[Doctor Internet]

If you're looking at the reason that a player posted the suggestion, as opposed to the suggestion itself, you're missing the point.

Vote on the merits of the suggestion, its impact ingame and your opinions of the suggestion.
Not whether your -support will "own the libs".

Those that have -supported, (@BlackDog, @ForceGhost, @Gungranny, @Lewwings77, @Lord Octagon, @Nebula, @Nev, @Night, @pufitee, @Rydolph, @Theo), if the above statement applies to you, you have 24 hours to substantiate your -support.

Until that time, this thread will not be processed by either the bot or staff members.

Thank you.

[Night]

I see little reason to change it, seems rather pointless to me.

-supp

[Lord Octagon]

I literally 'substantiated' my 'opinion' after it.

It's a stupid thing to make a big deal out of, it shouldn't be changed, this suggestion sucks.

-support

Does that fulfil all the requisites for a 'valid' vote m'lud? Or are you just trying to exclude votes for no reason.

[Nudel]

If you're looking at the reason that a player posted the suggestion, as opposed to the suggestion itself, you're missing the point.

Vote on the merits of the suggestion, its impact ingame and your opinions of the suggestion.
Not whether your -support will "own the libs".

Those that have -supported, (@BlackDog, @ForceGhost, @Gungranny, @Lewwings77, @Lord Octagon, @Nebula, @Nev, @Night, @pufitee, @Rydolph, @Theo), if the above statement applies to you, you have 24 hours to substantiate your -support.

Until that time, this thread will not be processed by either the bot or staff members.

Thank you.

Sounds like communism.

OT: Changing to -support.

[Pollux]

It legit doesn't take long to change it, there's zero reason to -support this like seriously.

[Reebs]

This is a 20 minute job max, and firefighter is the professional title.

Excuse you sir? The correct job title is Fire Suppression Engineer. 

All jokes aside, +Support

Not only would it make everything more inclusive, it just looks better to be honest.

[Montyfatcat]

I'm +support-ing this:

Not for a left-wing agenda

Not because I'm offended

Not exclusively for inclusiveness (Although it is a nice perk)

But because it's a professional title, and is aesthetic

[Nebula]

If you're looking at the reason that a player posted the suggestion, as opposed to the suggestion itself, you're missing the point.

Vote on the merits of the suggestion, its impact ingame and your opinions of the suggestion.
Not whether your -support will "own the libs".

Those that have -supported, (@BlackDog, @ForceGhost, @Gungranny, @Lewwings77, @Lord Octagon, @Nebula, @Nev, @Night, @pufitee, @Rydolph, @Theo), if the above statement applies to you, you have 24 hours to substantiate your -support.

Until that time, this thread will not be processed by either the bot or staff members.

Thank you.

Impact Ingame: Literally none
My own opinion: Do /job & /teamname if it bugs you. It's something so little it's really unnecesessary.

[pufitee]

If you're looking at the reason that a player posted the suggestion, as opposed to the suggestion itself, you're missing the point.

Vote on the merits of the suggestion, its impact ingame and your opinions of the suggestion.
Not whether your -support will "own the libs".

Those that have -supported, (@BlackDog, @ForceGhost, @Gungranny, @Lewwings77, @Lord Octagon, @Nebula, @Nev, @Night, @pufitee, @Rydolph, @Theo), if the above statement applies to you, you have 24 hours to substantiate your -support.

Until that time, this thread will not be processed by either the bot or staff members.

Thank you.

no.

[Doctor Internet]

I literally 'substantiated' my 'opinion' after it.

It's a stupid thing to make a big deal out of, it shouldn't be changed, this suggestion sucks.

-support

Does that fulfil all the requisites for a 'valid' vote m'lud? Or are you just trying to exclude votes for no reason.

I'm trying to ensure that the votes aren't just trolling. As users seemed so incensed by the possibility of banned players posting here due to the risk of troll votes, the same has to be extended otherwise.

Furthermore, I haven't yet gone through the thread, so if you'd substantiated your opinion prior, that's fine. I hadn't read it yet, and would be fine when I went through tomorrow.

Lastly, there really was no need for the sarcasm, was there?

[Lewwings]

@Doctor Internet‍

My reasoning is clear and "substantiate" enough in my original comment, I also agree with what Nebula has said (and liked the post to make this clear), my -support still stands.

[Doctor Internet]

My reasoning is clear and "substantiate" enough in my original comment, I also agree with what Nebula has said (and liked the post to make this clear), my -support still stands.

Please see my reply to Lord Octagon.

Specifically, the line reading, "Furthermore, I haven't yet gone through the thread, so if you'd substantiated your opinion prior, that's fine. I hadn't read it yet, and would be fine when I went through tomorrow."

[ForceGhost]

-Support

Both terms are acceptable, but are we really going to spend valuable development time on making a job title more "Politicaly Correct"?


[video=youtube]http://https://youtu.be/G9n8Xp8DWf8[/video]

“Political correctness is America's newest form of intolerance, and it is especially pernicious because it comes disguised as tolerance. It presents itself as fairness, yet attempts to restrict and control people's language with strict codes and rigid rules. I'm not sure that's the way to fight discrimination. I'm not sure silencing people or forcing them to alter their speech is the best method for solving problems that go much deeper than speech.”

― George Carlin"

Sums it up perfectly.

[Welker]

+support. Sounds better

[Dan]

Fuck feminism
Fuck the liberals
Fuck political correctness 

The more professional term is Firefighter so that’s how it should be.
I’m sure it takes 2 minutes to make this change.
+support