+- Limelight Forums (https://limelightgaming.net/forums)
+-- Forum: Entertainment (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-197.html)
+--- Forum: Discussions (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-223.html)
+---- Forum: Serious Discussions (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-329.html)
+---- Thread: Gun Control (/thread-10644.html)
RE: Gun Control - jarz - Jul 11, 2016
RE: Gun Control - The Rock - Jul 11, 2016
(Jul 11, 2016, 03:50 PM)Enzyme Wrote:(Jul 11, 2016, 03:10 PM)Mr.Sir Wrote: I don't get it why Americans love their precious guns so much that they ignore the fact that they are the main reason of all these shootingsAmericans are paying a big price for the right to own a firearm. I just wonder if it's worth all the lives that have been lost and will be lost in the future.
You both are right , guns should be illegal and driver license should be +18
RE: Gun Control - Preditor - Jul 11, 2016
Topics and discussions like these never get anywhere amirite.
RE: Gun Control - Soviethooves - Jul 11, 2016
(Jul 11, 2016, 08:12 PM)Preditor Wrote: Topics and discussions like these never get anywhere amirite.
Welcome to the US Gun Control thre....I mean Gun Control discussion.
RE: Gun Control - George - Jul 12, 2016
RE: Gun Control - jarz - Jul 12, 2016
RE: Gun Control - Safira - Jul 12, 2016
'peaceful members of society'
If you're gonna shoot someone with intent to kill/seriously harm them because they're on your property I wouldn't call that peaceful, just saying.
Refer to my previous post for my stance on all this, I can't be fiddled to start quoting and replying.
RE: Gun Control - Venom - Jul 12, 2016
(Jul 12, 2016, 05:33 AM)Safira Wrote: 'peaceful members of society'
If you're gonna shoot someone with intent to kill/seriously harm them because they're on your property I wouldn't call that peaceful, just saying.
Refer to my previous post for my stance on all this, I can't be fiddled to start quoting and replying.
You can't just shoot someone because they're on your property. Under the Castle Doctrine, there are a couple things that have to be in place to shoot someone.
-An intruder must be making (or have made) an attempt to unlawfully or forcibly enter an occupied residence, business, or vehicle.
-The intruder must be acting unlawfully (the castle doctrine does not allow a right to use force against officers of the law, acting in the course of their legal duties).
-The occupant(s) of the home must reasonably believe the intruder intends to inflict serious bodily harm or death upon an occupant of the home. Some states apply the Castle Doctrine if the occupant(s) of the home reasonably believe the intruder intends to commit a lesser felony such as arson or burglary.
-The occupant(s) of the home must not have provoked or instigated an intrusion; or, provoked/instigated an intruder's threat or use of deadly force.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_doctrine#Conditions_of_use
RE: Gun Control - jarz - Jul 12, 2016
(Jul 12, 2016, 05:33 AM)Safira Wrote: 'peaceful members of society'
If you're gonna shoot someone with intent to kill/seriously harm them because they're on your property I wouldn't call that peaceful, just saying.
Refer to my previous post for my stance on all this, I can't be fiddled to start quoting and replying.
Are you to greet an intruder kindly at your door? What if you need to defend yourself from an intruder? Is it too mean to defend yourself now a days?
RE: Gun Control - Toxic - Jul 12, 2016
(Jul 12, 2016, 05:33 AM)Safira Wrote: 'peaceful members of society'
If you're gonna shoot someone with intent to kill/seriously harm them because they're on your property I wouldn't call that peaceful, just saying.
Refer to my previous post for my stance on all this, I can't be fiddled to start quoting and replying.
Peace and love, but I will shoot a person that invades my home intent on attacking me. I couldn't care less if they're leaving with some of my belongings. If I can chase them off, great; after that point I let the police deal with it. However, I'm not left with much choice if my life or well-being is put at risk.
