(May 19, 2018, 04:16 AM)bananen_ephihal Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 04:05 AM)lad Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 03:05 AM)bananen_ephihal Wrote: [ -> ]I don't have to prove anything here, it's only YOU that have to prove what we broke. I said we alredy explained everything, if you don't understand just re read all my posts. We don't have any videos. Thats why we asking for it to be concluded by an admin.
bruh, im saying yall did something wrong, no vid from your end to support your points
yo bruh, im saying yall dont have evidence, we did nothing bro, like c'mon bro, yall have to try harder.
what do you gain from typing the way i type - show us evidence of u not rdming the medic, u not rdming bitmo and u not rdming us and also stealing car without valid reason. u did the wrong, you messed with the rules and now you gotsa pay for it PAL
(May 19, 2018, 05:25 AM)lad Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 04:16 AM)bananen_ephihal Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 04:05 AM)lad Wrote: [ -> ]bruh, im saying yall did something wrong, no vid from your end to support your points
yo bruh, im saying yall dont have evidence, we did nothing bro, like c'mon bro, yall have to try harder.
what do you gain from typing the way i type - show us evidence of u not rdming the medic, u not rdming bitmo and u not rdming us and also stealing car without valid reason. u did the wrong, you messed with the rules and now you gotsa pay for it PAL
yeah what do u gain from that
i dont think its allowed 2 just kill someone for mugging while ur building u shouldve put us under fearrp or somethin bud. u also have to have a chop shop to be stealin cars n such
(May 19, 2018, 05:25 AM)lad Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 04:16 AM)bananen_ephihal Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 04:05 AM)lad Wrote: [ -> ]bruh, im saying yall did something wrong, no vid from your end to support your points
yo bruh, im saying yall dont have evidence, we did nothing bro, like c'mon bro, yall have to try harder.
what do you gain from typing the way i type - show us evidence of u not rdming the medic, u not rdming bitmo and u not rdming us and also stealing car without valid reason. u did the wrong, you messed with the rules and now you gotsa pay for it PAL
Lol there are no rules how I can type so. I aint showing you a single damn thing. Insted you Show me evidence of Me RDMing the Medic, show Me evidence of Me RDMing you, Show Me evidence of Stealing your car. You messed with the wrong guys ingame and you had to pay for it PAL
(May 19, 2018, 07:17 AM)Bismo Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 05:25 AM)lad Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 04:16 AM)bananen_ephihal Wrote: [ -> ]yo bruh, im saying yall dont have evidence, we did nothing bro, like c'mon bro, yall have to try harder.
what do you gain from typing the way i type - show us evidence of u not rdming the medic, u not rdming bitmo and u not rdming us and also stealing car without valid reason. u did the wrong, you messed with the rules and now you gotsa pay for it PAL
yeah what do u gain from that
i dont think its allowed 2 just kill someone for mugging while ur building u shouldve put us under fearrp or somethin bud. u also have to have a chop shop to be stealin cars n such
It’s your fault starting to build under a critical time and not being aware of your sourrundings. Why should I own a chop shop when I have no intention to Steal cars and ask Money for them as a bussiness?
(May 19, 2018, 07:24 AM)bananen_ephihal Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 07:17 AM)Bismo Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 05:25 AM)lad Wrote: [ -> ]what do you gain from typing the way i type - show us evidence of u not rdming the medic, u not rdming bitmo and u not rdming us and also stealing car without valid reason. u did the wrong, you messed with the rules and now you gotsa pay for it PAL
yeah what do u gain from that
i dont think its allowed 2 just kill someone for mugging while ur building u shouldve put us under fearrp or somethin bud. u also have to have a chop shop to be stealin cars n such
It’s your fault starting to build under a critical time and not being aware of your sourrundings. Why should I own a chop shop when I have no intention to Steal cars and ask Money for them as a bussiness?
