There's already a PR for the same thing, what differs?
I already stated a conclusion on this in the main PR or at least one of the main PRs.
The police officer had the belief that you were corrupt or a dictator hence the taze and possibly detain ment but we can't know for sure.
You were tazed, believed to be a corrupt president or a dictator. I don't see how this breaks 3.1
I don't know what you are talking about "Main PRs" but my video clearly shows 3.1 violation.
3.1 - Your character needs to have a valid in-character reason for their actions, especially ones that harm or otherwise affect other players. The action needs to be appropriate to the reason e.g massacring the entire police force is not an appropriate response to being hit with a baton by a single corrupt officer.
What is the valid IC reason for his action? I was to no threat to him.
It was necessary as other means of acting wouldnt have the slightest chance to succeed.
(As you can see in the video, i was instantly shot down after tazing that persident.) (What else was i suppoed to do, really? There were cases that were ruled against me because former officers that ive demoted as a chief came up to me and just shot me down without a word. I fail to see how this, especially as it was not meant to be lethal, would be unnecessary.) Id also like to point out that i wasnt the agressor in the entire roleplay situation that was going on for hours. It was the president afterall that fired his employeed, threatened them, mistreated them, and constantly started lockdowns over the protest, and so on. It just had reached a point where actions had to be taken.
Apart from that, nothing i can think of.
I believe this part of the situation was resolved IC, with the demotion.
Taze was inappropriate but nothing punishment worthy.
There was some reason behind it, in character.
Denied.