Limelight Forums

I can't wait until all these rioters, people who want a 3rd bathroom, and libtards get a taste of the real world and get drafted
gonna be lit

(Apr 8, 2017, 01:04 AM)SourLemon Wrote: [ -> ]
(Apr 7, 2017, 07:24 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ]I actually hope that syria and russia strike back.

Why dont you fucking move to Syria and fucking join the rest of them since you seem to be on their side.

You pretty like the word "fucking"huh? I dont think your dad would like to see you beeing so evil Rolleyes

(Apr 7, 2017, 07:24 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ]I actually hope that syria and russia strike back. It not even 100% proved that the syrian army is responsible for that. There we 2 different kinds of chemical gases. 1 Bomb. 1 Jet. Tell me how one bomb can have 2 chemical substances which couldnt be used together ín one bomb. As heard from local citizen the place is known for a chemical storage of the rebels.

So you do want a world war then? If Russia or Syria even as so much to TOUCH us with any military force, NATO will be activated and they will attack.

Spoiler

By the NATO agreement, if one member state is attacked, all other members will rush to their aid.

Also, may I point out that chemical weapons are banned via the Geneva conventions on certain conventional weapons. Syria directly violated this international law.

(Apr 8, 2017, 11:17 AM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ]
(Apr 8, 2017, 01:04 AM)SourLemon Wrote: [ -> ]
(Apr 7, 2017, 07:24 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ]I actually hope that syria and russia strike back.

Why dont you fucking move to Syria and fucking join the rest of them since you seem to be on their side.

You pretty like the word "fucking"huh? I dont think your dad would like to see you beeing so evil

Keep it on topic or take your flaming elsewhere.

As for your statement you must be high or something, you just said you want World War Three.

, I'm assuming the "line in the sand" pun was unintended? Y'know, Middle east... desert?

(Apr 8, 2017, 02:18 PM)General Rickets Wrote: [ -> ]
(Apr 8, 2017, 11:17 AM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ]
(Apr 8, 2017, 01:04 AM)SourLemon Wrote: [ -> ]
(Apr 7, 2017, 07:24 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ]I actually hope that syria and russia strike back.

Why dont you fucking move to Syria and fucking join the rest of them since you seem to be on their side.

You pretty like the word "fucking"huh? I dont think your dad would like to see you beeing so evil

Keep it on topic or take your flaming elsewhere.

As for your statement you must be high or something, you just said you want World War Three.

lol

Honestly, I would have agreed with the airstrikes if they actually waited until they had proof that it was the Assad regime that was behind the attack. Launching 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at bases that MAY have been used to launch an attack by a government that MAY have been responsible in a sovereign country is crazy.

(Apr 8, 2017, 07:06 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ]Honestly, I would have agreed with the airstrikes if they actually waited until they had proof that it was the Assad regime that was behind the attack. Launching 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at bases that MAY have been used to launch an attack by a government that MAY have been responsible in a sovereign country is crazy.

"Hurr durr durr I'm assad and peace talks with the West might ensue in the coming months. Oh I know! I'll attack a bunch of my own civillians with chemical weapons attack, that'll get the entire world up my ass!"
The motives don't make sense at all.

Meanwhile in the Assad regime war room...
[Image: 70c22809df492eb5b689f922fdf16eb3.png]

[Image: 70c22809df492eb5b689f922fdf16eb3.png]

(Apr 8, 2017, 11:31 PM)Dig Wrote: [ -> ]"Hurr durr durr I'm assad and peace talks with the West might ensue in the coming months. Oh I know! I'll attack a bunch of my own civillians with chemical weapons attack, that'll get the entire world up my ass!"
The motives don't make sense at all.

Meanwhile in the Assad regime war room...

He's been doing it for some time now, probably long before the peace talks. More importantly he probably underestimated Trump's response to the action. Unlike him Obama never physically attacked Syria due to his multiple previous chemical attacks. To top that Russia is already aiding him so he probably disregarded most of the West's opinion.

As for why would he? Simple, to demoralize the enemy. Note it was a rebel village, and this as a rebel paints a picture of "Would I want to fight a guy who's willing to cross any line to beat me?" type of ideology. Though as you can already see the plan failed miserably.

It's not nice but war isn't supposed to be nice. Even if the citizens were loyal to him remember that he's still a dictator.

