Login
Sign Up


You are using the mobile version of the forum, some features have been disabled to have it responsive.
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight Discord
Ares Defence Services Discord
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight DiscordAres Defence Services Discord

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Development Contributor Workflow

receiptHR Blog:

What *are* they doing over there?

receiptTeacher Blog:

Insight into the Teacher Team

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Infrastructure Upgrade 11/2019

receiptDevelopment Blog:

how suggestions???

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Planning for the future.


This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

[16/05/17 Updated] Rule Changes
Overlewd radio_button_checked
Superlewd now
Media Contractor
Posts: 3,088
Threads: 215
Likes Given: 469
Likes Recieved: 2158 in 699 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 23
#1
May 9, 2017, 01:56 AM
Hello community! I am glad to announce that after internal discussion it was decided to make adjustments to the current ruleset on the server to help fill any common grey areas that often cause issued and misunderstandings, particularly with our newer players. If you are fairly experienced with the gamemode you will find that most of these things have been enforced for a long time and not much has changed.

You can find the exact changes in the spoiler at the bottom, but here’s a tl;dr of the changes:

1)   Changed FearRP rule to reflect that it applies to guns on safety.
2)   Clarified NLR and /job usage.
3)   Added the “FailRP” government rules about killing those who don’t pose a threat.
4)   Added the “FailRP” crime rules about mugging as Corleone and baiting.
5)   Completely rewritten the doomforting rule so it is understandable to people unfamiliar with the term.
6)   Added clarification on the way arrests are handled in terms of IC and OOC/@.





As of 16/05/17:

6.7 Do not try to get on to rooftops; do not build on them either. 
6.7a Exception: You may place a new billboard/sign on top of the existing billboards. 

HAVE BEEN REPLACED WITH:

6.7 You may get up to rooftops if you have a valid RP reason to do so. You may only use the ladder tool to reach rooftops
and the act must be roleplayed out (no magic ladders out of nowhere mid-raid, for example). You may build on rooftops,
however defensive fortifications or contraband are not allowed.
6.7a You may reach rooftops via means other than a ladder if a staff member approves of it (must look realistic).
6.7b Tides/Empires hotel roof in city is off limits, do not attempt to get up there.

Hopefully this change allows for some interesting Roleplays that previously would not have been allowed.
<p><br></p>
(This post was last modified: May 16, 2017, 06:10 PM by Overlewd.)
The following 11 users Like Overlewd's post:
  • 26', alan245, BasicallyMental, Dig, Enzyme, Night, Nudel, Raptor, Ratatoskrr, yutgjctguc, Zona
Cooli radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 1,997
Threads: 88
Likes Given: 447
Likes Recieved: 823 in 616 posts
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation: 24
#2
May 9, 2017, 02:00 AM
Good to finaly see grey zones dissapear.
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2017, 02:00 AM by Cooli.)
Zambie ^‿^ radio_button_checked
The inactive cunt
Contributor
Posts: 452
Threads: 51
Likes Given: 96
Likes Recieved: 382 in 276 posts
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation: 5
#3
May 9, 2017, 02:21 AM
This will help others understand the rules a little bit more.

Good decision, you lil' democratic decision makers in the forums hidden from us peasants.
[Image: vvsPXMo.png]

26' radio_button_checked
Space Cowboy
Veteran Member
Posts: 300
Threads: 15
Likes Given: 252
Likes Recieved: 297 in 115 posts
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation: 13
#4
May 9, 2017, 02:32 AM
Very nice.
SourLemon radio_button_checked
American Person
Membership
Posts: 301
Threads: 22
Likes Given: 326
Likes Recieved: 480 in 164 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 1
#5
May 9, 2017, 03:04 AM
So the rule says within range, so can i put cops across the lake under fearrp with my awp??????????
[Image: 0LOloTa.jpg]
The following 2 users Like SourLemon's post:
  • Dan, Nudel
yutgjctguc radio_button_checked
Finnish LimeLight donator
Membership
Posts: 2,247
Threads: 262
Likes Given: 2544
Likes Recieved: 638 in 511 posts
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation: 19
#6
May 9, 2017, 11:19 AM
[Image: dO1EQ6z.png]
Not sure but I think that should be 2017?
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2017, 11:20 AM by yutgjctguc. Edited 1 time in total.)
Temar radio_button_checked
Owner
Owner
Posts: 1,114
Threads: 123
Likes Given: 152
Likes Recieved: 1116 in 276 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 23
#7
May 9, 2017, 11:27 AM
The general rule is that the year to include in a copyright notice is the year of first publication of the work. First publication is when the work is made available to the public without restriction. This includes selling a book or leaving free copies of it in a public place or posting content on your blog.
The following 1 user Likes Temar's post:
  • yutgjctguc
Wesley Lawrence radio_button_checked
Veteran
Veteran Member
Posts: 1,171
Threads: 37
Likes Given: 1303
Likes Recieved: 1063 in 602 posts
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation: 25
#8
May 9, 2017, 12:08 PM
Nice to see some of the grey areas regarding rules get solved. The safety part in FearRP is going to be a big help as well, as some people didn't seem to understand it's just a button or switch you click or flick and you're ready to fire.
13.4, 13.4b and 15.6 are good ones as well.  Smile

