+Support
It will help officers and give us more realism, and maybee add a option to mute the radio or turn down the volume?
ASwell as if officers abuses their radio the Police Sergeant can demote them if needed.
(Sep 4, 2015, 12:17 PM)Nacreas Wrote: [ -> ]It would be near impossible to moderate because staff aren't going to be able to constantly listen to the voice-chat.
You could just use our TeamSpeak 3 server we provide:
![[Image: ChMoffJ.png]](https://i.imgur.com/ChMoffJ.png)
-Support.
If that's the argument to why we can't have an IG, then how are we supposed to monitor the TS?
Yes it may be hard to control, yet we never complain about how hard it is to control TS or IG voice chat.
(Oct 14, 2016, 06:42 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: [ -> ] (Sep 4, 2015, 12:17 PM)Nacreas Wrote: [ -> ]It would be near impossible to moderate because staff aren't going to be able to constantly listen to the voice-chat.
You could just use our TeamSpeak 3 server we provide:
-Support.
If that's the argument to why we can't have an IG, then how are we supposed to monitor the TS?
Yes it may be hard to control, yet we never complain about how hard it is to control TS or IG voice chat.
More often than not you're more likely to find a staff member on TeamSpeak than in-game; I'm an example of this because of my timezone. Should someone report a rule violation, I can simply jump channels as opposed to having to join the servers which allows for a quicker response.
In any case, if we have this current TeamSpeak system, which works perfectly fine, I don't see why we need another system.
(Oct 15, 2016, 04:27 AM)Nacreas Wrote: [ -> ] (Oct 14, 2016, 06:42 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: [ -> ] (Sep 4, 2015, 12:17 PM)Nacreas Wrote: [ -> ]It would be near impossible to moderate because staff aren't going to be able to constantly listen to the voice-chat.
You could just use our TeamSpeak 3 server we provide:
-Support.
If that's the argument to why we can't have an IG, then how are we supposed to monitor the TS?
Yes it may be hard to control, yet we never complain about how hard it is to control TS or IG voice chat.
More often than not you're more likely to find a staff member on TeamSpeak than in-game; I'm an example of this because of my timezone. Should someone report a rule violation, I can simply jump channels as opposed to having to join the servers which allows for a quicker response.
In any case, if we have this current TeamSpeak system, which works perfectly fine, I don't see why we need another system.
Well some people may not using TS,not only for me as i'm a foreign i shouldn't be a example.Just make a newcomer as a example.A Radio In Game would letting them to communicate without using TS and makes things easier and people may hear the officer speak in radio or the radio says which would letting Corleone And Anarchist could listen to the Police Radio simply by standing next to a police officer.
(Oct 15, 2016, 04:27 AM)Nacreas Wrote: [ -> ] (Oct 14, 2016, 06:42 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: [ -> ] (Sep 4, 2015, 12:17 PM)Nacreas Wrote: [ -> ]It would be near impossible to moderate because staff aren't going to be able to constantly listen to the voice-chat.
You could just use our TeamSpeak 3 server we provide:
-Support.
If that's the argument to why we can't have an IG, then how are we supposed to monitor the TS?
Yes it may be hard to control, yet we never complain about how hard it is to control TS or IG voice chat.
More often than not you're more likely to find a staff member on TeamSpeak than in-game; I'm an example of this because of my timezone. Should someone report a rule violation, I can simply jump channels as opposed to having to join the servers which allows for a quicker response.
In any case, if we have this current TeamSpeak system, which works perfectly fine, I don't see why we need another system.
Yea, it works perfectly fine, but I want to say 50% of the players use it. At times, TS and IG voice chat can get hectic and annoying. Some players may even be inclined to not use TS because why should they rely on a different piece of software for faster communication?
If we just basically cut out the middle man of having our only VOIP Radio option being in TS, then we would see a rise in communication and more likely than not, more effective teamwork skills which everyone benefits from. Think about it. Let's say the whole government overhears a player say in VOIP "Fuck you Soviet. You fucking piece of shit!" and he continues. That's at least 4 people hearing that and leading to most likely a PR.
Not to mention the fact that it wouldn't be any harder than how it is to monitor for rule breakers in TS. Sure, jump to a guy's channel in TS to fix the situation, but I can do the same if I'm on the server and I get a PM. Most players just use TS for a chat room to talk to friends and less on just being focused in LL Servers.
The only cons I can think of are the same as the TS Server:
Mic Spamming Minges
+Support, Government RolePlay will be enhanced massively
(Oct 15, 2016, 06:16 AM)alan245 Wrote: [ -> ] (Oct 15, 2016, 04:27 AM)Nacreas Wrote: [ -> ] (Oct 14, 2016, 06:42 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: [ -> ] (Sep 4, 2015, 12:17 PM)Nacreas Wrote: [ -> ]It would be near impossible to moderate because staff aren't going to be able to constantly listen to the voice-chat.
You could just use our TeamSpeak 3 server we provide:
-Support.
If that's the argument to why we can't have an IG, then how are we supposed to monitor the TS?
Yes it may be hard to control, yet we never complain about how hard it is to control TS or IG voice chat.
More often than not you're more likely to find a staff member on TeamSpeak than in-game; I'm an example of this because of my timezone. Should someone report a rule violation, I can simply jump channels as opposed to having to join the servers which allows for a quicker response.
In any case, if we have this current TeamSpeak system, which works perfectly fine, I don't see why we need another system.
