(Jun 4, 2020, 12:01 AM)Project Wrote: [ -> ]I was wondering when would show up.
Because for Christianity celebrates that, it doesn't stop a group of people (LGBT+ people in this case) from celebrating another thing? Much like other religions are celebrating different things at same time.
Let people celebrate their freedoms much like you and I are able to without being looked down upon.
I'll focus on the homosexual side of things.
Equality means sameness, if two things are equal it means they are the same. Are same-sex relationships the same as - equal to - heterosexual ones. That's the question and I would say no. And it does have anything to do with values or morals, you don't have to think the homosexual act is sinful in order to see that the equality of these two is a nonsensical concept. These two things are different in a profoundly significant way.
The union of a man and a woman has in principle the potential to create - of itself - new life. The union of two people of the same gender does not ever have that potential, and never, and will never, and has never. Again, even if you think the two unions are morally equal, which is not a biblical thought but even if you think it, you cannot say they are equal in every respect because they are certainly not equal in this respect - a pretty important one.
You have on one hand a thing, a heterosexual relationship, which can create people. On the other hand you have a thing, a homosexual union, which cannot create people. Now imagine for a second that you're starting a civilisation from scratch with no prior knowledge of marriage, politics, not even the Bible, and you see there are all types of relationships - but one kind of relationship has this unique ability and habit of creating new people. When you're trying to work out what to call all these relationships, don't you call that one something different? Something that signifies the incredible power and responsibility that comes with it?
This potential of the heterosexual union to create people is largely why marriage exists, and it's why society has cherished and protected this institution because it understood that a union which might create a person should be stable, it should be permanent, it should be protected, it should be faithful, it should be monogamous. Every study has shown that children fair much better in stable two-parent households than not. So marriage exists as the foundation of the family unit, and the family unit exists as the foundation for civilisation.
If marriages are strong, the family is strong. If the family is strong, society is strong. It's that simple. Historically, one of the most crucial and elemental functions of marriage was to create the basis upon which - and the context within which - children are created, and born, and raised.
Homosexual relationships should not be normalised for this reason. It is disordered and detracts from the purpose of an intimate relationship, that is to create new life.