[Image: 5H73Ev1.gif]
Nudel radio_button_checked
nuh uh
Mission Support (ADS)
Posts: 3,061
Threads: 181
Likes Given: 8781
Likes Recieved: 2111 in 1294 posts
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation: 52
#9
May 9, 2017, 12:15 PM
It was needed.
yutgjctguc radio_button_checked
Finnish LimeLight donator
Membership
Posts: 2,247
Threads: 262
Likes Given: 2544
Likes Recieved: 638 in 511 posts
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation: 19
#10
May 9, 2017, 01:01 PM
(May 9, 2017, 11:27 AM)Temar Wrote: The general rule is that the year to include in a copyright notice is the year of first publication of the work. First publication is when the work is made available to the public without restriction. This includes selling a book or leaving free copies of it in a public place or posting content on your blog.
Oh, ok, my bad
Overlewd radio_button_checked
Superlewd now
Media Contractor
Posts: 3,088
Threads: 215
Likes Given: 469
Likes Recieved: 2158 in 699 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 23
#11
May 9, 2017, 01:08 PM
(May 9, 2017, 03:04 AM)SourLemon Wrote: So the rule says within range, so can i put cops across the lake under fearrp with my awp??????????

Adorable loophole but I thought about up this one myself and no, obviously you can't. You could ask that same question with the old rules as "under gunpoint" didnt specify range either.

Be reasonable :>

Edit: There's also the problem of actually seeing the person's weapon at that distance, at which point he's not necessarily "visibly" armed anymore. Microphone range (maybe /y) is a good indicator for most situations I'd say.
<p><br></p>
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2017, 03:09 PM by Overlewd.)
The following 1 user Likes Overlewd's post:
  • yutgjctguc
Dick radio_button_checked
Supervising Administrator
Supervising Administrator (ADS)
Posts: 4,631
Threads: 461
Likes Given: 1822
Likes Recieved: 1907 in 1237 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 25
#12
May 9, 2017, 03:07 PM
(May 9, 2017, 03:04 AM)SourLemon Wrote: So the rule says within range, so can i put cops across the lake under fearrp with my awp??????????

FearRP is usually generally when someone says something or pointing at them generally. So the AWP wouldn't work like that because the point would require to know your orders/location to be able to follow under FearRP. Good thought doe :3
[Image: EnzxzUF.png]
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2017, 03:07 PM by Dick.)
Insert radio_button_checked
Supervising Teacher
Membership
Posts: 781
Threads: 71
Likes Given: 1236
Likes Recieved: 771 in 381 posts
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 20
#13
May 9, 2017, 03:10 PM
A few new rules today, keeps the minges away.
[Image: vfHH2hJ.jpg]
SourLemon radio_button_checked
American Person
Membership
Posts: 301
Threads: 22
Likes Given: 326
Likes Recieved: 480 in 164 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 1
#14
May 9, 2017, 03:27 PM
(May 9, 2017, 01:08 PM)Overlewd Wrote:
(May 9, 2017, 03:04 AM)SourLemon Wrote: So the rule says within range, so can i put cops across the lake under fearrp with my awp??????????

Adorable loophole but I thought about up this one myself and no, obviously you can't. You could ask that same question with the old rules as "under gunpoint" didnt specify range either.

Be reasonable :>

Edit: There's also the problem of actually seeing the person's weapon at that distance, at which point he's not necessarily "visibly" armed anymore. Microphone range (maybe /y) is a good indicator for most situations I'd say.
I can pretty easily tell if someone is armed from quite a distance. So would it be better to have the rule state that it is within mic distance instead of visible? I mean we are trying to prevent grey areas correct? Wink
[Image: 0LOloTa.jpg]
The following 1 user Likes SourLemon's post:
  • Dan
Overlewd radio_button_checked
Superlewd now
Media Contractor
Posts: 3,088
Threads: 215
Likes Given: 469
Likes Recieved: 2158 in 699 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 23
#15
May 9, 2017, 03:53 PM
(May 9, 2017, 03:27 PM)SourLemon Wrote:
(May 9, 2017, 01:08 PM)Overlewd Wrote:
(May 9, 2017, 03:04 AM)SourLemon Wrote: So the rule says within range, so can i put cops across the lake under fearrp with my awp??????????

Adorable loophole but I thought about up this one myself and no, obviously you can't. You could ask that same question with the old rules as "under gunpoint" didnt specify range either.

Be reasonable :>

Edit: There's also the problem of actually seeing the person's weapon at that distance, at which point he's not necessarily "visibly" armed anymore. Microphone range (maybe /y) is a good indicator for most situations I'd say.
I can pretty easily tell if someone is armed from quite a distance. So would it be better to have the rule state that it is within mic distance instead of visible? I mean we are trying to prevent grey areas correct? Wink
That's not exactly a grey area anymore it's just trying to find loopholes. When someone is pointing a gun at you from that distance you don't know if they want you to freeze or gtfo or something else, so FearRP can't possibly apply. Also there are many ways you can counter-loophole your loophole with another loophole which I won't go into because let's not.
<p><br></p>




Users browsing this thread: