Login
Sign Up


You are using the mobile version of the forum, some features have been disabled to have it responsive.
Limelight CityRP - v4b1Limelight CityRP - EU Build
Ares Defence Services DiscordAres Defence Services
Limelight Discord
Limelight CityRP - v4b1Limelight CityRP - EU BuildAres Defence Services DiscordAres Defence ServicesLimelight Discord

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Development Contributor Workflow

receiptHR Blog:

What *are* they doing over there?

receiptTeacher Blog:

Insight into the Teacher Team

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Infrastructure Upgrade 11/2019

receiptDevelopment Blog:

how suggestions???

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Planning for the future.


This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.
Poll: Support?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
+Support
92.86%
13 92.86%
-Support (Please say why)
7.14%
1 7.14%
Total 14 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]


CityRP Re-Balance Less-Lethals (excluding taser)
Soviethooves radio_button_checked
American Player
Media Contractor
Posts: 6,710
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 33
#1
Mar 10, 2019, 08:15 AM
Explain your suggestion, in detail

- Tranq rifle has a chance to not work in 10% increments based on range (100% at melee range, 80% shotgun distance, etc. I don't know how to measure IG and I got a D in Math)
- Tranq rifle knockout time is brought down from 30 seconds on every successful hit to 20 seconds flat. If you land a shot and it works, it will be a 20-second knockout. 
- Tranq rifle will still have a 5-10 second timer before knocking someone out, but on revival, the victim will have a disoriented vision for 5 seconds.
- Tranq rifle has an extended magazine of 3 rounds per magazine

- Beanbag Shotgun can only knockout within a short distance (Normal shotgun damage range)
- Beanbag Shotgun will knock out a person instantly for 30 seconds. ("But that's unfair!" Is it? You have to practically get in the armed suspect's face to have it do anything. Tranq rifles will granted have a chance to not work, but if they do land a hit, they could be the equivalent of a few blocks down and still land a 20-second knockout)
- Beanbag Shotgun victims, when revived from the knockout, will have no after effects

- If the target has kevlar on, there is a 20% chance to negate a tranq (It's a needle type bullet. Shit ain't gonna get through kevlar easily) and will instead leave the target hazy for 5 seconds / With a Beanbag Shotgun, the target has 30% to negate the effects with no after effects

Explain why the suggestion should be implemented:

Currently, the tranq rifle can knock an active shooter out for 30 seconds. The only thing that is nerfed about it is a glitched scope and a 5-10 second window before the victim is incapacitated. The beanbag shotgun is an instant knockout with a chance to fail due to either distance or it simply won't affect the shooter. And if it DOES, they're knocked out for 10-15 seconds. Granted I've had the rare occasion where someone is knocked out with a beanbag for up to 25 seconds, but with a little recent testing, this is indeed RARE. I feel if we're gonna have both these weapons work with each other they need to be level in their own respects. 

With these changes, we'd see less dependence on tranq's in every firefight as they will finally have a negative aspect and a shorter timer. And with the beanbag shotgun, it will no longer only work on occasion when in melee distance. If you fight your way up to a shooter in melee range, you deserve a guaranteed long knockout due to the work it takes to get that close in an engagement.
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
[Image: n0LLhCI.jpg]
(This post was last modified: Feb 3, 2025, 01:07 AM by Doctor Internet. Edited 2 times in total. Edit Reason: Force GitHub Resync )
pufitee radio_button_checked
escaped pigeon
RP Assistant (CityRP)
Posts: 1,144
Threads: 118
Likes Given: 601
Likes Recieved: 948 in 468 posts
Joined: Dec 2017
Reputation: 25
#2
Mar 10, 2019, 08:44 AM
+support

makes sense and its realistic too
[Image: bNevqTZ.png]

[Image: fpJ7oKl.png]
Armard radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 684
Threads: 97
Likes Given: 152
Likes Recieved: 209 in 148 posts
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 5
#3
Mar 14, 2019, 06:50 AM
Why would a tranquliser thats designed for long range sedation be uneffective at long range
The following 4 users Like Armard's post:
  • greg, Kvatch, Lord Octagon, SpaghettiFTW
Soviethooves radio_button_checked
American Player
Media Contractor
Posts: 6,710
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 33
#4
Mar 14, 2019, 08:10 AM
(Mar 14, 2019, 06:50 AM)Armard Wrote: Why would a tranquliser thats designed for long range sedation be uneffective at long range

