Posts: 6,711
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
33
|
Nov 16, 2017, 04:49 PM
Explain your suggestion, in detail: Make bases fit the RP of the player's RP (Ex. A Thug probably lives in a shit hole or a gang lives in a moderately constructed house for basing purposes) and have them realistically built and not super bases. (So add RP aesthetic to show that your base IS where you live, eat, plan, etc.)
Explain why the suggestion should be implemented:
Because of this shit honestly: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/f...1202512029
Yes, I'm salty. And yes, it pushed me to make this. This is a RP server, not Team Deathmatch base Building. This is a base for a 2 man gang. A 2 MAN GANG. Why does it look like Fort Knox?
I understand basing is fun, but that's only like a quarter of the server. If you want to base on a RP server, you need to make it fit your RP. So, put a rule in place (or make it clear this falls under Failrp) so we don't see this shit. You can still make fortifications, but make them fit in like flipped tables, moderately sized concrete walls, fences, furniture as cover, etc. This is a RP server, we shouldn't be seeing these bases just because some guys want to protect contraband. Make them actually RP their situation. Not just build wall and shoot cops.
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
|
|
Nudel
radio_button_checked
nuh uh
Posts: 3,062
Threads: 181
Likes Given: 8790
Likes Recieved: 2112 in 1295 posts
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation:
52
|
Nov 16, 2017, 04:52 PM
Neutral.
I am against more restrictions but I get your point. Will possibly change to +support later.
(This post was last modified: Nov 16, 2017, 07:10 PM by Nudel. Edited 1 time in total.)
|
|
Posts: 6,711
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
33
|
Nov 16, 2017, 04:54 PM
(Nov 16, 2017, 04:52 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: Neutral.
I am against more restrictions but I get your point. Will possibly change to +support later.
What would you say is a good or bad restriction?
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
|
|
Dick
radio_button_checked
Supervising Administrator
Posts: 4,634
Threads: 461
Likes Given: 1823
Likes Recieved: 1910 in 1239 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
25
|
Nov 16, 2017, 05:16 PM
+Support
I perosnally believe that this should be sometng more restricted upon. I wouldn't mind a fence around a property as there are things like this but for the example provided I don't believe I have seen anything that would support this kind of thing. It is very strange to have a large and masive metal barrier around a house.
|
|
Markus
radio_button_checked
Roleplayin' since 2011
Posts: 1,755
Threads: 168
Likes Given: 1967
Likes Recieved: 579 in 384 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
12
|
Nov 16, 2017, 06:53 PM
+Support
With building materials (from walls to pieces of furniture) being 100% free, there needs to be some kind of restriction to what and how you can build in your respective roles.
No more Anarchists having military outposts like they are in friggin Iraq, please.
(This post was last modified: Nov 16, 2017, 06:53 PM by Markus. Edited 1 time in total.)
|
|
Posts: 501
Threads: 22
Likes Given: 525
Likes Recieved: 713 in 397 posts
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation:
10
|
Nov 16, 2017, 06:55 PM
-support
not needed, excessive/horribly designed bases already fall under FailRP (or a specific rule last I checked) and I see nothing wrong with the screenshot of the base you posted.
Stop trying to ruin other people's fun just because you didn't like their base
|
|
Nudel
radio_button_checked
nuh uh
Posts: 3,062
Threads: 181
Likes Given: 8790
Likes Recieved: 2112 in 1295 posts
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation:
52
|
Nov 16, 2017, 07:11 PM
(Nov 16, 2017, 06:55 PM)Tails Wrote: -support
not needed, excessive/horribly designed bases already fall under FailRP (or a specific rule last I checked) and I see nothing wrong with the screenshot of the base you posted.
Stop trying to ruin other people's fun just because you didn't like their base
Changing to -support.
|
|
Posts: 6,711
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
33
|
Nov 16, 2017, 07:26 PM
(Nov 16, 2017, 06:55 PM)Tails Wrote: -support
not needed, excessive/horribly designed bases already fall under FailRP (or a specific rule last I checked) and I see nothing wrong with the screenshot of the base you posted.
Stop trying to ruin other people's fun just because you didn't like their base
If there is a rule of it, please send it to me and I will love to have this concluded.
