Login
Sign Up


You are using the mobile version of the forum, some features have been disabled to have it responsive.
Limelight CityRP - v4b1Limelight CityRP - EU Build
Ares Defence Services DiscordAres Defence Services
Limelight Discord
Limelight CityRP - v4b1Limelight CityRP - EU BuildAres Defence Services DiscordAres Defence ServicesLimelight Discord

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Development Contributor Workflow

receiptHR Blog:

What *are* they doing over there?

receiptTeacher Blog:

Insight into the Teacher Team

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Infrastructure Upgrade 11/2019

receiptDevelopment Blog:

how suggestions???

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Planning for the future.


This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.
Poll: What's your opinion on this?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
+ Support
88.57%
31 88.57%
- Support
11.43%
4 11.43%
Total 35 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]


CityRP FA:S Medkit
PaulB radio_button_checked
Developer
Veteran Member
Posts: 857
Threads: 62
Likes Given: 471
Likes Recieved: 519 in 277 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 14
#31
Sep 6, 2016, 03:09 PM
(Sep 6, 2016, 03:04 PM)Soviethooves Wrote:
(Sep 6, 2016, 01:55 PM)Faustin Wrote:
(Sep 6, 2016, 05:27 AM)Soviethooves Wrote:
(Sep 6, 2016, 01:29 AM)Faustin Wrote: I hate to be 'that guy' but can I just point out how this is Semi Serious? There are still allowed to be unrealistic things.

We're going off of how we can fix players from soaking up bullets.

If the guns had realistic weapon damage the players wouldn't soak up bullets at they would be dead instantly.

However, Agressive players would lose interest very quickly if they realized this. 
Plus shootouts wouldn't be fun anymore. Yes 30 minute standoffs aren't fun, but 5-10 minutes? That's a good time.
At the current moment you could spray a entire mag of the UMP into a guy with Ceramic and I think he'll just go down to 30HP as well as P.O's Glocks which are practically pea-shooters against Kevlar.
[Image: sigs.php?steamid=STEAM_0:0:81010017&t=2]
Taylor radio_button_checked
"You are not torturing people in your office"
Contributor
Posts: 3,153
Threads: 181
Likes Given: 2714
Likes Recieved: 2056 in 1255 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 44
#32
Sep 6, 2016, 05:54 PM
(Sep 6, 2016, 03:04 PM)Soviethooves Wrote:
(Sep 6, 2016, 01:55 PM)Faustin Wrote:
(Sep 6, 2016, 05:27 AM)Soviethooves Wrote:
(Sep 6, 2016, 01:29 AM)Faustin Wrote: I hate to be 'that guy' but can I just point out how this is Semi Serious? There are still allowed to be unrealistic things.

We're going off of how we can fix players from soaking up bullets.

If the guns had realistic weapon damage the players wouldn't soak up bullets at they would be dead instantly.

However, Agressive players would lose interest very quickly if they realized this. 
Plus shootouts wouldn't be fun anymore. Yes 30 minute standoffs aren't fun, but 5-10 minutes? That's a good time.

In real life do you think shootouts are fun? Like cops ENJOY watching their colleagues die? I think not. Anyways, to stop Aggressive players losing interest maybe there could be some kind of new rule to disallow just rushing into a raid alone with no real strategy. 

TL;DR If there were rules supporting the idea of tactics, this would not only make raids more realistic but also give the criminals the feel of a challenge.
[Image: 800px-PWRR_Tiger.svg.png]
Have I helped you out? Leave a rep!
BlackDog radio_button_checked
Veteran
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,727
Threads: 49
Likes Given: 0
Likes Recieved: 1303 in 662 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 20
#33
Sep 6, 2016, 06:10 PM
(Sep 6, 2016, 05:54 PM)Faustin Wrote: In real life do you think shootouts are fun? Like cops ENJOY watching their colleagues die? I think not. Anyways, to stop Aggressive players losing interest maybe there could be some kind of new rule to disallow just rushing into a raid alone with no real strategy. 

TL;DR If there were rules supporting the idea of tactics, this would not only make raids more realistic but also give the criminals the feel of a challenge.




No, and no, we do not need rules dictating how you need to act during combat, if someone wants to take a suicidal gamble,that is THEIR choice.

