Login
Sign Up


You are using the mobile version of the forum, some features have been disabled to have it responsive.
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight Discord
Ares Defence Services Discord
Limelight Reunion 2024 - v4b1Limelight DiscordAres Defence Services Discord

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Development Contributor Workflow

receiptHR Blog:

What *are* they doing over there?

receiptTeacher Blog:

Insight into the Teacher Team

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Infrastructure Upgrade 11/2019

receiptDevelopment Blog:

how suggestions???

receiptDevelopment Blog:

Planning for the future.


This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Closed 
UBLR: Goigle
BlackDog radio_button_checked
Veteran
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,728
Threads: 49
Likes Given: 0
Likes Recieved: 1303 in 662 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 20
#16
Jan 15, 2017, 08:13 PM
(Jan 15, 2017, 07:36 PM)goigle Wrote: Also, at the time, technically we're a 3rd unemployed contractor.

A 3rd party contractor RPing as the FBI,a government agency, this still does not explain nor justify you opening fire on police for serving a search warrant on you.

Had you been RPing a gang, or a privately owned company this is one thing, but your own clan page lists you as a fully law abideing government angecy. 

Government contract or not, when doing your clans RP you are still bound by the restrictions you have set upon yourself during its creation.
[Image: 48d63884162a5acbea739f54e3909f3c.jpg]
SirWulf radio_button_checked
Former Fire and Rescue
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,033
Threads: 31
Likes Given: 628
Likes Recieved: 1179 in 537 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 21
#17
Jan 15, 2017, 09:21 PM
I think this has blown way out of proportion here. This is about a Blacklist. I believe that this Blacklist is valid as an 'FBI Agent' would never fire upon a government employee unless defending himself. As the FBI was the one firing the first shot.... then this is valid.

Everything else doesn't really matter. And this is going on way to long with this back and forth. It is clear that none of you are going to agree on the exact scenario, which ultimately doesn't matter for the case.

I believe that this should be denied.
BlackDog radio_button_checked
Veteran
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,728
Threads: 49
Likes Given: 0
Likes Recieved: 1303 in 662 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 20
#18
Jan 15, 2017, 09:45 PM
Any final words before this is concluded?
[Image: 48d63884162a5acbea739f54e3909f3c.jpg]
goigle radio_button_checked
american!!!!
Developer
Posts: 978
Threads: 96
Likes Given: 535
Likes Recieved: 584 in 261 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 17
#19
Jan 15, 2017, 10:03 PM
(Jan 15, 2017, 08:13 PM)BlackDog Wrote:
(Jan 15, 2017, 07:36 PM)goigle Wrote: Also, at the time, technically we're a 3rd unemployed contractor.

A 3rd party contractor RPing as the FBI,a government agency, this still does not explain nor justify you opening fire on police for serving a search warrant on you.

Had you been RPing a gang, or a privately owned company this is one thing, but your own clan page lists you as a fully law abideing government angecy. 

Government contract or not, when doing your clans RP you are still bound by the restrictions you have set upon yourself during its creation.

Look, this is a circular argument with you.
You mention law abiding multiple times, and I have told you multiple times that under US federal law it would not have been unlawful for us to shoot them.

If you fell for it, you're legally obligated to give me a +rep.         [Image: s7Y0Ioo.png]
goigle radio_button_checked
american!!!!
Developer
Posts: 978
Threads: 96
Likes Given: 535
Likes Recieved: 584 in 261 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 17
#20
Jan 15, 2017, 10:04 PM
(Jan 15, 2017, 09:21 PM)SirWulf Wrote: I think this has blown way out of proportion here.  This is about a Blacklist.  I believe that this Blacklist is valid as an 'FBI Agent' would never fire upon a government employee unless defending himself.  As the FBI was the one firing the first shot.... then this is valid.

Everything else doesn't really matter.  And this is going on way to long with this back and forth.  It is clear that none of you are going to agree on the exact scenario, which ultimately doesn't matter for the case.

I believe that this should be denied.

Thank you, all I really wanted was another person's eyes on this

I do have one question though:

Why was this allowed before (late 2015, early 2016)?
I have done it under admin supervision before, I think they may have resigned but I don't remember who the two were specifically.

If you fell for it, you're legally obligated to give me a +rep.         [Image: s7Y0Ioo.png]
(This post was last modified: Jan 15, 2017, 10:05 PM by goigle.)
BlackDog radio_button_checked
Veteran
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,728
Threads: 49
Likes Given: 0
Likes Recieved: 1303 in 662 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 20
#21
Jan 15, 2017, 10:06 PM
Unblacklist Request Denied
[Image: 48d63884162a5acbea739f54e3909f3c.jpg]
SirWulf radio_button_checked
Former Fire and Rescue
Veteran Member
Posts: 2,033
Threads: 31
Likes Given: 628
Likes Recieved: 1179 in 537 posts
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 21
#22
Jan 15, 2017, 10:34 PM
(Jan 15, 2017, 10:04 PM)goigle Wrote:
(Jan 15, 2017, 09:21 PM)SirWulf Wrote: I think this has blown way out of proportion here.  This is about a Blacklist.  I believe that this Blacklist is valid as an 'FBI Agent' would never fire upon a government employee unless defending himself.  As the FBI was the one firing the first shot.... then this is valid.

Everything else doesn't really matter.  And this is going on way to long with this back and forth.  It is clear that none of you are going to agree on the exact scenario, which ultimately doesn't matter for the case.

I believe that this should be denied.

Thank you, all I really wanted was another person's eyes on this

I do have one question though:

Why was this allowed before (late 2015, early 2016)?
I have done it under admin supervision before, I think they may have resigned but I don't remember who the two were specifically.

I'm going to answer this best I can.  Now, I wasn't present for any of this, so cannot talk for any situation. 

However, there are times when law enforcement is revealed as corrupt and can be placed under arrest, or if they open fire first, can then be taken down for self-defense.  Here in the states, I remember a Sheriff being prosecuted for selling drugs in the High School from the trunk of his squad car.  It does happen.

However, killing should be the last resort.  Now if you have questions please let us know.  I'd be happy to help.
Closed 




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)