[Taylor]

Not really, but ok.

Your boss has stated and I quote: "Should they have been warned? Probably, yep. Were they? Nope." My question is why? At the time my warning was issued: Cole, ForceGhost and Decay had all violated the forum rules in one way or another, granted the rules have now been changed, but at the time they posted the old rules were still in place.

Notice how all 3 of them have been apart of the team in one way or another, but none of them punished?

I'm afraid my LL staff hivemind isn't working right now. Mind giving me a link so I know what you're talking about please?

Lord Octagon’s thread on Abortion.

[Doctor Internet]

Your boss has stated and I quote: "Should they have been warned? Probably, yep. Were they? Nope." My question is why? At the time my warning was issued: Cole, ForceGhost and Decay had all violated the forum rules in one way or another, granted the rules have now been changed, but at the time they posted the old rules were still in place.

Notice how all 3 of them have been apart of the team in one way or another, but none of them punished?

I'm afraid my LL staff hivemind isn't working right now. Mind giving me a link so I know what you're talking about please?

Lord Octagon’s thread on Abortion.

Okay, that's great, but I've never seen that quote before.
My boss could refer to like 12 different people.
That's why I asked for a link, I'm assuming your quoting from a thread that I haven't seen, so I'd like to see it and the context around it.

[Taylor]

I'm afraid my LL staff hivemind isn't working right now. Mind giving me a link so I know what you're talking about please?

Lord Octagon’s thread on Abortion.

Okay, that's great, but I've never seen that quote before.
My boss could refer to like 12 different people.
That's why I asked for a link, I'm assuming your quoting from a thread that I haven't seen, so I'd like to see it and the context around it.

My bad, thought you were referring to the thread where Cole, Force and Decay broke the rules.

The quote came from a discord DM

[Doctor Internet]

Lord Octagon’s thread on Abortion.

Okay, that's great, but I've never seen that quote before.
My boss could refer to like 12 different people.
That's why I asked for a link, I'm assuming your quoting from a thread that I haven't seen, so I'd like to see it and the context around it.

My bad, thought you were referring to the thread where Cole, Force and Decay broke the rules.

The quote came from a discord DM

Uhuh, a quote with no context from a DM?

Secrecy

Most staff members are happy to chat to you personally, at least I am, and I try to make sure there's always a route open to speak to HR etc. too. They just don't like being dragged into loaded conversations where every chat is recorded and used as ammo down the line. I've experienced this a few too many times for comfort, but I still continue best as I can to offer an ear. 

I afraid I can't speak about a single quote, from a DM, most likely out of context.
If that's what he things, so be it. I didn't go into that absolute dumpster-fire of a thread, because I've got better things to lose brain cells over. My opinion has been based on the vast majority of cases on the server. Are there outliers? Probably, but I can't speak to those.

Sorry I can't answer that, I'll just have to refer you back to Faustie on that one.

[Burnett]

[C Lee]

Yes, appoint me owner. Total transparency. As, I and my LimeLight persona believes in. 

We will create the CCP of LimeLight, and it will flourish.

---

I will personally change the staff teams IOR to that of vodka. A nice transparent

Limelight - Link watcher

You're about to enter the following site: Limelight - Link watcher You're about to enter the following site: https://pixelandpoly.com/ior.html Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy. https://pixelandpoly.com/ior.html Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.

1.363. 

---

But on a more serious note. I think the transparency isn't massively convoluted. I feel as though, or at least from my personal interactions. The staff base gives us enough insight into what we need to know concerning community relations etc. 

The problem is, maybe there isn't much for the staff to disclose. Its abundantly clear not enough is happening to keep the community alive, despite some of the best efforts.

Edit: For reason that Burnett says quite well. The need to discuss things like large projects yields great issues. I've seen lots of positive development. But I see no real reason to publish it until its finished, all things considered.