
Likes Recieved: 1206 in 476 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 9
#26
May 5, 2017, 03:53 AM
Bring back the defibs and fix the f350 and i'll play everyday
[Image: kOhF5tH.png]
The following 3 users Like Dan's post:
  • Project, Soviethooves, Stomm
Dick radio_button_checked
Supervising Administrator
Supervising Administrator (ADS)
Posts: 4,655
Threads: 470
Likes Given: 1828
Likes Recieved: 1949 in 1252 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 25
#27
May 5, 2017, 04:47 AM
+Support
[Image: EnzxzUF.png]
SirWulf radio_button_checked
Former Fire and Rescue
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,033
Threads: 31
Likes Given: 628
Likes Recieved: 1179 in 537 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 21
#28
May 6, 2017, 06:26 PM
This is more of a bug.  The Suburban should be for the Fire Chief job only, Firefighters should not be able to spawn it.

In addition, only 1 Fire Chief should be available, not 2.
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2017, 06:26 PM by SirWulf.)
The following 1 user Likes SirWulf's post:
  • Cochise
Cameron radio_button_checked
Veteran
Veteran Member
Posts: 1,009
Threads: 31
Likes Given: 823
Likes Recieved: 610 in 277 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 14
#29
May 6, 2017, 06:36 PM
(May 6, 2017, 06:26 PM)SirWulf Wrote: This is more of a bug.  The Suburban should be for the Fire Chief job only, Firefighters should not be able to spawn it.

In addition, only 1 Fire Chief should be available, not 2.

Suburban is only spawnable by the chief.
There can only be 1 chief (was fixed a few days ago)  Cool
The following 2 users Like Cameron's post:
  • Cochise, SirWulf
Fly radio_button_checked
#LLSeriousRP
Membership
Posts: 465
Threads: 29
Likes Given: 66
Likes Recieved: 283 in 200 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 4
#30
May 6, 2017, 06:49 PM
As Rock also pointed out, i'm against restrictions too (Especially REPs), though, i can see why it would be more appropriate setting lots of the REP restrictions to time restrictions.

And as in the real world, give it some time. When something is made legal, there's going to be a spike in use, just like when the towtruck was added on the server.

-Support
enjoy

++[------>+<]>-.[-->+++++<]>.+++++.+++++.++++[->+++<]>.+++++++++++++.++.[---->+<]>+++.-[--->++<]>-.+++++++++.---.-.-----.------.[--->+<]>-.+[->+++<]>.++++++++++++.--..--------.+++++++++.++++++.[---->+<]>+++.[->+++<]>+.+.+++++++++++++.++++++.-.[---->+<]>+++.--[->++++<]>+.----------.++++++.-[---->+<]>+++.--[->++++<]>-.-[->+++<]>-.--[--->+<]>--.+.-----------.+++++.-------.-[--->+<]>--.--[->++++<]>+.----------.++++++.---.[-->+++++<]>+++.---[->++++<]>.-----------.++++.--------.--[--->+<]>-.++[->+++<]>.+++.+++++.----------.+++++.+++++.-------.-[--->+<]>--.[->+++<]>+.-[->+++<]>.[->+++<]>++.[--->+<]>----.+++[->+++<]>++.++++++++.+++++.--------.-[--->+<]>--.+[->+++<]>+.++++++++.-[++>---<]>+.-[--->++<]>-.+++++.++++++.+++[->+++<]>.+++++++++++++.--.++.-------------.[--->+<]>---.+++[->+++<]>.+++++++++++++.[++>---<]>-.

Closed 




Users browsing this thread: