Login
Sign Up


You are using the mobile version of the forum, some features have been disabled to have it responsive.
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight Discord
Ares Defence Services Discord
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight DiscordAres Defence Services Discord

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Development Contributor Workflow

receiptHR Blog:

What *are* they doing over there?

receiptTeacher Blog:

Insight into the Teacher Team

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Infrastructure Upgrade 11/2019

receiptDevelopment Blog:

how suggestions???

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Planning for the future.


This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Closed 
Rule 12.8a
Taylor radio_button_checked
"You are not torturing people in your office"
Contributor
Posts: 3,089
Threads: 177
Likes Given: 2639
Likes Recieved: 1991 in 1215 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 40
#1
Aug 21, 2016, 11:47 PM
So I noticed this rule the other day and just wanted to clarify something regarding it.

"12.8 Do not kill or injure any other government member.
12.8a Exception: If an officer or SWAT officer is attempting to take your life or that of innocent people, you may use force to stop them. "

Does this rule mean if and officer kills and innocent person I can spray them as SWAT?
[Image: 800px-PWRR_Tiger.svg.png]
Have I helped you out? Leave a rep!
Zambie ^‿^ radio_button_checked
The inactive cunt
Contributor
Posts: 452
Threads: 51
Likes Given: 96
Likes Recieved: 382 in 276 posts
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation: 5
#2
Aug 21, 2016, 11:50 PM
Common sense would be it, if an officer commuted murder on a innocent woman he would eventually be arrested and charged,

however I guess if the officer doesn't drop his firearm when required and it's endangering yourself and others then yes.
Even though it conflicts with Teamkill, that argument there should override it.
[Image: vvsPXMo.png]

The following 1 user Likes Zambie ^‿^'s post:
  • Taylor
Brax radio_button_checked
Former Teacher & Contributor
Membership
Posts: 823
Threads: 33
Likes Given: 563
Likes Recieved: 452 in 315 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 14
#3
Aug 21, 2016, 11:51 PM
No, that would be violating the Teamkilling rule. No Friendly Fire, even if a cop sprays down a bunch of innocents. In that case, notify their Sergeant or the President for a demotion, or a Staff Member if its breaking rules
[Image: 8UKYGXX.png]
The following 1 user Likes Brax's post:
  • Taylor
Innovative radio_button_checked
Graphic Designer @ Media Team
Membership
Posts: 622
Threads: 55
Likes Given: 351
Likes Recieved: 344 in 185 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 7
#4
Aug 21, 2016, 11:53 PM
Well the rules show an exception, so Yes, if there is a rogue officer, you may use lethal force as self defence.
[Image: b5Aid48.gif]
The following 1 user Likes Innovative's post:
  • Taylor
Nev radio_button_checked
Real Estate Developer // Architect
Veteran Member
Posts: 1,071
Threads: 180
Likes Given: 217
Likes Recieved: 1527 in 599 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 14
#5
Aug 21, 2016, 11:55 PM
Depends on the context.

The rule was made to allow officers to take measures into their hands when another government members is a direct threat to innocent lives. If he is actively pursuing innocent civilians, by all means take him down. If he is actively trying to kill government members, spray away. If he killed someone and is no longer a threat, you cannot just kill him.

This is a rule to prevent mass-shootings. Also note that it is important to be certain that he is killing someone who isn't a threat as you may not always know the context of a situation if you just see an officer and/or SWAT shooting at a person.

(Aug 21, 2016, 11:51 PM)Brax Wrote: No, that would be violating the Teamkilling rule. No Friendly Fire, even if a cop sprays down a bunch of innocents. In that case, notify their Sergeant or the President for a demotion, or a Staff Member if its breaking rules

Brax, if you check the rules there is an exception that allows a government member to team kill.
(This post was last modified: Aug 21, 2016, 11:56 PM by Nev.)
The following 2 users Like Nev's post:
  • Overlewd, Taylor
Brax radio_button_checked
Former Teacher & Contributor
Membership
Posts: 823
Threads: 33
Likes Given: 563
Likes Recieved: 452 in 315 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 14
#6
Aug 21, 2016, 11:55 PM
Well shit, apparently I was wrong. Whenever I've seen SWAT or a fellow Officer kill another its been an OOC punishable offense so
[Image: 8UKYGXX.png]
The following 1 user Likes Brax's post:
  • Taylor
Taylor radio_button_checked
"You are not torturing people in your office"
Contributor
Posts: 3,089
Threads: 177
Likes Given: 2639
Likes Recieved: 1991 in 1215 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 40
#7
Aug 21, 2016, 11:59 PM
@Zambie ^‿^ @"Nevy" @Innovative @Brax

Thank all of you for your responses. Big Grin
[Image: 800px-PWRR_Tiger.svg.png]
Have I helped you out? Leave a rep!
Innovative radio_button_checked
Graphic Designer @ Media Team
Membership
Posts: 622
Threads: 55
Likes Given: 351
Likes Recieved: 344 in 185 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 7
#8
Aug 21, 2016, 11:59 PM
Answered and Moved to archive
[Image: b5Aid48.gif]
Closed 




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)