Login
Sign Up


You are using the mobile version of the forum, some features have been disabled to have it responsive.
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight Discord
Ares Defence Services Discord
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight DiscordAres Defence Services Discord

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Development Contributor Workflow

receiptHR Blog:

What *are* they doing over there?

receiptTeacher Blog:

Insight into the Teacher Team

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Infrastructure Upgrade 11/2019

receiptDevelopment Blog:

how suggestions???

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Planning for the future.


This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Terrorism
Ketchup radio_button_checked
epic veteran
Senior Moderator (CityRP)
Posts: 467
Threads: 29
Likes Given: 465
Likes Recieved: 508 in 230 posts
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 13
#1
May 23, 2017, 10:37 PM
The 21st century is of to a BAD start. The main ones that I can think about are 9/11, Westminister attack and Manchester bombing. As well as the Paris shooting. Me personally. I call this time "The Terrorist Age".

What are your thoughts?
[Image: s8L4IOU.png]
Signature & avatar made by Ben
Hungames radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 748
Threads: 69
Likes Given: 493
Likes Recieved: 953 in 427 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 4
#2
May 23, 2017, 11:41 PM
There are way, way, wayyyy more than those few. 30,862 since 9/11 according to https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
[Image: dZVD5wF.png]
rockin the new sig gimme rep
Enzyme radio_button_checked
Supervising Administrator - HR
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,443
Threads: 115
Likes Given: 1110
Likes Recieved: 2721 in 820 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 45
#3
May 24, 2017, 04:13 AM
^This totally seems like a 100% legit and unbiased "newspage".
I'd totally trust everything on that page.

Silly hung... tsk tsk. 
Sincerely, Enzyme
[Image: WWBN6ow.gif]
(This post was last modified: May 24, 2017, 04:13 AM by Enzyme.)
The following 3 users Like Enzyme's post:
  • 26', Nudel, Safira
Hungames radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 748
Threads: 69
Likes Given: 493
Likes Recieved: 953 in 427 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 4
#4
May 24, 2017, 04:23 AM
They were vetted by BBC, you can decide if you trust BBC, and they found they undercounted. Additionally, according to a reputable bias checker, it is left centered meaning relatively no bias, but some leaning towards liberals. Pretty trustworthy for basic statistica
[Image: dZVD5wF.png]
rockin the new sig gimme rep
The following 1 user Likes Hungames's post:
  • 26'
Enzyme radio_button_checked
Supervising Administrator - HR
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,443
Threads: 115
Likes Given: 1110
Likes Recieved: 2721 in 820 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 45
#5
May 24, 2017, 04:32 AM
Looking at their website and the comparisons to christianity, it's already very evident that they are very selective with the information they decide to post.

Looking at the quote-comparisons from the Quran and the bible...
Sure the Quran has some fucked up shit in it, but if this site is such an unbiased news-source then why aren't they critisizing christianity and the bible the same way?

My point here isn't to shit on Christianity. It's to shit on your "unbiased newspage", proving how biased and selective they are with what they choose to share and post. Frankly, sir. That page is 50 shades of bullshit bias and bigotry. 

Personally, I don't believe biased news pages. You might and that's cool, but that shows more of your character than terrorist attacks show how islam is.

Have a good one, @Hungames. I might not have learned anything about the real topic of this thread, but I have learned something about you from your posts on these threads.
Sincerely, Enzyme
[Image: WWBN6ow.gif]
(This post was last modified: May 24, 2017, 04:35 AM by Enzyme.)
The following 1 user Likes Enzyme's post:
  • Nudel
Hungames radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 748
Threads: 69
Likes Given: 493
Likes Recieved: 953 in 427 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 4
#6
May 24, 2017, 04:35 AM
I never claimed it was a newspage. BBC is news, this is focusing on a topic and providing info on it. Sure you can look at it for news of when anew attack has happened, but it isn't an actual newspage.
[Image: dZVD5wF.png]
rockin the new sig gimme rep
Enzyme radio_button_checked
Supervising Administrator - HR
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,443
Threads: 115
Likes Given: 1110
Likes Recieved: 2721 in 820 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 45
#7
May 24, 2017, 04:36 AM
You're treating it as one.

Either the page is unbiased, trustworthy and professional or it's not. You've claimed it is, but I disagree. I know how you're treating it and that's all I need to know about your arguments.
Sincerely, Enzyme
[Image: WWBN6ow.gif]
(This post was last modified: May 24, 2017, 04:37 AM by Enzyme.)
The following 1 user Likes Enzyme's post:
  • Nudel
Hungames radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 748
Threads: 69
Likes Given: 493
Likes Recieved: 953 in 427 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 4
#8
May 24, 2017, 04:40 AM
I never treated it as a news page. Using it as a source of statistics, not news articles. It's the complete opposite of a news page. Gonna stop arguing this since it's slightly off the main topic
[Image: dZVD5wF.png]
rockin the new sig gimme rep




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)