[Rowan]

+support

[Michael]

+Support

[SirWulf]

+Support if it is system that can't be drastically abused.  I don't want to see the entire world on fire.  But I certainly like the idea of random fire generation during times of slowness as long as there is a gag between fires.

[Tawee]

+ Support

[Doodleh]

Huge +Support

Roleplaying as an arsonist is quite expensive right now using molotovs.
I BURNED through 20k in no time.



See the pun I made?

[SixPackSoCali]

+Support

[Rolorox]

Great idea! Lots of support! Moved to popular to help the process move faster.

[Lizard]

+Support

[Maniac]

I'm certain there were spreading fires years back on Fearless. The fires, once spread caused for a lot of lag and mayhem and therefore had to be removed.

+support for the idea, but be warned though. There should definetely be a limit to the spread/max fires.

[hymaan]

+support

[Cameron]

+Support

[SirWulf]

I do like the idea, and I agree that there should be a limit on the spread just so it doesn't go out and cause the entire map to be consumed because of a minge firefighter that is sitting at spawn.

I don't know if it is possible, but perhaps make it so that random generated fires don't destroy player-made props?  That might eliminate some of the chaos pointed out above.

[WildDorito]

+Support

I do like the idea, and I agree that there should be a limit on the spread just so it doesn't go out and cause the entire map to be consumed because of a minge firefighter that is sitting at spawn.

I don't know if it is possible, but perhaps make it so that random generated fires don't destroy player-made props?  That might eliminate some of the chaos pointed out above.

What if the NPC's started the fires before they move? Like, when they are moving to a new location, what if they start a fire in a random building they pass?

[L=I²=Am³]

Huge +Support  8)