[francysol3c]

How about adding a proper system. in which people can candidate for President/Vp and maybe even for congressmen, and allow the president to disable elections to go dictator? Also there should be a global impeachment vote.

[yutgjctguc]

+Support
And make it so they can't unwarrant themselves.

[BasicallyMental]

How about adding a proper system. in which people can candidate for President/Vp and maybe even for congressmen, and allow the president to disable elections to go dictator? Also there should be a global impeachment vote.

This would actually be quite cool, and I recon a lot of people would like this.

[Soviethooves]

+support, though it should be expanded slightly.

Allow the VP to warrant the President, the President to warrant the VP without restriction.
Allow the Sergeant[s] to warrant the President and VP, but requiring (for example) a 80% vote of all active government forces (Fire, EMS, Police and SWAT).

[Nudel]

-snip-

Either that, or get rid of the rule saying that members of the Government are not allowed to harm other members.

It is actually a good idea in some situations. (e.g. a coup)

[Nev]

Not a fan of the idea

-Support

[Stomm]

I support an "easy" way to demote bad Presidents, however I don't want it abused when we have a "good" Dictator who may be making unpopular decisions. As Dictator, they should have complete control over their forces. Which got me thinking....

Last I checked, Admin Permission was needed to go Dictator.

Maybe make a command for the President where they request permission to be a Dictator, and the request gets sent to the admins, who then deny or accept the request (Maybe make it work like the warrant system). If denied, nothing changes, but if it's accepted, then the President/Dictator should be immune to any votes or other "peaceful" methods of removing them from power. So for "Normal" Presidents, they can be removed peacefully, but (admin approved) dictators can only be removed by force.

[Vauld]

I like the direction you're going @Stomm , let me try and piggy-back

Realistically it shouldn't be an admins decision to allow dictatorship RP, it's a completely IG situation. it's just like how arrests are completely IC now - admins shouldn't have to police every single situation on the server to decide whether or not it's "allowed". It makes shit boring.

A solution: How about there's two voting options, dictatorship and demotion. If 80% of the police force agrees to demote, the President is demoted. if 80% agree to a dictatorship, the president can become a dictator. It eliminates the need for admins to police everything, through a clever in-character feature.

I think this is a part of a bigger picture that a lot of issues, a lot of rules that restrict RP and fun, can be met with IC solutions.

[SirWulf]

I like the direction you're going @Stomm , let me try and piggy-back

Realistically it shouldn't be an admins decision to allow dictatorship RP, it's a completely IG situation. it's just like how arrests are completely IC now - admins shouldn't have to police every single situation on the server to decide whether or not it's "allowed". It makes shit boring.

A solution: How about there's two voting options, dictatorship and demotion. If 80% of the police force agrees to demote, the President is demoted. if 80% agree to a dictatorship, the president can become a dictator. It eliminates the need for admins to police everything, through a clever in-character feature.

I think this is a part of a bigger picture that a lot of issues, a lot of rules that restrict RP and fun, can be met with IC solutions.

This thing is, allowing Dictators is basically an event.  This effects everyone on the server as the rules are often RP restrictive until the Dictator is taken out.  That is why permission is required so that Dictators are not the norm hindering proper RP from occurring.

[FINGamer]

+/-I would like to have whole community vote. Then more like overthrow current president. Idea is good, just little change things

[Monkey]

+support

[alan245]

+Support

This system will be required within LL as united state follows capitalism and promote private property right as well as other basic human rights,if the president is willing to become a dictator,he should found if his LEOs support him or even give a large amount of money to buy of their loyalty,and instead of 80%, 2/3 of the Government official will be a lot propitiate.

[alan245]

I like the direction you're going @Stomm , let me try and piggy-back

Realistically it shouldn't be an admins decision to allow dictatorship RP, it's a completely IG situation. it's just like how arrests are completely IC now - admins shouldn't have to police every single situation on the server to decide whether or not it's "allowed". It makes shit boring.

A solution: How about there's two voting options, dictatorship and demotion. If 80% of the police force agrees to demote, the President is demoted. if 80% agree to a dictatorship, the president can become a dictator. It eliminates the need for admins to police everything, through a clever in-character feature.

I think this is a part of a bigger picture that a lot of issues, a lot of rules that restrict RP and fun, can be met with IC solutions.

This thing is, allowing Dictators is basically an event.  This effects everyone on the server as the rules are often RP restrictive until the Dictator is taken out.  That is why permission is required so that Dictators are not the norm hindering proper RP from occurring.

I mean why do United State got Dictator anyway,EvoCity is suppose within the boundary of United Sated not within China.

[Doctor Internet]

Due to the high levels of Popular Support for this suggestion, it has been moved to popular, for further community input.

[Memeboisxd]

-Support