Explain your suggestion, in detail: move binoculars and handcuffs to misc
Explain why the suggestion should be implemented: because it makes sense for them to be in the misc section and i dont think handcuffs or a pair of binoculars is going to harm you. its also limiting people with weapons blacklists rp
+Support for Binoculars, but i think the handcuff's should remain under Weapons.
(Apr 6, 2019, 01:16 PM)Zaidplays Wrote: [ -> ]+Support for Binoculars, but i think the handcuff's should remain under Weapons.
(Apr 6, 2019, 01:16 PM)Zaidplays Wrote: [ -> ]+Support for Binoculars, but i think the handcuff's should remain under Weapons.
why should they remain under weapons? hostage rope comes under black market and you can use that just fine. i dont think u can slap someone with handcuffs hm
(Apr 6, 2019, 07:28 PM)pufitee Wrote: [ -> ] (Apr 6, 2019, 01:16 PM)Zaidplays Wrote: [ -> ]+Support for Binoculars, but i think the handcuff's should remain under Weapons.
why should they remain under weapons? hostage rope comes under black market and you can use that just fine. i dont think u can slap someone with handcuffs hm
+Support to add rope to weapon blacklists
If you can’t be trusted with weapons, I wouldn’t trust you with detaining someone.
(Apr 6, 2019, 07:51 PM)Gungranny Wrote: [ -> ] (Apr 6, 2019, 07:28 PM)pufitee Wrote: [ -> ] (Apr 6, 2019, 01:16 PM)Zaidplays Wrote: [ -> ]+Support for Binoculars, but i think the handcuff's should remain under Weapons.
why should they remain under weapons? hostage rope comes under black market and you can use that just fine. i dont think u can slap someone with handcuffs hm
+Support to add rope to weapon blacklists
If you can’t be trusted with weapons, I wouldn’t trust you with detaining someone.
right excuse me what
(Apr 6, 2019, 07:51 PM)Gungranny Wrote: [ -> ] (Apr 6, 2019, 07:28 PM)pufitee Wrote: [ -> ] (Apr 6, 2019, 01:16 PM)Zaidplays Wrote: [ -> ]+Support for Binoculars, but i think the handcuff's should remain under Weapons.
why should they remain under weapons? hostage rope comes under black market and you can use that just fine. i dont think u can slap someone with handcuffs hm
+Support to add rope to weapon blacklists
If you can’t be trusted with weapons, I wouldn’t trust you with detaining someone.
(Apr 6, 2019, 07:51 PM)Gungranny Wrote: [ -> ] (Apr 6, 2019, 07:28 PM)pufitee Wrote: [ -> ] (Apr 6, 2019, 01:16 PM)Zaidplays Wrote: [ -> ]+Support for Binoculars, but i think the handcuff's should remain under Weapons.
why should they remain under weapons? hostage rope comes under black market and you can use that just fine. i dont think u can slap someone with handcuffs hm
+Support to add rope to weapon blacklists
If you can’t be trusted with weapons, I wouldn’t trust you with detaining someone.
Yeah and if you can't be trusted with weapons, I wouldn't trust you with driving a vehicle, nor being on the server. +Support to perming anyone with a weapons blacklist.
That's what your argument sounds like. +Support for moving both items to misc.
Weapons are supposed to be used (Not their function) as a deterrent, a means of self defense, or a means to control someone. Detaining someone is mostly used for one’s safety during a situation and to control someone.
Vehicles have uses outside of Aggressive RP
Being on the server doesn’t automatically mean you have to do Aggressive RP.
Feel your argument is a little stretched.
(Apr 7, 2019, 06:41 PM)Lord Octagon Wrote: [ -> ] (Apr 6, 2019, 07:51 PM)Gungranny Wrote: [ -> ] (Apr 6, 2019, 07:28 PM)pufitee Wrote: [ -> ]why should they remain under weapons? hostage rope comes under black market and you can use that just fine. i dont think u can slap someone with handcuffs hm
+Support to add rope to weapon blacklists
If you can’t be trusted with weapons, I wouldn’t trust you with detaining someone.
Yeah and if you can't be trusted with weapons, I wouldn't trust you with driving a vehicle, nor being on the server. +Support to perming anyone with a weapons blacklist.
That's what your argument sounds like. +Support for moving both items to misc.
Pushing for Staff Review.
#type:[review]