Login
Sign Up


You are using the mobile version of the forum, some features have been disabled to have it responsive.
Limelight CityRP - v4b1Limelight CityRP - EU Build
Ares Defence Services DiscordAres Defence Services
Limelight Discord
Limelight CityRP - v4b1Limelight CityRP - EU BuildAres Defence Services DiscordAres Defence ServicesLimelight Discord

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Development Contributor Workflow

receiptHR Blog:

What *are* they doing over there?

receiptTeacher Blog:

Insight into the Teacher Team

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Infrastructure Upgrade 11/2019

receiptDevelopment Blog:

how suggestions???

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Planning for the future.


This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Too much armed gearheads
Taylor radio_button_checked
"You are not torturing people in your office"
Contributor
Posts: 3,107
Threads: 178
Likes Given: 2663
Likes Recieved: 2009 in 1224 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 40
#31
Apr 18, 2018, 12:34 AM
(Apr 18, 2018, 12:25 AM)Tyrone DeShawn Wrote:
(Apr 17, 2018, 08:43 PM)Faustin Wrote:
(Apr 17, 2018, 08:29 PM)Gungranny Wrote: I simply see this argument and limited content not being a problem if we simply just goto "CityRP". It's such an easy fix and there are literally no drawbacks other than people not knowing what level of RP they're supposed to be at.

There are some of your suggestions in this thread, for example training police, whitelisting police etc. - personally I would love to see such systems implemented into the gamemode, but the playerbase simple wouldn't cope, you have to remember a very large chunk of the player base is below 15 (hence why a lot of SERIOUS rp servers have an age limit), who would rather run around minted and armed to the teeth than roleplay passively. Which is also why I doubt a police whitelist system would work as a lot of people don't have the patience to sit through training, they want to play as a cop so they should be able to. If they fail to do their job properly the chief has a /demote command for a reason, if they fail to do their job to the point where RP is being disrupted then staff can step in.

We shouldn't be restricted to what content we add based on a tag, granted. It is Limelight's server, therefore it is up to Limelight to interpret Semi-Serious in their own way. Although I do agree removing any tag full stop would solve a lot of problems.

This is gonna sound kinda fucked up but I think we should force people to verify their age before allowing them ti use Kevlar and heavy weaponry, this will increase the server's playability loads.

It might, but there is no way to prove your age unless Limelight added passport verification, so this wouldn’t work
[Image: 800px-PWRR_Tiger.svg.png]
Have I helped you out? Leave a rep!
Memeimrich radio_button_checked
Professional Rule-Follower
Membership
Posts: 156
Threads: 15
Likes Given: 148
Likes Recieved: 78 in 41 posts
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 3
#32
Apr 18, 2018, 06:33 AM
(Apr 18, 2018, 12:34 AM)Faustin Wrote:
(Apr 18, 2018, 12:25 AM)Tyrone DeShawn Wrote:
(Apr 17, 2018, 08:43 PM)Faustin Wrote: -poop-

This is gonna sound kinda fucked up but I think we should force people to verify their age before allowing them ti use Kevlar and heavy weaponry, this will increase the server's playability loads.

It might, but there is no way to prove your age unless Limelight added passport verification, so this wouldn’t work

I ain't got no passport, cuz. Also, RIP Limelight police force.
Signature shows horrific or unneeded disturbing content.

User warned.
The following 2 users Like Memeimrich's post:
  • Soviethooves, Taylor
Insert radio_button_checked
Supervising Teacher
Membership
Posts: 781
Threads: 71
Likes Given: 1236
Likes Recieved: 771 in 381 posts
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 20
#33
Apr 18, 2018, 08:40 AM
(Apr 18, 2018, 12:25 AM)Tyrone DeShawn Wrote:
(Apr 17, 2018, 08:43 PM)Faustin Wrote:
(Apr 17, 2018, 08:29 PM)Gungranny Wrote: I simply see this argument and limited content not being a problem if we simply just goto "CityRP". It's such an easy fix and there are literally no drawbacks other than people not knowing what level of RP they're supposed to be at.

There are some of your suggestions in this thread, for example training police, whitelisting police etc. - personally I would love to see such systems implemented into the gamemode, but the playerbase simple wouldn't cope, you have to remember a very large chunk of the player base is below 15 (hence why a lot of SERIOUS rp servers have an age limit), who would rather run around minted and armed to the teeth than roleplay passively. Which is also why I doubt a police whitelist system would work as a lot of people don't have the patience to sit through training, they want to play as a cop so they should be able to. If they fail to do their job properly the chief has a /demote command for a reason, if they fail to do their job to the point where RP is being disrupted then staff can step in.

We shouldn't be restricted to what content we add based on a tag, granted. It is Limelight's server, therefore it is up to Limelight to interpret Semi-Serious in their own way. Although I do agree removing any tag full stop would solve a lot of problems.

This is gonna sound kinda fucked up but I think we should force people to verify their age before allowing them ti use Kevlar and heavy weaponry, this will increase the server's playability loads.

  1. We would lose nearly half our playerbase.
  2. Age does not define ones ability to roleplay.
  3. It would give age verified players an unfair advantage.
[Image: vfHH2hJ.jpg]
The following 3 users Like Insert's post:
  • francysol3c, Soviethooves, Taylor




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)