Why do you think I'm trying to ruin other people's fun? It isn't fun to see a monstrosity like the example above for the only reason being "I have contraband and I'm in a gang." This is a RP server, not Team Deathmatch. Act like you're on a RP server and integrate your defenses into a realistic setting of what you're building.
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
(This post was last modified: Nov 16, 2017, 07:38 PM by Soviethooves. Edited 3 times in total.)
|
|
Posts: 501
Threads: 22
Likes Given: 525
Likes Recieved: 713 in 397 posts
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation:
10
|
Nov 16, 2017, 07:52 PM
(Nov 16, 2017, 07:26 PM)Gungranny Wrote: (Nov 16, 2017, 06:55 PM)Tails Wrote: -support
not needed, excessive/horribly designed bases already fall under FailRP (or a specific rule last I checked) and I see nothing wrong with the screenshot of the base you posted.
Stop trying to ruin other people's fun just because you didn't like their base
If there is a rule of it, please send it to me and I will love to have this concluded.
Why do you think I'm trying to ruin other people's fun? It isn't fun to see a monstrosity like the example above for the only reason being "I have contraband and I'm in a gang." This is a RP server, not Team Deathmatch. Act like you're on a RP server and integrate your defenses into a realistic setting of what you're building.
Cant find the rule on it, but I'm certain there was one stating that unrealistic builds (including materials) were not allowed.
Not everyone has amazing building skills, so don't expect every base you see to demonstrate them. Not allowing a player to RP as he wishes simply because he isn't as talented as other people is unfair, and if you think the base in that screenshot is a "monstrosity" then you're gonna be cutting out a lot of players from basing.
|
|
SourLemon
radio_button_checked
American Person
Posts: 301
Threads: 22
Likes Given: 326
Likes Recieved: 480 in 164 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
1
|
|
Posts: 6,711
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
33
|
Nov 16, 2017, 08:44 PM
(Nov 16, 2017, 07:52 PM)Tails Wrote: (Nov 16, 2017, 07:26 PM)Gungranny Wrote: (Nov 16, 2017, 06:55 PM)Tails Wrote: -support
not needed, excessive/horribly designed bases already fall under FailRP (or a specific rule last I checked) and I see nothing wrong with the screenshot of the base you posted.
Stop trying to ruin other people's fun just because you didn't like their base
If there is a rule of it, please send it to me and I will love to have this concluded.
Why do you think I'm trying to ruin other people's fun? It isn't fun to see a monstrosity like the example above for the only reason being "I have contraband and I'm in a gang." This is a RP server, not Team Deathmatch. Act like you're on a RP server and integrate your defenses into a realistic setting of what you're building.
Cant find the rule on it, but I'm certain there was one stating that unrealistic builds (including materials) were not allowed.
Not everyone has amazing building skills, so don't expect every base you see to demonstrate them. Not allowing a player to RP as he wishes simply because he isn't as talented as other people is unfair, and if you think the base in that screenshot is a "monstrosity" then you're gonna be cutting out a lot of players from basing.
It's more than it just looking good, it's about fitting their RP into what they build. Not good at building? Use the stacker tool to make a fence, spawn some furniture in. Just make the building like you'd expect it to in real life. You don't have to be a good builder to place props down realistically. And yes, that is a monstrosity and most players will need to understand that this is a RP server where builds are usually requested to reflect your RP. Actually, in that case, if the rule already exists, I guess we can hopefully see staff enforcing it soon.
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
|
|
Posts: 501
Threads: 22
Likes Given: 525
Likes Recieved: 713 in 397 posts
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation:
10
|
Nov 16, 2017, 08:48 PM
(Nov 16, 2017, 08:44 PM)Gungranny Wrote: (Nov 16, 2017, 07:52 PM)Tails Wrote: (Nov 16, 2017, 07:26 PM)Gungranny Wrote: (Nov 16, 2017, 06:55 PM)Tails Wrote: -support
not needed, excessive/horribly designed bases already fall under FailRP (or a specific rule last I checked) and I see nothing wrong with the screenshot of the base you posted.
