+- Limelight Forums (https://limelightgaming.net/forums)
+-- Forum: Entertainment (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-197.html)
+--- Forum: Discussions (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-223.html)
+--- Thread: Staff and rule violations comparing to members (/thread-23781.html)
RE: Admin: Doctor Internet - Kurdayeti - Dec 3, 2018
(Dec 3, 2018, 06:16 PM)Tom_ Wrote:(Dec 3, 2018, 06:14 PM)Kurdayeti Wrote:(Dec 3, 2018, 06:12 PM)ZooM Wrote: If I get perma-banned parking a Ferrari as the Police Sergeant.
This would get me 10 perma-bans.
+Support
100%
Looks like being staff really helps, so much for that. --'
If you guys are so Salty Towards the community why are you here, your welcome to leave...
We're not salty, this is a simple discussion thread. You can leave though, as you seem to not like this discussion. None forces you to stay mate.
RE: Admin: Doctor Internet - Cole - Dec 3, 2018
Once again taking the situation out of context. It was an ACCIDENT. Here's a definition of accident as you're clearly ignoring this major fact throughout every post (from Google, if it's wrong you'll need to contact Google support): "an unfortunate incident that happens unexpectedly, and unintentionally".
But seriously, just give up. You've given no proper counter-arguments to anything anyone has said. Your main point is "being staff doesn't get you punished". Which for a starters is wrong, and secondly, has no proof to back it up.
RE: Admin: Doctor Internet - Enzyme - Dec 3, 2018
Quote:It's very simple, I want to discuss and see what others think would happen if this user was in fact not an administrator. This is a simple thread which encourages people to discuss topics in the community and which doesn't violate any rules at all. If someone does not like this thread, they are free to leave.
You're discussing a case you were not involved with, and where you don't sit on all the facts. As I see it, you're targeting Internet here for some reason. You're being too specific in your discussion, and you should rather highlight differences between staff-members and players in cases instead. Focusing/targeting one specific staff-member will just throw the thread into shit as you're making it personal about that one staff member instead of highlighting something that could actually be an issue instead. The case you're quoting has been reviewed and concluded. That's a dead case, and it will remain that. If you actually want to have some purpose with this thread, then stop being so specific as it only appears that you're more of a source of salt rather than discussion.
RE: Admin: Doctor Internet - Kurdayeti - Dec 3, 2018
Quote:Posting rules
- 7. Titles of forums should be relevant and accurately describe the content.
I tried to change the title which accurately describe the content, but @Doctor Internet decided to change it back to "Admin: Doctor Internet".
(This post was last modified: 43 minutes ago by Doctor Internet. Edited 3 times in total. Edit Reason: Changed title. )
Stop this behavior and stop trying to find a reason to delete this thread and in that way delete criticism!
RE: Admin: Doctor Internet - pufitee - Dec 3, 2018
(Dec 3, 2018, 06:14 PM)Kurdayeti Wrote:(Dec 3, 2018, 06:12 PM)Tom_ Wrote:(Dec 3, 2018, 06:11 PM)Kurdayeti Wrote: It's very simple, I want to discuss and see what others think would happen if this user was in fact not an administrator. This is a simple thread which encourages people to discuss topics in the community and which doesn't violate any rules at all. If someone does not like this thread, they are free to leave.
Is there something wrong to ask for others opinions and open up discussions internally in the community? If so, how and why?
From what I saw in the PR it was all IC until he accidentally body slammed someone, No Big Deal. We can all see that you have just started this to start arguments and get attention
https://youtu.be/sSQ5hu8hxsc
- Definitely not an accident, look at the video as it shows clear intent.
- He did not apologize for IC even though it's the user's first time, he only started caring and apologizing when he was reported which put him in a bad spot.
grape is a very good friend of mine i met back in my FL days, he decided to come on limelight for fun. at the time my clan (synargy) had a fat base and i decided to let him in the clan for him to enjoy limelight much more with meeting alot of amazing people who were in my clan. i cant really remember what happend b4 but he wanted someone to open the door to put him inside as the video obviously shows. doc is seen then looking away rapidly which made him accidentally body slam grape. garrysmod is really glichy for moving bodys around, its happend many times before to me and many other people.
RE: Admin: Doctor Internet - Kurdayeti - Dec 3, 2018
(Dec 3, 2018, 06:19 PM)Enzyme Wrote:Quote:It's very simple, I want to discuss and see what others think would happen if this user was in fact not an administrator. This is a simple thread which encourages people to discuss topics in the community and which doesn't violate any rules at all. If someone does not like this thread, they are free to leave.
