Limelight Forums

Full Version: Terrorism
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
The 21st century is of to a BAD start. The main ones that I can think about are 9/11, Westminister attack and Manchester bombing. As well as the Paris shooting. Me personally. I call this time "The Terrorist Age".

What are your thoughts?
There are way, way, wayyyy more than those few. 30,862 since 9/11 according to https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
^This totally seems like a 100% legit and unbiased "newspage".
I'd totally trust everything on that page.

Silly hung... tsk tsk. 
They were vetted by BBC, you can decide if you trust BBC, and they found they undercounted. Additionally, according to a reputable bias checker, it is left centered meaning relatively no bias, but some leaning towards liberals. Pretty trustworthy for basic statistica
Looking at their website and the comparisons to christianity, it's already very evident that they are very selective with the information they decide to post.

Looking at the quote-comparisons from the Quran and the bible...
Sure the Quran has some fucked up shit in it, but if this site is such an unbiased news-source then why aren't they critisizing christianity and the bible the same way?

My point here isn't to shit on Christianity. It's to shit on your "unbiased newspage", proving how biased and selective they are with what they choose to share and post. Frankly, sir. That page is 50 shades of bullshit bias and bigotry. 

Personally, I don't believe biased news pages. You might and that's cool, but that shows more of your character than terrorist attacks show how islam is.

Have a good one, . I might not have learned anything about the real topic of this thread, but I have learned something about you from your posts on these threads.
I never claimed it was a newspage. BBC is news, this is focusing on a topic and providing info on it. Sure you can look at it for news of when anew attack has happened, but it isn't an actual newspage.
You're treating it as one.

Either the page is unbiased, trustworthy and professional or it's not. You've claimed it is, but I disagree. I know how you're treating it and that's all I need to know about your arguments.
I never treated it as a news page. Using it as a source of statistics, not news articles. It's the complete opposite of a news page. Gonna stop arguing this since it's slightly off the main topic