Stop trying to ruin other people's fun just because you didn't like their base
If there is a rule of it, please send it to me and I will love to have this concluded.
Why do you think I'm trying to ruin other people's fun? It isn't fun to see a monstrosity like the example above for the only reason being "I have contraband and I'm in a gang." This is a RP server, not Team Deathmatch. Act like you're on a RP server and integrate your defenses into a realistic setting of what you're building.
Cant find the rule on it, but I'm certain there was one stating that unrealistic builds (including materials) were not allowed.
Not everyone has amazing building skills, so don't expect every base you see to demonstrate them. Not allowing a player to RP as he wishes simply because he isn't as talented as other people is unfair, and if you think the base in that screenshot is a "monstrosity" then you're gonna be cutting out a lot of players from basing.
It's more than it just looking good, it's about fitting their RP into what they build. Not good at building? Use the stacker tool to make a fence, spawn some furniture in. Just make the building like you'd expect it to in real life. You don't have to be a good builder to place props down realistically. And yes, that is a monstrosity and most players will need to understand that this is a RP server where builds are usually requested to reflect your RP. Actually, in that case, if the rule already exists, I guess we can hopefully see staff enforcing it soon.
Even if the rule doesnt exist anymore, surely it would fall under FailRP (like every other thing on the server)
|
|
Posts: 6,711
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
33
|
Nov 16, 2017, 08:55 PM
(Nov 16, 2017, 08:48 PM)Tails Wrote: (Nov 16, 2017, 08:44 PM)Gungranny Wrote: (Nov 16, 2017, 07:52 PM)Tails Wrote: (Nov 16, 2017, 07:26 PM)Gungranny Wrote: (Nov 16, 2017, 06:55 PM)Tails Wrote: -support
not needed, excessive/horribly designed bases already fall under FailRP (or a specific rule last I checked) and I see nothing wrong with the screenshot of the base you posted.
Stop trying to ruin other people's fun just because you didn't like their base
If there is a rule of it, please send it to me and I will love to have this concluded.
Why do you think I'm trying to ruin other people's fun? It isn't fun to see a monstrosity like the example above for the only reason being "I have contraband and I'm in a gang." This is a RP server, not Team Deathmatch. Act like you're on a RP server and integrate your defenses into a realistic setting of what you're building.
Cant find the rule on it, but I'm certain there was one stating that unrealistic builds (including materials) were not allowed.
Not everyone has amazing building skills, so don't expect every base you see to demonstrate them. Not allowing a player to RP as he wishes simply because he isn't as talented as other people is unfair, and if you think the base in that screenshot is a "monstrosity" then you're gonna be cutting out a lot of players from basing.
It's more than it just looking good, it's about fitting their RP into what they build. Not good at building? Use the stacker tool to make a fence, spawn some furniture in. Just make the building like you'd expect it to in real life. You don't have to be a good builder to place props down realistically. And yes, that is a monstrosity and most players will need to understand that this is a RP server where builds are usually requested to reflect your RP. Actually, in that case, if the rule already exists, I guess we can hopefully see staff enforcing it soon.
Even if the rule doesnt exist anymore, surely it would fall under FailRP (like every other thing on the server)
Not everything falls under Failrp, but I assume this would. Staff can't specify everything in the rules, so they need to go off each case.
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
|
|
Posts: 1,920
Threads: 66
Likes Given: 253
Likes Recieved: 813 in 490 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
18
|
Nov 17, 2017, 11:23 AM
-Support , a gang could have a fancy base , he could Rp that he stole it from someone rich , doesnt matter , people are free to do everything they want and thats the way we should stay , not to mention its almost impossible to have a propierty without walls
|
|
Posts: 6,711
Threads: 185
Likes Given: 3303
Likes Recieved: 3986 in 2172 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
33
|
Nov 17, 2017, 06:38 PM
I’m not asking for the style to be completely right, I’m asking for the base to look realistic to the setting. Ex. A residential base would look subtle with a concrete fence, while and industrial base would have larger defenses.
<span id="sceditor-end-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span><span id="sceditor-start-marker" class="sceditor-selection sceditor-ignore" style="line-height: 0; display: none;"> </span>
|
|