If Assad has used chemical weapon(s) in the past, which is the case, why would this time be any different? Why would you negate the fact that he HAS violated international law in the past and come to the conclusion that he wouldn't likely make use of chemical weapons again simply because it doesn't make sense. To say he wouldn't kill his own civilians is very uninformed since he has been doing just that for the past years.

You're also foolish to think that the United States would launch a strategic military attack on a sovereign nation, which is currently backed by Iran and Russia, without absolute certainty in the evidence provided by US intelligence. Trump didn't coordinate this attack, this was simply something that he gave the go-ahead on based on the evidence they had. If you didn't know, nearly all of our allies including Australia, United Kingdom, France, and Israel had issued their strong support of this action. The Tomahawk missiles were a clear and concise message to the Syrian government that any further violation of international law would provoke action by the United States. This is also a message that can be seen from North Korea that any intimidation or violation will lead to a military response.

Obama made it clear that he wouldn't take action to intimidation, however the time has changed for the United States to put some power behind it's punches.

(Apr 9, 2017, 05:55 AM)Nevy Wrote: [ -> ]If Assad has used chemical weapon(s) in the past, which is the case, why would this time be any different? Why would you negate the fact that he HAS violated international law in the past and come to the conclusion that he wouldn't likely make use of chemical weapons again simply because it doesn't make sense. To say he wouldn't kill his own civilians is very uninformed since he has been doing just that for the past years.

You're also foolish to think that the United States would launch a strategic military attack on a sovereign nation, which is currently backed by Iran and Russia, without absolute certainty in the evidence provided by US intelligence. Trump didn't coordinate this attack, this was simply something that he gave the go-ahead on based on the evidence they had. If you didn't know, nearly all of our allies including Australia, United Kingdom, France, and Israel had issued their strong support of this action. The Tomahawk missiles were a clear and concise message to the Syrian government that any further violation of international law would provoke action by the United States. This is also a message that can be seen from North Korea that any intimidation or violation will lead to a military response.

Obama made it clear that he wouldn't take action to intimidation, however the time has changed for the United States to put some power behind it's punches.

Foolish to not follow with the flock? I think it's more foolish not to ask questions. We have a former congressman saying that it was most likely a false flag, a former UN ambassador claiming that Hillary Clinton and a few other politicians actually supplied the rebels with sarin gas awhile before the last attack happened in 2013, and well respected pulitzer prize winner Seymour Hersh also stating that during the last attack then President Obama left out many details to the public.

Quote:“If any of this was true, I don’t know why they couldn’t wait and take a look at it. In 2013, there were similar stories that didn’t go anywhere, because with a little bit of a pause, there was a resistance to it built in our Congress and in the American people. They thought that it was a fraud and nothing like that was happening, and right now, I just can’t think of how it could conceivably be what they claim, because it’s helping ISIS, because it’s helping Al-Qaeda.” -U.S Congressman Ron Paul

You wanna know who else is currently in a war with Syria? ISIS. So either this means a total US occupation of the entire Middle East to also push through remaining ISIS territory all the way to the border of Iran, which I'm sure the Iranians and Russians will not be happy about. I'm not saying I'm against getting rid of ISIS, I'm just saying this war is not just going to encompass Syria.

Tons of anomalies and questionable factors are not being weighed into the main stream approach and it's not because they aren't aware of it, it's because they might not want people to fully grasp what has been going on in the Middle East in recent years. Maybe US Intelligence doesn't want you in on it?

If you watch this following video, the situation is very similar to the one we're going through now.

https://youtu.be/4gXwhsVA6ZI

Quote:"Barack Obama did not tell the whole story this autumn when he tried to make the case that Bashar al-Assad was responsible for the chemical weapons attack near Damascus on 21 August. In some instances, he omitted important intelligence, and in others he presented assumptions as facts. Most significant, he failed to acknowledge something known to the US intelligence community: that the Syrian army is not the only party in the country’s civil war with access to sarin, the nerve agent that a UN study concluded – without assessing responsibility – had been used in the rocket attack. In the months before the attack, the American intelligence agencies produced a series of highly classified reports, culminating in a formal Operations Order – a planning document that precedes a ground invasion – citing evidence that the al-Nusra Front, a jihadi group affiliated with al-Qaida, had mastered the mechanics of creating sarin and was capable of manufacturing it in quantity. When the attack occurred al-Nusra should have been a suspect, but the administration cherry-picked intelligence to justify a strike against Assad." -Seymour M. Hersh

https://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n24/seymour-m-...hose-sarin