Rules dictating how combat will play out like this will just lead to many people being punished for the idea that "They didnt use realistic tactics" or ruin the fun of a combat situation as players will always have the thought in their head "Ohh no i better make it look like my tactics are realistic, because i dont wana get in trouble"

Id like you to define realistic tactics, because tactics are what you make of them, and if they work they work if they dont they dont, its a complete crapshoot if your plan works.
[Image: 48d63884162a5acbea739f54e3909f3c.jpg]
The following 3 users Like BlackDog's post:
  • Soviethooves, Wesley Lawrence, Zeyon
Wesley Lawrence radio_button_checked
Veteran
Veteran Member
Posts: 1,171
Threads: 37
Likes Given: 1303
Likes Recieved: 1063 in 602 posts
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation: 25
#34
Sep 6, 2016, 06:11 PM
(Sep 6, 2016, 05:54 PM)Faustin Wrote:
(Sep 6, 2016, 03:04 PM)Soviethooves Wrote:
(Sep 6, 2016, 01:55 PM)Faustin Wrote:
(Sep 6, 2016, 05:27 AM)Soviethooves Wrote:
(Sep 6, 2016, 01:29 AM)Faustin Wrote: I hate to be 'that guy' but can I just point out how this is Semi Serious? There are still allowed to be unrealistic things.

We're going off of how we can fix players from soaking up bullets.

If the guns had realistic weapon damage the players wouldn't soak up bullets at they would be dead instantly.

However, Agressive players would lose interest very quickly if they realized this. 
Plus shootouts wouldn't be fun anymore. Yes 30 minute standoffs aren't fun, but 5-10 minutes? That's a good time.

In real life do you think shootouts are fun? Like cops ENJOY watching their colleagues die? I think not. Anyways, to stop Aggressive players losing interest maybe there could be some kind of new rule to disallow just rushing into a raid alone with no real strategy. 

TL;DR If there were rules supporting the idea of tactics, this would not only make raids more realistic but also give the criminals the feel of a challenge.

Rules supporting the idea of tactics? -support
Tactics are something that a player wishes to use or not use. Adding a rule enforcing, basically pushing them into using them, is not necessary in my opinion.

Also, you might want to think over how you structure a sentence. I don't enjoy reading how you ask people if real life shoot-outs are fun and whether or not they think officers watching their buddies die is enjoyable. Let's keep this on-topic and towards the subject the suggestion is about. Opinions are fine, of course, but no need for this.

[Image: 5H73Ev1.gif]
The following 1 user Likes Wesley Lawrence's post:
  • Soviethooves
Taylor radio_button_checked
"You are not torturing people in your office"
Contributor
Posts: 3,153
Threads: 181
Likes Given: 2714
Likes Recieved: 2056 in 1255 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 44
#35
Sep 6, 2016, 09:32 PM
(Sep 6, 2016, 06:10 PM)BlackDog Wrote:
(Sep 6, 2016, 05:54 PM)Faustin Wrote: In real life do you think shootouts are fun? Like cops ENJOY watching their colleagues die? I think not. Anyways, to stop Aggressive players losing interest maybe there could be some kind of new rule to disallow just rushing into a raid alone with no real strategy. 

TL;DR If there were rules supporting the idea of tactics, this would not only make raids more realistic but also give the criminals the feel of a challenge.




No, and no, we do not need rules dictating how you need to act during combat, if someone wants to take a suicidal gamble,that is THEIR choice.

Rules dictating how combat will play out like this will just lead to many people being punished for the idea that "They didnt use realistic tactics" or ruin the fun of a combat situation as players will always have the thought in their head "Ohh no i better make it look like my tactics are realistic, because i dont wana get in trouble"

Id like you to define realistic tactics, because tactics are what you make of them, and if they work they work if they dont they dont, its a complete crapshoot if your plan works.

It would be FailRP, no? Tell me. How many cops do you see irl running in to a raid on his own when he is clearly outnumbered and has no strategy to his plan.
[Image: 800px-PWRR_Tiger.svg.png]
Have I helped you out? Leave a rep!
Toxic radio_button_checked
Certified flyboi
Veteran Member
Posts: 1,332
Threads: 44
Likes Given: 525
Likes Recieved: 1284 in 762 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 15
#36
Sep 6, 2016, 09:39 PM
Well for a start I suppose we should ban all of the ATF agents involved in the Waco raid for FAILRP tactics.
[Image: FhOfSGo.png]
(This post was last modified: Sep 6, 2016, 10:07 PM by Toxic.)
The following 1 user Likes Toxic's post:
  • Wesley Lawrence
Lizard radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 374
Threads: 27
Likes Given: 163
Likes Recieved: 98 in 49 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 3
#37
Sep 6, 2016, 10:54 PM
+Support
 [Image: Mz3ngnM.png]
Thanks for the Signature Bambo!
BlackDog radio_button_checked
Veteran
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,727
Threads: 49
Likes Given: 0
Likes Recieved: 1303 in 662 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 20
#38
Sep 6, 2016, 11:03 PM
Another combat situation today between me, Zeyon and lizard, not sure which i was fighting with but the issue arose again, me and the target reached a stalemate because we each could heal up so fast that no one could make any real damage stick, my AWM would hit him, hewould heal, his sniper rounds would hit me, and id just heal up.


We need this medkit ASAP
[Image: 48d63884162a5acbea739f54e3909f3c.jpg]
(This post was last modified: Sep 7, 2016, 12:05 AM by BlackDog.)
Taylor radio_button_checked
"You are not torturing people in your office"
Contributor
Posts: 3,153
Threads: 181
Likes Given: 2714
Likes Recieved: 2056 in 1255 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 44
#39
Sep 7, 2016, 12:05 AM
I know I've gone on about realism to the point where it is pissing a lot of people of, but if you get shot anywhere other than your limbs you're not going to be able to just apply a bandage to a bullet hole through you're skull. -Support
[Image: 800px-PWRR_Tiger.svg.png]
Have I helped you out? Leave a rep!
BlackDog radio_button_checked
Veteran
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,727
Threads: 49
Likes Given: 0
Likes Recieved: 1303 in 662 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 20
#40
Sep 7, 2016, 12:05 AM
lol my bad, ZEYON, typo corrected
[Image: 48d63884162a5acbea739f54e3909f3c.jpg]
Soviethooves radio_button_checked
American Player
Media Contractor
Posts: 6,710
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 33
#41
Sep 7, 2016, 12:51 AM
(Sep 6, 2016, 09:32 PM)Faustin Wrote:
(Sep 6, 2016, 06:10 PM)BlackDog Wrote:
(Sep 6, 2016, 05:54 PM)Faustin Wrote: In real life do you think shootouts are fun? Like cops ENJOY watching their colleagues die? I think not. Anyways, to stop Aggressive players losing interest maybe there could be some kind of new rule to disallow just rushing into a raid alone with no real strategy. 

TL;DR If there were rules supporting the idea of tactics, this would not only make raids more realistic but also give the criminals the feel of a challenge.




No, and no, we do not need rules dictating how you need to act during combat, if someone wants to take a suicidal gamble,that is THEIR choice.

Rules dictating how combat will play out like this will just lead to many people being punished for the idea that "They didnt use realistic tactics" or ruin the fun of a combat situation as players will always have the thought in their head "Ohh no i better make it look like my tactics are realistic, because i dont wana get in trouble"

Id like you to define realistic tactics, because tactics are what you make of them, and if they work they work if they dont they dont, its a complete crapshoot if your plan works.

It would be FailRP, no? Tell me. How many cops do you see irl running in to a raid on his own when he is clearly outnumbered and has no strategy to his plan.

You see....there is a line between FailRP and constricting a players freedom. In a way, running and gunning IS a realistic tactic. May not be in your book, but in Jim's (Just an example) he sees it as a last minute decision point strategy to rush the enemy and attack before they notice his movements. 

Also, 1 shots kills are a little overkill. The server is meant to be fun and fair, not as realistic as possible. If you wish for that, make a discussion for opening a new City RP Serious Server.
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
[Image: n0LLhCI.jpg]
(This post was last modified: Sep 7, 2016, 12:52 AM by Soviethooves.)
Markus radio_button_checked
Roleplayin' since 2011
Contributor
Posts: 1,829
Threads: 184
Likes Given: 2146
Likes Recieved: 626 in 410 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 14
#42
Sep 7, 2016, 04:24 PM
+Support

On another note: ISIS lost its Turkish borde, essentially isolating it from the outside world. Hurray!
[Image: sigs.php?steamid=STEAM_0:1:36038228]
Toxic radio_button_checked
Certified flyboi
Veteran Member
Posts: 1,332
Threads: 44
Likes Given: 525
Likes Recieved: 1284 in 762 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 15
#43
Sep 7, 2016, 04:31 PM
(Sep 7, 2016, 04:24 PM)Markus Wrote: +Support

On another note: ISIS lost its Turkish borde, essentially isolating it from the outside world. Hurray!

A little off color for this thread but okay.
[Image: FhOfSGo.png]
(This post was last modified: Sep 7, 2016, 04:31 PM by Toxic.)
The following 1 user Likes Toxic's post:
  • Wesley Lawrence
Soviethooves radio_button_checked
American Player
Media Contractor
Posts: 6,710
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 33
#44
Sep 9, 2016, 05:53 AM
Any more opinions?
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
[Image: n0LLhCI.jpg]
Mathias radio_button_checked
Developer
Veteran Member
Posts: 279
Threads: 26
Likes Given: 187
Likes Recieved: 264 in 78 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 7
#45
Sep 11, 2016, 12:03 AM
Approved.
The following 2 users Like Mathias's post:
  • Overlewd, Zeyon




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)