Limelight Forums

Full Version: Drug pots being removed after game crashes
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Explain your suggestion, in detail: 
Let's just say you started growing weed. And used Uv light

In 20 minutes you'll recieve 6 weed per each pot.


Second Harvest you'll recieve 8 weed per each pot.

Third Harvest You'll recieve 10 weed per each pot.


4th harvest you'll recieve 12 weed each pot.


5th harvest you'll recieve 14 weed each pot.

6th harvest you'll recieve 15 weed each pot.
Explain why the suggestion should be implemented:
You Spent 2 hours to reach 15 weed per pot level.(20x6 min's)

Then for some reason you have to rejoin.

(game crash,server crash,connection problem,etc)

Even you join back and see your pots are there and still growing. They will disappear.
You have to spend 2 more hours to reach same level. 


Suggested solution: 
If player is timed out or disconnected.drug pot's should stay in server for 5 minutes and the player joins back in same amounth of minutes Player can keep doing his business.


Please vote your opinion.Thanks for everyone who spent their time to read and vote.
Why did you write your suggestion a second time ? There is no need for.
+ Support 

Server crashed multiple times yesterday as I was doing weed farming; had to restart from 6 "weed" everytime I came back from the crash. Spoke to staff, could not be reimbursed when I had around 11/12 weed ready to harvest which is quite the large sum of money. Also, when I rejoined; my UV light wasn't placed into my inventory but the pots & seeds were.
Lmao legit duplicated your thread
I made my suggestion ages ago with limited day poll and only 3 people could vote so its being a while and didn't result anythink
(Dec 3, 2018, 04:27 PM)SickBennyAlex Wrote: [ -> ]I made my suggestion ages ago with limited day poll and only 3 people could vote so its being a while and didn't result anythink

Well, who's fault was that for limiting it?
(Dec 3, 2018, 04:28 PM)Doctor Internet Wrote: [ -> ]
(Dec 3, 2018, 04:27 PM)SickBennyAlex Wrote: [ -> ]I made my suggestion ages ago with limited day poll and only 3 people could vote so its being a while and didn't result anythink

Well, who's fault was that for limiting it?
My fault and didn't blame anyone. Reason of -support ?
-support
(Dec 3, 2018, 04:39 PM)StephanGH Wrote: [ -> ]-support

Please explain i had to repost it was +support before Smile
(Dec 3, 2018, 04:42 PM)SickBennyAlex Wrote: [ -> ]
(Dec 3, 2018, 04:39 PM)StephanGH Wrote: [ -> ]-support

Please explain i had to repost it was +support before Smile

I didn't understand the suggestion before and thought you meant something else.

So -support I don't find this necessary
+support good
+Support
"ages ago"

31. October 2018, thats pretty recent if you ask me haha
I felt like I was having a stroke reading this. -support unnecessary addition 
+support
Pages: 1 2