[Zaidplays]

2.1 - You are considered to be under FearRP when you are in line of sight of a visibly armed person, who is within default microphone range of you and is able to harm your character at that moment.|[font=Roboto, sans-serif,]2.3 - You may not run away from someone who has you under FearRP and is pointing a gun/taser at you, unless they specifically order you to. [/font]

[SpaghettiFTW]

2.1 - You are considered to be under FearRP when you are in line of sight of a visibly armed person, who is within default microphone range of you and is able to harm your character at that moment.|[font=Roboto, sans-serif,]2.3 - You may not run away from someone who has you under FearRP and is pointing a gun/taser at you, unless they specifically order you to. [/font]

You are considered to not be under fearrp when there is a gunfight, which there was. My life was in danger and complying was no longer an option

[Zaidplays]

2.1 - You are considered to be under FearRP when you are in line of sight of a visibly armed person, who is within default microphone range of you and is able to harm your character at that moment.|[font=Roboto, sans-serif,]2.3 - You may not run away from someone who has you under FearRP and is pointing a gun/taser at you, unless they specifically order you to. [/font]

You are considered to not be under fearrp when there is a gunfight, which there was. My life was in danger and complying was no longer an option

Can you tell me what part of the rules say if there is shooting around you, you aren't under fearRP

[SpaghettiFTW]

https://limelightgaming.net/forums/thread-22146.html

[Zaidplays]

https://limelightgaming.net/forums/thread-22146.html

You have leart the defination that says if you are being shot at directly not if there is shooting around you.

[SpaghettiFTW]

https://limelightgaming.net/forums/thread-22146.html

You have leart the defination that says if you are being shot at directly not if there is shooting around you.

Notice it says similar situations, if a group who is technically the enemy for me is shooting, at my allies, I would not need to follow due to this. I have effectively been harmed because groups work together as one

[Zaidplays]

https://limelightgaming.net/forums/thread-22146.html

You have leart the defination that says if you are being shot at directly not if there is shooting around you.

Notice it says similar situations, if a group who is technically the enemy for me is shooting, at my allies, I would not need to follow due to this. I have effectively been harmed because groups work together as one

No just cause your group is being harmed doesn't mean you are being harmed your twisting this up now

[SpaghettiFTW]

I will leave this PR now, please may an admin respond

[goigle]

Notice it says similar situations, if a group who is technically the enemy for me is shooting, at my allies, I would not need to follow due to this. I have effectively been harmed because groups work together as one

I think that's a big stretch at best.

If someone holding you under FearRP harms you where your character would assume their intent was to kill (in simple terms, if someone who holds you under gunpoint starts shooting you, or similar situations)

Note the parentheses. It's expanding on the harming your character and you assuming they had an intent to kill. The specific example is the person holding you at gunpoint shooting at you. "or similar situations" refers to other ways they could harm you (like throwing a molotov at you or trying to knock you off a building with a baton). There is no mention of friends or allies.


You're held withing spitting distance by a 12 gauge shotgun. You had no reason to run. He could have easily blasted you away, so your character should have been more fearful of the immediate weapon getting fired at you.

Moving away is one thing - if you shifted to the front of the hummer to avoid stray bullets, I could see your point. Running out of cover to pull a weapon on someone who has a shotgun pointed at you is ridiculous.