This is the same guy who reported on the coverup of military massacres during the Vietnam War, is it really that outlandish to speculate on this sort of issue? Fast forward to the modern day, we see the same exact event occur yet again and immediately the drums of war start pounding as if it were the fucking Balkans in 1914. Jesus how the fuck do we speculate at all if every time someone does they get called an idiot for not following the crowd that supports the story presented by the media. And funny how if you don't follow the headlines plastered on the American news networks and actually look at both sides of a conflict you get labeled as siding with the enemy because the red scare or some shit like that. That sort of cold war argumentative strategy is not only outdated but defeats the purpose of open discussion.

https://www.newser.com/story/240999/russ...trike.html

And now the media is unanimously covering this one story to get the same american war machine that invaded Iraq rolling again. The kremlin is warning that we could be one step away from an all out war all so that we got to show the size of our dick to Xi Jinping and Kim Jung Un. And that isn't to say we haven't been on the brink of war in the recent past, but hey one of these times it might not be a false alarm and might actually break out. And yeah let's never question US intelligence agencies because it's not like they've ever been wrong about anything before.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion

And you better get your tin foil hat on because the CIA and many other federal level agencies have been using lies and deception as one of their primary tools for ages now. They even planned a false flag on US soil just to justify a full scale war with Cuba in the 60s. It wasn't stopped till JFK put the plug on it and you see what happened to him, didn't ya?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

Quote:The proposals called for the (CIA) or other US government operatives to commit acts of terrorism against American civilians and military targets, blaming it on the Cuban government, and using it to justify a war against Cuba.

But yeah no, the CIA/feds nor any other government funded agency that has a history of meddling in world events would never lie to you to push hidden rhetoric. And it's absolutely foolish to question the narrative that everyone else is unanimously following because their TV told them so. /s

If this escalates to war, this will not be as simple as the Iraq War or Afghan War.
It's also very possible that Trump might be playing the world.

Good. Using chemical weapons in war is an international crime. Obama/Hilary would've done the same to show that the US is not afraid to act.

(Apr 8, 2017, 06:32 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ]
(Apr 8, 2017, 02:18 PM)General Rickets Wrote: [ -> ]
(Apr 8, 2017, 11:17 AM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ]
(Apr 8, 2017, 01:04 AM)SourLemon Wrote: [ -> ]
(Apr 7, 2017, 07:24 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ]I actually hope that syria and russia strike back.

Why dont you fucking move to Syria and fucking join the rest of them since you seem to be on their side.

You pretty like the word "fucking"huh? I dont think your dad would like to see you beeing so evil

Keep it on topic or take your flaming elsewhere.

As for your statement you must be high or something, you just said you want World War Three.

lol

This is a serious thread, if you find it funny that there is a possibility of World War Three on the horizon then you need to re-evaluate your life.

(Apr 9, 2017, 05:02 PM)General Rickets Wrote: [ -> ]
(Apr 8, 2017, 06:32 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ]
(Apr 8, 2017, 02:18 PM)General Rickets Wrote: [ -> ]
(Apr 8, 2017, 11:17 AM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ]
(Apr 8, 2017, 01:04 AM)SourLemon Wrote: [ -> ]Why dont you fucking move to Syria and fucking join the rest of them since you seem to be on their side.

You pretty like the word "fucking"huh? I dont think your dad would like to see you beeing so evil

Keep it on topic or take your flaming elsewhere.

As for your statement you must be high or something, you just said you want World War Three.

lol

This is a serious thread, if you find it funny that there is a possibility of World War Three on the horizon then you need to re-evaluate your life.

I doubt very much it would escalate to that.

Russia knows it would be foolish to not only attack the United States, but also a member of NATO. Both countries have enough nukes to wipe out the human population several times over so there would be no winners anyway.

Proxy wars are what will become the norm, especially in the Middle East where a lot of dictatorships are starting to collapse.

Dan

Nudelsalat im Panzer

Adam James

General Rickets

Taylor

Nudelsalat im Panzer

George

Nudelsalat im Panzer

Dig

Preditor

Nev

Dig

Zeyon

General Rickets

George

Limelight - Link watcher
You're about to enter the following site: https://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n24/seymour-m-hersh/whose-sarin Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.