Login
Sign Up


You are using the mobile version of the forum, some features have been disabled to have it responsive.
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight Discord
Ares Defence Services Discord
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight DiscordAres Defence Services Discord

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Development Contributor Workflow

receiptHR Blog:

What *are* they doing over there?

receiptTeacher Blog:

Insight into the Teacher Team

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Infrastructure Upgrade 11/2019

receiptDevelopment Blog:

how suggestions???

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Planning for the future.


This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

The Big Questions - Police Whitelist
Tom* radio_button_checked
Member
Registered User
Posts: 1,328
Threads: 139
Likes Given: 770
Likes Recieved: 889 in 480 posts
Joined: Nov 2016
Reputation: 33
#31
Jun 19, 2020, 05:52 PM
Aswell I know this is sort of Off-Topic but something should be done with the PD to make it function as something more than just a spawn point
The following 1 user Likes Tom*'s post:
  • Duckie
Taylor radio_button_checked
"You are not torturing people in your office"
Contributor
Posts: 3,087
Threads: 176
Likes Given: 2622
Likes Recieved: 1971 in 1214 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 40
#32
Jun 19, 2020, 08:33 PM
So, here's my take on things:

Development
I feel we should take the more serious approach to this, remove all municiple/county/state police groups (ie allow those RPing as federal (or other) agencies, who don't use police jobs to continue operating) and have the police slots be strictly whitelist only.

The "Police Chief" job should be removed, and instead have a system (similar to the clan system) where it's done inside a database or whatever. What I mean by this is, higher ranking individuals in the police department will be able to promote and demote officers to Sergeant, Lieutenant, whatever without the need for 50,000,000 individual jobs.

I also think that by doing this, we'll be able to remove the current liveries and simply have "Southside Police Department" (SSPD) liveries.

Structure
Structure has clearly been a large topic of debate here, and I believe the solution is fairly simple. We should use a barebones paramilitary structure, that the majority of people are already familiar with:
- Officer
- Sergeant
- Lieutenant
- Captain
- Assistant Chief
- Deputy Chief
- Chief of Police

This prevents confusion as everyone has a set rank, and is also incredibly easy for any new players to understand.

Regarding the "Chief of Police", a position which I suspect will cause a lot of heated arguments, especially if people are unhappy with who gets it. I reckon our best bet is to host an election for the role, based on preferential voting - in order to keep as many people happy as possible. As people have mentioned corruption, I'll touch onto it also. Corruption amongst the lower ranks is an issue that can dealt with by an Internal Affairs Bureau, similar to what many of the current police groups have. However when the Chief of Police is corrupt, issues start to arise. One solution may be "make it against the rules for a chief to be corrupt", which is stupid in my opinion as we shouldn't be restricting roleplays. I believe a better idea would be to give an Administrator a sort of "Auditor" role, where they ensure the Chief is perfoming as expected and has the authority to remove them if necessary, however this role will not have any authority over the police force itself.

The next part of the structure would be divisions/bureaus/whatever, which I think should be handled by the leadership of the department and not set in stone by staff/development.
[Image: 800px-PWRR_Tiger.svg.png]
Have I helped you out? Leave a rep!
Judge Rage radio_button_checked
Deny, Defend, Depose
RP Assistant (CityRP)
Posts: 1,048
Threads: 79
Likes Given: 746
Likes Recieved: 1360 in 534 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 12
#33
Jun 27, 2020, 02:12 PM
We shouldn’t have a structure, it should literally be a whitelist to join the job. We shouldn’t be killing RP groups
[Image: e2383c4b9c0b468c036343bcb016445a.gif]

[Image: dae6afafc7acf1d8463545c4bd530ec1.png]
The following 4 users Like Judge Rage's post:
  • Lord Octagon, Maveric, Nudel, Taylor
Maveric radio_button_checked
Member
Membership
Posts: 348
Threads: 34
Likes Given: 212
Likes Recieved: 204 in 102 posts
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation: 6
#34
Jun 27, 2020, 06:51 PM
(Jun 27, 2020, 02:12 PM)Judge Rage Wrote: We shouldn’t have a structure, it should literally be a whitelist to join the job. We shouldn’t be killing RP groups

Having a structure wouldn't necessarily kill rp groups, it could be developed to work along side them. That's just my take on things though
[Image: signiture.png]
Thank you @Ben 
Judge Rage radio_button_checked
Deny, Defend, Depose
RP Assistant (CityRP)
Posts: 1,048
Threads: 79
Likes Given: 746
Likes Recieved: 1360 in 534 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 12
#35
Jun 27, 2020, 09:23 PM
(Jun 27, 2020, 06:51 PM)Maveric Wrote:
(Jun 27, 2020, 02:12 PM)Judge Rage Wrote: We shouldn’t have a structure, it should literally be a whitelist to join the job. We shouldn’t be killing RP groups

Having a structure wouldn't necessarily kill rp groups, it could be developed to work along side them. That's just my take on things though

By taking away all their autonomy and decision making and forcing them to accept random supervisors? Unless you're suggesting that we implement RP groups into the whitelist structure somehow, but it'd go the way of the livery debate, the team would want some generic police force without any geographical association so RP groups like NYPD/Jersey City/MCSO are down the drain
[Image: e2383c4b9c0b468c036343bcb016445a.gif]

[Image: dae6afafc7acf1d8463545c4bd530ec1.png]
The following 2 users Like Judge Rage's post:
  • Lord Octagon, Nudel
Doctor Internet radio_button_checked
Management, Developer, Administrator, Business Adviser, DPO, Security
Core Manager
Posts: 12,549
Threads: 1,763
Likes Given: 420
Likes Recieved: 3471 in 1669 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 35
#36
Jun 30, 2020, 02:21 PM
So an update on this, I've shifted over to some more general questions for the time being, which you can find on https://limelightgaming.net/forums/thread-27889.html. We might come back to this thread, but for the time being, there's more broader issues to tackle, to which a whitelist might not be the best solution.
For Data Protection Queries, please email info@limelightgaming.net.
For Business, Contributor or Development queries, please PM me.
For Appeals, please post in the relevant subforum.
For Security Information, your best bet is to speak to Burnett.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)