Limelight Forums

lol at this thread.

"this is not the right answer"

you realize obama had bombed Syria too right? he has also bombed Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, Libya, and Pakistan in 2016 alone.

(Apr 13, 2017, 09:56 PM)jarz Wrote: [ -> ]lol at this thread.

"this is not the right answer"

you realize obama had bombed Syria too right? he has also bombed Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, Libya, and Pakistan in 2016 alone.

Still doesn't justify the airstrikes, there should have been more effort in determining who used/possessed the chemical weapons before any type of retaliatory action was taken. 

I'll refer you back to this video, it contains all the sources you need to come to the conclusion that Assad did not use chemical weapons. 

Lmao, the Syria people arnt wearing gloves? Its fucking Syria, it would be less of a stretch to assume that they just don't have fucking gloves, then to assume that the US govt faked a chemical attack to bomb Syria.

(Apr 13, 2017, 11:23 PM)SourLemon Wrote: [ -> ]Lmao, the Syria people arnt wearing gloves? Its fucking Syria, it would be less of a stretch to assume that they just don't have fucking gloves, then to assume that the US govt faked a chemical attack to bomb Syria.

Syria may no longer be a wealthy country (blame the West for starting a civil war), but its people are. They have extended families with large inheritances. Also, I said "Al-Qaeda", the group that's funded by Western nations. Gloves are not expensive. Anyway, they came in contact with "sarin" but where are they recorded to have died or been hospitalised?

No need for that here, keep it civil. Warned.
-Overlewd

(Apr 14, 2017, 10:58 AM)Lord Octagon Wrote: [ -> ]

(Apr 13, 2017, 11:23 PM)SourLemon Wrote: [ -> ]Lmao, the Syria people arnt wearing gloves? Its fucking Syria, it would be less of a stretch to assume that they just don't have fucking gloves, then to assume that the US govt faked a chemical attack to bomb Syria.

Syria may no longer be a wealthy country (blame the West for starting a civil war), but its people are. They have extended families with large inheritances. Also, I said "Al-Qaeda", the group that's funded by Western nations. Gloves are not expensive. Anyway, they came in contact with "sarin" but where are they recorded to have died or been hospitalised?

There have been reports that some workers were hospitalized due to it.

"Rescue workers from the White Helmets civil defense organization said that many children were among the dead and wounded. Radi Saad, who writes incident reports for the group, said that volunteers had reached the site not knowing a chemical was present and that five of them had suffered from exposure to the substance."

Limelight - Link watcher

You're about to enter the following site: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/world/middleeast/syria-gas-attack.html?_r=1 Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/world....html?_r=1

You have to remember a lot of people there don't exactly have access to the news or what's going on as well. Plus if I recall correctly I saw somewhere that one of them claimed that they did not think of the chemical exposure at the time, and were instead more focused on saving the children upon the ground.

(Apr 14, 2017, 11:37 PM)Preditor Wrote: [ -> ]

(Apr 14, 2017, 10:58 AM)Lord Octagon Wrote: [ -> ]

(Apr 13, 2017, 11:23 PM)SourLemon Wrote: [ -> ]Lmao, the Syria people arnt wearing gloves? Its fucking Syria, it would be less of a stretch to assume that they just don't have fucking gloves, then to assume that the US govt faked a chemical attack to bomb Syria.

Syria may no longer be a wealthy country (blame the West for starting a civil war), but its people are. They have extended families with large inheritances. Also, I said "Al-Qaeda", the group that's funded by Western nations. Gloves are not expensive. Anyway, they came in contact with "sarin" but where are they recorded to have died or been hospitalised?

There have been reports that some workers were hospitalized due to it.

"Rescue workers from the White Helmets civil defense organization said that many children were among the dead and wounded. Radi Saad, who writes incident reports for the group, said that volunteers had reached the site not knowing a chemical was present and that five of them had suffered from exposure to the substance."

Limelight - Link watcher

You're about to enter the following site: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/world/middleeast/syria-gas-attack.html?_r=1 Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/world....html?_r=1

You have to remember a lot of people there don't exactly have access to the news or what's going on as well. Plus if I recall correctly I saw somewhere that one of them claimed that they did not think of the chemical exposure at the time, and were instead more focused on saving the children upon the ground.

Within seconds of exposure to sarin, the affects of the gas begins to target the muscle and nervous system. There is an almost immediate release of the bowels and the bladder, and vomiting is induced. When sarin is used in a concentrated area, it has the likelihood of killing thousands of people.

Still doesn't explain how an anti-Assad TV correspondent, and Mohammad Alloush knew about the attack before its occurrence. If Assad was supposedly going to use it the way the MSM portrays, there was no logical sense to warn his enemies.

And how did this "doctor" in a hospital full of sarin gas victims have the time to tweet and make video calls?

(Apr 15, 2017, 12:39 AM)Lord Octagon Wrote: [ -> ]

(Apr 14, 2017, 11:37 PM)Preditor Wrote: [ -> ]

(Apr 14, 2017, 10:58 AM)Lord Octagon Wrote: [ -> ]

(Apr 13, 2017, 11:23 PM)SourLemon Wrote: [ -> ]Lmao, the Syria people arnt wearing gloves? Its fucking Syria, it would be less of a stretch to assume that they just don't have fucking gloves, then to assume that the US govt faked a chemical attack to bomb Syria.

Syria may no longer be a wealthy country (blame the West for starting a civil war), but its people are. They have extended families with large inheritances. Also, I said "Al-Qaeda", the group that's funded by Western nations. Gloves are not expensive. Anyway, they came in contact with "sarin" but where are they recorded to have died or been hospitalised?

There have been reports that some workers were hospitalized due to it.

"Rescue workers from the White Helmets civil defense organization said that many children were among the dead and wounded. Radi Saad, who writes incident reports for the group, said that volunteers had reached the site not knowing a chemical was present and that five of them had suffered from exposure to the substance."

Limelight - Link watcher

You're about to enter the following site: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/world/middleeast/syria-gas-attack.html?_r=1 Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/world....html?_r=1

You have to remember a lot of people there don't exactly have access to the news or what's going on as well. Plus if I recall correctly I saw somewhere that one of them claimed that they did not think of the chemical exposure at the time, and were instead more focused on saving the children upon the ground.

Within seconds of exposure to sarin, the affects of the gas begins to target the muscle and nervous system. There is an almost immediate release of the bowels and the bladder, and vomiting is induced. When sarin is used in a concentrated area, it has the likelihood of killing thousands of people.

Still doesn't explain how an anti-Assad TV correspondent, and Mohammad Alloush knew about the attack before its occurrence. If Assad was supposedly going to use it the way the MSM portrays, there was no logical sense to warn his enemies.

And how did this "doctor" in a hospital full of sarin gas victims have the time to tweet and make video calls?

Well, for starters your effects are only applied if they are exposed to lethal doses of Sarin gas, which just like all chemicals there are different levels of exposure you can consume.

https://emergency.cdc.gov/agent/sarin/basics/facts.asp

You can look at that if you want the full details, now onto your next point.

As for the reporter I am unsure. Though when it comes to releasing the information I will point you to my previous point on psychological warfare, maybe they released it so that they can stir panic against the enemy? Or maybe they stated it so that perhaps certain people could escape. Or maybe it's all a coincidence with another attack. Though remember, we also warned russia of our attack on the airfield some time before it happened as well, so the same thing applies there does it not? My point if anything proves that there is logical sense behind it, you just have to put yourself in the eyes of said individual.

In today's time, social media plays a huge role in information gathering and educating those with access to the internet. How does he have time? Simple. He stopped to send the message out.