Balancing purposes and to simulate the velocity of the dart as range increases. Longer you have to fire the less force is put on the dart move forward, causing a loss in penetration capability
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
[Image: n0LLhCI.jpg]
The following 1 user Likes Soviethooves's post:
  • Insert
Limelight Gaming radio_button_checked
Community Management
Posts: 6,037
Threads: 119
Likes Given: 2
Likes Recieved: 135 in 40 posts
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation: 48
#5
Mar 14, 2019, 01:00 PM
Pushing for Staff Review.

#type:[review]
Soviethooves radio_button_checked
American Player
Media Contractor
Posts: 6,710
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 33
#6
Mar 14, 2019, 09:50 PM
@Armard‍ Reason for -Support?
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
[Image: n0LLhCI.jpg]
Armard radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 684
Threads: 97
Likes Given: 152
Likes Recieved: 209 in 148 posts
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 5
#7
Mar 19, 2019, 03:13 AM
(Mar 14, 2019, 09:50 PM)Gungranny Wrote: @Armard‍ Reason for -Support?

My reason still stays
Soviethooves radio_button_checked
American Player
Media Contractor
Posts: 6,710
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 33
#8
Mar 19, 2019, 05:32 AM
(Mar 19, 2019, 03:13 AM)Armard Wrote:
(Mar 14, 2019, 09:50 PM)Gungranny Wrote: @Armard‍ Reason for -Support?

My reason still stays

???
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
[Image: n0LLhCI.jpg]
Doctor Internet radio_button_checked
Management, Developer, Administrator, Business Adviser, DPO, Security
Core Manager
Posts: 12,782
Threads: 1,821
Likes Given: 479
Likes Recieved: 3584 in 1703 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 35
#9
Mar 19, 2019, 12:11 PM
(Mar 19, 2019, 03:13 AM)Armard Wrote:
(Mar 14, 2019, 09:50 PM)Gungranny Wrote: @Armard‍ Reason for -Support?

My reason still stays

thats nice.
what is the reason?
For Data Protection Queries, please email info@limelightgaming.net.
For Business, Contributor or Development queries, please PM me.
For Appeals, please post in the relevant subforum.
For Security Information, your best bet is to speak to Burnett.
The following 1 user Likes Doctor Internet's post:
  • Soviethooves
Armard radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 684
Threads: 97
Likes Given: 152
Likes Recieved: 209 in 148 posts
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 5
#10
Apr 10, 2019, 09:56 PM
(Mar 19, 2019, 12:11 PM)Doctor Internet Wrote:
(Mar 19, 2019, 03:13 AM)Armard Wrote:
(Mar 14, 2019, 09:50 PM)Gungranny Wrote: @Armard‍ Reason for -Support?

My reason still stays

thats nice.
what is the reason?

the reason that i dont agree with them being reducted to rather shorter range then their actual model is designed for, either change the model and scrap the scope entirely or keep it as it is
Soviethooves radio_button_checked
American Player
Media Contractor
Posts: 6,710
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 33
#11
Apr 10, 2019, 11:49 PM
Most tranq rifles irl I’d imagine have less effective penetration as the laws of physics act on it. The model is fine rn.
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
[Image: n0LLhCI.jpg]
Doctor Internet radio_button_checked
Management, Developer, Administrator, Business Adviser, DPO, Security
Core Manager
Posts: 12,782
Threads: 1,821
Likes Given: 479
Likes Recieved: 3584 in 1703 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 35
#12
Apr 24, 2019, 03:10 PM
Approved.
For Data Protection Queries, please email info@limelightgaming.net.
For Business, Contributor or Development queries, please PM me.
For Appeals, please post in the relevant subforum.
For Security Information, your best bet is to speak to Burnett.
The following 1 user Likes Doctor Internet's post:
  • MrJakeeee




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)