You're discussing a case you were not involved with, and where you don't sit on all the facts. As I see it, you're targeting Internet here for some reason. You're being too specific in your discussion, and you should rather highlight differences between staff-members and players in cases instead. Focusing/targeting one specific staff-member will just throw the thread into shit as you're making it personal about that one staff member instead of highlighting something that could actually be an issue instead. The case you're quoting has been reviewed and concluded. That's a dead case, and it will remain that. If you actually want to have some purpose with this thread, then stop being so specific as it only appears that you're more of a source of salt rather than discussion.
Quoting;
Quote:If this would be a member but not a staff, what do you guys think would happen to that member? Opinions and thoughts?
Doesn't matter if it's Doc or not. I took him as an example and wanted to see what people say as this was clear bodyslamming and therefore a violation. How is this personal to Doctor Internet? Let me define something for you:
Personal definition - belonging to or affecting a particular person rather than anyone else.
This belongs to ALL STAFF and that's why I changed the title from "Admin: Doctor Internet" to "Staff and rule violations comparing to members". Yet, Doc changed it back to Admin: Doctor Internet
RE: Staff and rule violations comparing to members - Cole - Dec 3, 2018
Alright, well I'm going to assume this is a troll thread and stop wasting my time here. I'd recommend everyone else do the same. He is clearly ignoring the facts of the incident and just assuming so, yup, that's basically it.
RE: Admin: Doctor Internet - Kurdayeti - Dec 3, 2018
(Dec 3, 2018, 06:19 PM)Kurdayeti Wrote:Quote:Posting rules
- 7. Titles of forums should be relevant and accurately describe the content.
I tried to change the title which accurately describe the content, but @Doctor Internet decided to change it back to "Admin: Doctor Internet".
(This post was last modified: 43 minutes ago by Doctor Internet. Edited 3 times in total. Edit Reason: Changed title. )
Stop this behavior and stop trying to find a reason to delete this thread and in that way delete criticism!
I'd like to, respectfully, ask for an explanation to this inappropriate action and request @Doctor Internet to calm down.
Thanks.
RE: Staff and rule violations comparing to members - Kurdayeti - Dec 3, 2018
(Dec 3, 2018, 06:23 PM)Cole_ Wrote: Alright, well I'm going to assume this is a troll thread and stop wasting my time here. I'd recommend everyone else do the same. He is clearly ignoring the facts of the incident and just assuming so, yup, that's basically it.
You can assume that, but it's not a troll thread. I also recommend people to stop discussing here if they don't like it, although it's up to them.
RE: Staff and rule violations comparing to members - pufitee - Dec 3, 2018
this is a very funny thread thanks for the entertainment
RE: Staff and rule violations comparing to members - Kurdayeti - Dec 3, 2018
(Dec 3, 2018, 06:28 PM)Pufitee Wrote: this is a very funny thread thanks for the entertainment
I respect your opinion but please stay relevant to the discussions you take part in next time.
RE: Staff and rule violations comparing to members - pufitee - Dec 3, 2018
(Dec 3, 2018, 06:29 PM)Kurdayeti Wrote:no(Dec 3, 2018, 06:28 PM)Pufitee Wrote: this is a very funny thread thanks for the entertainment
I respect your opinion but please stay relevant to the discussions you take part in next time.
RE: Staff and rule violations comparing to members - ZooM - Dec 3, 2018
(Dec 3, 2018, 06:23 PM)Cole_ Wrote: Alright, well I'm going to assume this is a troll thread and stop wasting my time here. I'd recommend everyone else do the same. He is clearly ignoring the facts of the incident and just assuming so, yup, that's basically it.
Cole, you are clearly upset about this thread. Encouraging others to not take part of a thread that is bringing up an important question is just straight up disgusting.
You don't like the thread, leave it and don't read it.
RE: Staff and rule violations comparing to members - Kurdayeti - Dec 3, 2018
(Dec 3, 2018, 06:33 PM)ZooM Wrote:(Dec 3, 2018, 06:23 PM)Cole_ Wrote: Alright, well I'm going to assume this is a troll thread and stop wasting my time here. I'd recommend everyone else do the same. He is clearly ignoring the facts of the incident and just assuming so, yup, that's basically it.
Cole, you are clearly upset about this thread. Encouraging others to not take part of a thread that is bringing up an important question is just straight up disgusting.
You don't like the thread, leave it and don't read it.
I completely agree with @
RE: Staff and rule violations comparing to members - BlackDog - Dec 3, 2018
(Dec 3, 2018, 06:36 PM)Kurdayeti Wrote: I completely agree with @ZooM as it's very disrespectful to encourage people to not take part in a thread just because you dislike it. If you don't like a thread, you can simply leave as you're not obliged to participate.
Would it not be disrespectful though to discard his opinion that people should not engage you?
To do so would make you a hypocrite, as you wish people to respect your opinion, but you do not wish to respect their opinion.