ima keep it real with you chief, the only way you CAN steal cars is if you have a chop shop and are plaNning on sellin the shits back. you just admited to stealing bitmos car without valid background rp. dosnt llook good 4 you FELLA
(May 19, 2018, 05:19 PM)lad Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 07:24 AM)bananen_ephihal Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 07:17 AM)Bismo Wrote: [ -> ]yeah what do u gain from that
i dont think its allowed 2 just kill someone for mugging while ur building u shouldve put us under fearrp or somethin bud. u also have to have a chop shop to be stealin cars n such
It’s your fault starting to build under a critical time and not being aware of your sourrundings. Why should I own a chop shop when I have no intention to Steal cars and ask Money for them as a bussiness?
ima keep it real with you chief, the only way you CAN steal cars is if you have a chop shop and are plaNning on sellin the shits back. you just admited to stealing bitmos car without valid background rp. dosnt llook good 4 you FELLA
i ain't stealing shit, im your chief and when you say stuff like this it won't work. dosent look good 4 u PAL
(May 19, 2018, 05:25 PM)bananen_ephihal Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 05:19 PM)lad Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 07:24 AM)bananen_ephihal Wrote: [ -> ]It’s your fault starting to build under a critical time and not being aware of your sourrundings. Why should I own a chop shop when I have no intention to Steal cars and ask Money for them as a bussiness?
ima keep it real with you chief, the only way you CAN steal cars is if you have a chop shop and are plaNning on sellin the shits back. you just admited to stealing bitmos car without valid background rp. dosnt llook good 4 you FELLA
i ain't stealing shit, im your chief and when you say stuff like this it won't work. dosent look good 4 u PAL
What do you gain from talking like me? listen you stole the car and didnt sell it back. you broke the rules and gotta prove that u didnt which you arnt proving.
(May 19, 2018, 05:28 PM)lad Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 05:25 PM)bananen_ephihal Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 05:19 PM)lad Wrote: [ -> ]ima keep it real with you chief, the only way you CAN steal cars is if you have a chop shop and are plaNning on sellin the shits back. you just admited to stealing bitmos car without valid background rp. dosnt llook good 4 you FELLA
i ain't stealing shit, im your chief and when you say stuff like this it won't work. dosent look good 4 u PAL
What do you gain from talking like me? listen you stole the car and didnt sell it back. you broke the rules and gotta prove that u didnt which you arnt proving.
I aint talking like you pal, dis is my own way m8. nah i ain't gotta prove anything for you, you gotta prove 4 me that i broke any rule. dosen't look good for u PAL
(May 19, 2018, 05:37 PM)lad Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 05:31 PM)bananen_ephihal Wrote: [ -> ] (May 19, 2018, 05:28 PM)lad Wrote: [ -> ]What do you gain from talking like me? listen you stole the car and didnt sell it back. you broke the rules and gotta prove that u didnt which you arnt proving.
I aint talking like you pal, dis is my own way m8. nah i ain't gotta prove anything for you, you gotta prove 4 me that i broke any rule. dosen't look good for u PAL
- Do not impersonate other members of Limelight.
you are breaking rules
impersonate? What are you on about m8, i ain't impersonateing anyone, dosen't look god pal.
Closed whilst I review. Bickering doesn't help.
1. If they robbed Fealz and Bananen, then they should
accept the consequences of being hit back. I think it was a fair consequence. They got the right people, they had a valid reason to get revenge so I think it's fair. The reporters robbed the wrong people, and they got the same back. The biggest concern really at this is whether or not they verified the targets well enough, or if this hit could have affected the wrong people. The video doesn't paint a clear image on this though as they were taken by surprise.
The recording shows that (I presume) Bismo was armed with an AK. It's hard to determine if the attackers saw this or not, but it's worth pointing out that the video show's him having an AK on his back as it's relevant regarding the accused players choice to execute/kill instead of taking them under gunpoint.
