Suggestion for <in-game/forum/teamspeak etc.>: In-Game
In detail, explain your suggestion: Lock the suburan again for 2 Gov Rep (or the Fire chief Job)
Why should this be implemented? Dont see why it got removed. If you dont got the rep dont go Fire Chief.
Another Reason:
(May 4, 2017, 08:54 PM)Vatipaa Wrote: [ -> ]Ok what am I thinking, this could motivate doing RP, if they know they will get something from it.
(May 4, 2017, 11:23 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: [ -> ]+Support a 1 gov rep restriction for the whole job and only allow the vehicle to be accessed by fire chief.
If we just lock the vehicle, the job would be useless as you wouldn't have proper transportation.
(May 31, 2017, 07:57 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: [ -> ]Not to mention we barely have REP rewards. Having the job a REP required job would be another reward to get to.
There are only FD suburans driving around, no Fire Engines anymore because of this.
Im agaisnt of any restrictions
-Support
- Support.
But add some more REP-locked or freely available vehicles, like pickups.
(May 4, 2017, 08:44 PM)Vatipaa Wrote: [ -> ]-Support, cmon why we should make everything REP locked??
(May 4, 2017, 08:04 PM)The Rock Wrote: [ -> ]Im agaisnt of any restrictions
-Support
It was REP locked any nobody was saying something against it. Also, now FD doesnt have anything "special" anymore.
(May 4, 2017, 08:35 PM)francysol3c Wrote: [ -> ]- Support.
But add some more REP-locked or freely available vehicles, like pickups.
So.. Instead of adding REP back to it, you want to add a new vehicle that is REP locked ?
(May 4, 2017, 08:49 PM)Vatipaa Wrote: [ -> ] (May 4, 2017, 08:47 PM)Nebula Wrote: [ -> ] (May 4, 2017, 08:44 PM)Vatipaa Wrote: [ -> ]-Support, cmon why we should make everything REP locked??
(May 4, 2017, 08:04 PM)The Rock Wrote: [ -> ]Im agaisnt of any restrictions
-Support
It was REP locked any nobody was saying something against it. Also, now FD doesnt have anything "special" anymore.
(May 4, 2017, 08:35 PM)francysol3c Wrote: [ -> ]- Support.
But add some more REP-locked or freely available vehicles, like pickups.
So.. Instead of adding REP back to it, you want to add a new vehicle that is REP locked ?
Still -Supporting it
Why ? What is your Problem that it is REP locked
again while nobody said anything against it beeing REP locked.
(May 4, 2017, 08:47 PM)Nebula Wrote: [ -> ] (May 4, 2017, 08:44 PM)Vatipaa Wrote: [ -> ]-Support, cmon why we should make everything REP locked??
(May 4, 2017, 08:04 PM)The Rock Wrote: [ -> ]Im agaisnt of any restrictions
-Support
It was REP locked any nobody was saying something against it. Also, now FD doesnt have anything "special" anymore.
(May 4, 2017, 08:35 PM)francysol3c Wrote: [ -> ]- Support.
But add some more REP-locked or freely available vehicles, like pickups.
So.. Instead of adding REP back to it, you want to add a new vehicle that is REP locked ?
You understood correctly
(May 4, 2017, 09:35 PM)francysol3c Wrote: [ -> ] (May 4, 2017, 08:47 PM)Nebula Wrote: [ -> ] (May 4, 2017, 08:35 PM)francysol3c Wrote: [ -> ]- Support.
But add some more REP-locked or freely available vehicles, like pickups.
So.. Instead of adding REP back to it, you want to add a new vehicle that is REP locked ?
You understood correctly
That doesnt seem so logical to me..
Limit it to Fire Chief. Done.
Cooli, the thing is. There is no "Fire Chief" job.
OT: +Support, this will not only motivate people to RP but will reduce the unrealistic scenario of 3 suburbans and no fire trucks.
(May 4, 2017, 10:12 PM)Faustin Wrote: [ -> ]Cooli, the thing is. There is no "Fire Chief" job.
OT: +Support, this will not only motivate people to RP but will reduce the unrealistic scenario of 3 suburbans and no fire trucks.
Guessing you haven't seen the changelogs, was an update yesterday. Seems this removal of the restriction as coincided with the job being released.
+support for bringing the restriction back, when it was released originally it did give me a reason to RP as gov in an attempt to get it.
Pretty sure it's now 2 chief's and 3 firemen, so you could theoretically have 5 suburban's and no engines.