Well some people may not using TS,not only for me as i'm a foreign i shouldn't be a example.Just make a newcomer as a example.A Radio In Game would letting them to communicate without using TS and makes things easier and people may hear the officer speak in radio or the radio says which would letting Corleone And Anarchist could listen to the Police Radio simply by standing next to a police officer.
TeamSpeak 3 is a service we offer and fully supports the desired system already and it should be incorporated with our other services, just as it is now. Having this system on TeamSpeak allows us to encourage players to join our TS3 server, meet new people while utilising our 128 slot server.
(Oct 15, 2016, 10:02 AM)Soviethooves Wrote: [ -> ] (Oct 15, 2016, 04:27 AM)Nacreas Wrote: [ -> ] (Oct 14, 2016, 06:42 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: [ -> ] (Sep 4, 2015, 12:17 PM)Nacreas Wrote: [ -> ]It would be near impossible to moderate because staff aren't going to be able to constantly listen to the voice-chat.
You could just use our TeamSpeak 3 server we provide:
-Support.
If that's the argument to why we can't have an IG, then how are we supposed to monitor the TS?
Yes it may be hard to control, yet we never complain about how hard it is to control TS or IG voice chat.
More often than not you're more likely to find a staff member on TeamSpeak than in-game; I'm an example of this because of my timezone. Should someone report a rule violation, I can simply jump channels as opposed to having to join the servers which allows for a quicker response.
In any case, if we have this current TeamSpeak system, which works perfectly fine, I don't see why we need another system.
Yea, it works perfectly fine, but I want to say 50% of the players use it. At times, TS and IG voice chat can get hectic and annoying.
Some players may even be inclined to not use TS because why should they rely on a different piece of software for faster communication?
If we just basically cut out the middle man of having our only VOIP Radio option being in TS, then we would see a rise in communication and more likely than not, more effective teamwork skills which everyone benefits from. Think about it. Let's say the whole government overhears a player say in VOIP "Fuck you Soviet. You fucking piece of shit!" and he continues. That's at least 4 people hearing that and leading to most likely a PR.
Not to mention the fact that it wouldn't be any harder than how it is to monitor for rule breakers in TS. Sure, jump to a guy's channel in TS to fix the situation, but I can do the same if I'm on the server and I get a PM. Most players just use TS for a chat room to talk to friends and less on just being focused in LL Servers.
The only cons I can think of are the same as the TS Server:
Mic Spamming Minges
Quote:Yea, it works perfectly fine, but I want to say 50% of the players use it. At times, TS and IG voice chat can get hectic and annoying.
Having the in-game radio in the background would be just as annoying as having TeamSpeak; it works both ways.
Quote:Some players may even be inclined to not use TS because why should they rely on a different piece of software for faster communication?
Encouraging players to utilise our 128 slot TS3 server would create a better community atmosphere because players would be able to form groups and meet new people, just as I and many others have done in the past.
Quote:If we just basically cut out the middle man of having our only VOIP Radio option being in TS, then we would see a rise in communication and more likely than not, more effective teamwork skills which everyone benefits from.
Possibly, but this is still fully achievable with our current system. Both you and I have participated in government radio channels where the coordination was perfect and resulted in players being rewarded with REP's.
Quote:Think about it. Let's say the whole government overhears a player say in VOIP "Fuck you Soviet. You fucking piece of shit!" and he continues. That's at least 4 people hearing that and leading to most likely a PR.
Any person in TeamSpeak can just as easily report a player.
Quote:Not to mention the fact that it wouldn't be any harder than how it is to monitor for rule breakers in TS. Sure, jump to a guy's channel in TS to fix the situation, but I can do the same if I'm on the server and I get a PM. Most players just use TS for a chat room to talk to friends and less on just being focused in LL Servers.
Players would get a faster response from staff because the connection time and channel-switch time is much lower compared to joining the CityRP 2 servers. I would like to reiterate the point that there is almost always a member of staff on TeamSpeak, but this can't always be said for the RP servers only because there are times where there just isn't enough players to supervise; my timezone is an example. I can personally be found idling on the TS3 server and if I notice a player in the support channel or if I'm contacted through PM, I respond when possible.
I still believe TeamSpeak suffices.
(Sep 16, 2015, 10:08 PM)Rocket Wrote: [ -> ]As much as I would love to have this on the the server but the big issue I see from it is how it is going to be used to break the rules allot most of which are the following.
NLR
A lower houred police officer goes to a raid unaware of the NLR rules, then he dies and as soon as he respawns he calles for backup at the place where he last died. I understand that it is our jobs as staff to stop those but it is really hard to prove things when players are speaking down the microphone.
People might have really bad and annoying microphones or just having some good old call of duty 360noscoping squeakers, either way it could get really loud.
To the NLR:
Because the cop cant just write it in the radio after he died ?
This argument is just ???
(Oct 16, 2016, 10:19 AM)Nebula Wrote: [ -> ] (Sep 16, 2015, 10:08 PM)Rocket Wrote: [ -> ]As much as I would love to have this on the the server but the big issue I see from it is how it is going to be used to break the rules allot most of which are the following.
NLR
A lower houred police officer goes to a raid unaware of the NLR rules, then he dies and as soon as he respawns he calles for backup at the place where he last died. I understand that it is our jobs as staff to stop those but it is really hard to prove things when players are speaking down the microphone.
People might have really bad and annoying microphones or just having some good old call of duty 360noscoping squeakers, either way it could get really loud.
To the NLR:
Because the cop cant just write it in the radio after he died ?
This argument is just ???
It is much easier to prove an NLR violation if it happens in chat than if it happens via microphone.
+support And about the loud noises maybe add like a talk power limit
![[+]](/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
Spoiler