RE: Gun Control - margo25 - Aug 22, 2016
Hello! Should guns be allowed at schools? Certainly, no! Despite it is dangerous, children shouldn't be accustomed to violence and aggression, if you're anxious about this problem as well, follow this source to read more https://bigpaperwriter.com/blog/gun-control-essay-eats-shoots-and-leaves
RE: Gun Control - jarz - Aug 22, 2016
(Aug 22, 2016, 07:36 AM)margo25 Wrote: Hello! Should guns be allowed at schools? Certainly, no! Despite it is dangerous, children shouldn't be accustomed to violence and aggression, if you're anxious about this problem as well, follow this source to read more https://bigpaperwriter.com/blog/gun-control-essay-eats-shoots-and-leaves
Not sure if bot... or...
RE: Gun Control - Mr.Sir - Aug 23, 2016
(Aug 22, 2016, 08:57 AM)jarz Wrote:(Aug 22, 2016, 07:36 AM)margo25 Wrote: Hello! Should guns be allowed at schools? Certainly, no! Despite it is dangerous, children shouldn't be accustomed to violence and aggression, if you're anxious about this problem as well, follow this source to read more https://bigpaperwriter.com/blog/gun-control-essay-eats-shoots-and-leaves
Not sure if bot... or...
1 post, joined this month, probs :P
RE: Gun Control - goigle - Sep 27, 2016
(Jul 12, 2016, 04:32 AM)George Wrote:(Jul 11, 2016, 08:40 AM)jarz Wrote:(Jul 11, 2016, 05:13 AM)George Wrote: Having a police officer in schools might be beneficial, but they don't need to be armed.
It's a cop. Cops have guns.
SRO's (School Resource Officers) get calls just like all other officers during their time on duty.
Then they're not "School Resource Officers" if they're not at the school.
Yes, yes they are. Police patrol "sectors" or "precincts" typically further subdivided into zones. Individual officers (depending on the agency) are assigned a zone. A SRO is just an officer with a much smaller zone, which will be the school + the surrounding area.
<snipped quote>
Now, on to your bit about the AR-15? So ONLY 285 people have been killed by them, no biggie. I mean, these guns hold no actual use for the standard civilian. Home protection doesn't require a rifle capable of shooting 25 rounds in a couple of seconds.
Any random homeowner with an AR15 is not going to be shooting 25 rounds in "a couple of seconds." That's total hyperbole. The big advantage for having a large magazine is that most homeowners will not be in stressful situations where they will need to use the gun often enough for them to be used to those situations. Not having to reload is a huge advantage for them there, as they will struggle reloading.
RE: Gun Control - Hungames - Sep 27, 2016
[quote pid='132325' dateline='1474989738']
[quote pid='116382' dateline='1468294364']
SNIP
[/quote]
Any random homeowner with an AR15 is not going to be shooting 25 rounds in "a couple of seconds." That's total hyperbole. The big advantage for having a large magazine is that most homeowners will not be in stressful situations where they will need to use the gun often enough for them to be used to those situations. Not having to reload is a huge advantage for them there, as they will struggle reloading.
[/quote]
Having a larger magazine as stated reduces the chance of needing to reload, as said. Although a 5.56 or 7.62 could over penetrate, it has a lot of stopping power, much more than a standard 9mm. If someone has broken in, and they are armed, are you going to want to hit them with a large calibre bullet with lots of energy behind it or a small calibre bullet with less power? Furthermore, the idea of 25 rounds in seconds is not very truthful. Most civilian rifles I have seen don't go further than semi-auto. If you are nervous, shaking, and scared, you won't be able to fire 25 rounds on semi auto in seconds. If a weapon is fully automatic, it is classed as an assault rifle (by military terms not politicians ideas) which is not only dangerous for home defense, but also heavily restricted. If you start shooting in full auto while shaking, your shoulder is taking a beating and over penetration is likely going to happen. Finally, during a break in, you won't be thinking about controlling kick from a pistol, just about stopping an attacker. If you fire too quick on an attacker, you could hurt your wrists taking you out of the fight. If you shoot from one shoulder, and you hurt it, you have another one and quite possibly a bed or dresser to lay a rifle on where you are hiding.
One last thing, before someone goes off telling me just say call the cops and hide, no, just no. When seconds count, you can't guarantee your safety by calling the cops. If you are in a crowded city with tons of traffic or in the country, cops can be far away, so having a firearm is beneficial
Sorry about spelling mistakes, typed on my phone with autocorrect messing things up