2. I think it's clear that the shooter
didn't intend to kill the paramedic. When the shooter opened fire on the paramedic, the officer looks towards the shooter and accidentally puts him in harm's way while doing this. The paramedic was hit in the crossfire, and the paramedic wasn't directly targeted. I think it'd be unfair to track how the gun-model moves (in millimetres) to determine if it was done on purpose or not. Third person models are janky as hell and aren't necessarily a trustworthy piece of evidence to show intent in this case. The evidence shows that the officer was targeted and that the officer raised the paramedic in harm's way.
(Nightmare asked for input on this case, here is my input. I will not conclude the case)
(May 21, 2018, 12:15 AM)Enzyme Wrote: [ -> ]1. If they robbed Fealz and Bananen, then they should accept the consequences of being hit back. I think it was a fair consequence. They got the right people, they had a valid reason to get revenge so I think it's fair. The reporters robbed the wrong people, and they got the same back. The biggest concern really at this is whether or not they verified the targets well enough, or if this hit could have affected the wrong people. The video doesn't paint a clear image on this though as they were taken by surprise.
The recording shows that (I presume) Bismo was armed with an AK. It's hard to determine if the attackers saw this or not, but it's worth pointing out that the video show's him having an AK on his back as it's relevant regarding the accused players choice to execute/kill instead of taking them under gunpoint.
2. I think it's clear that the shooter didn't intend to kill the paramedic. When the shooter opened fire on the paramedic, the officer looks towards the shooter and accidentally puts him in harm's way while doing this. The paramedic was hit in the crossfire, and the paramedic wasn't directly targeted. I think it'd be unfair to track how the gun-model moves (in millimetres) to determine if it was done on purpose or not. Third person models are janky as hell and aren't necessarily a trustworthy piece of evidence to show intent in this case. The evidence shows that the officer was targeted and that the officer raised the paramedic in harm's way.
(Nightmare asked for input on this case, here is my input. I will not conclude the case)
Thank you for your input.
I just want to point out that me and Fealz had a discussion befor we did anything against them about if it was them and we identified that it was them, from their car and faces and clothing and we then proceeded to go in for attack. We also saw and identified the firearm on Bismos back as they where facing away from us.
(May 21, 2018, 12:15 AM)Enzyme Wrote: [ -> ]1. If they robbed Fealz and Bananen, then they should accept the consequences of being hit back. I think it was a fair consequence. They got the right people, they had a valid reason to get revenge so I think it's fair. The reporters robbed the wrong people, and they got the same back. The biggest concern really at this is whether or not they verified the targets well enough, or if this hit could have affected the wrong people. The video doesn't paint a clear image on this though as they were taken by surprise.
The recording shows that (I presume) Bismo was armed with an AK. It's hard to determine if the attackers saw this or not, but it's worth pointing out that the video show's him having an AK on his back as it's relevant regarding the accused players choice to execute/kill instead of taking them under gunpoint.
2. I think it's clear that the shooter didn't intend to kill the paramedic. When the shooter opened fire on the paramedic, the officer looks towards the shooter and accidentally puts him in harm's way while doing this. The paramedic was hit in the crossfire, and the paramedic wasn't directly targeted. I think it'd be unfair to track how the gun-model moves (in millimetres) to determine if it was done on purpose or not. Third person models are janky as hell and aren't necessarily a trustworthy piece of evidence to show intent in this case. The evidence shows that the officer was targeted and that the officer raised the paramedic in harm's way.
(Nightmare asked for input on this case, here is my input. I will not conclude the case)
but at the time of the shooting bismo posed no harm to the attackers, he had his physgun out because we were building. i also had my physgun out
Apologies in the delay in this case.
Before concluding, I'd like to speak with Enzyme regarding this to clear it up before I go ahead and finalize.
Cheers.
![[+]](/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
Spoiler![[Image: d5eaad40080e06f551c1f9d48024017a.png]](https://i.gyazo.com/d5eaad40080e06f551c1f9d48024017a.png)