Still these aren't good excuses. You guys need to make an appearance on peak days like Friday or Saturday. Like I've already said, you have a real life that takes priority, but you also have a commitment to these players. If you aren't even able to get on during low hours, it's time to pick someone who can. A bigger team would definitely help pick up the slack.
(Oct 7, 2017, 08:32 PM)Soviethooves Wrote: [ -> ]Still these aren't good excuses. You guys need to make an appearance on peak days like Friday or Saturday. Like I've already said, you have a real life that takes priority, but you also have a commitment to these players. If you aren't even able to get on during low hours, it's time to pick someone who can. A bigger team would definitely help pick up the slack.
The problem is, we can't make good staff come along.
I'd much rather have no staff at all, than an over-zealous staff member who might ban me for doing nothing wrong.
(Oct 7, 2017, 07:03 PM)Hungames Wrote: [ -> ]If we had enough staff that maybe 1 or 2 could be active during peak hours, that would be good. But a time requirement isn't.
I don't know if I'm supposed to say this (it doesn't seem like it could do much harm though), but there already is a time requirement.
Staff are supposed to have 25 hours a month at the very least, and if they don't meet this for a few months in a row they get HR intervention.
(Oct 7, 2017, 09:04 PM)Murdoch Murdoch Wrote: [ -> ]I'd much rather have no staff at all, than an over-zealous staff member who might ban me for doing nothing wrong.
>implying that isnt already the case
Meh, wouldn't hurt to have a larger staff team really. The question then becomes, how many people in this community are fit to become staff. It's not a huge amt. imo.
(Oct 7, 2017, 09:32 PM)Vauld Wrote: [ -> ]Meh, wouldn't hurt to have a larger staff team really. The question then becomes, how many people in this community are fit to become staff. It's not a huge amt. imo.
I think I belong to those who do fit to the team
NOT
(Oct 7, 2017, 09:32 PM)Vauld Wrote: [ -> ]Meh, wouldn't hurt to have a larger staff team really. The question then becomes, how many people in this community are fit to become staff. It's not a huge amt. imo.
I could name a dozen people off the top of my head fit for staff
For example
, a couple of the teachers, a few players etc. But defo DI.
(Oct 7, 2017, 10:02 PM)Faustin Wrote: [ -> ] (Oct 7, 2017, 09:32 PM)Vauld Wrote: [ -> ]Meh, wouldn't hurt to have a larger staff team really. The question then becomes, how many people in this community are fit to become staff. It's not a huge amt. imo.
I could name a dozen people off the top of my head fit for staff
For example , a couple of the teachers, a few players etc. But defo DI.
^
Doctor Internet "admined" my AHR event cause noone was on at that time. He did a fucking splendid job.
(Oct 7, 2017, 10:58 PM)Vauld Wrote: [ -> ]Faustin for SA.
That's the spirit!
(Oct 7, 2017, 10:58 PM)Vauld Wrote: [ -> ]Faustin for SA.
Just... No.
(Oct 7, 2017, 11:56 PM)roxas Wrote: [ -> ] (Oct 7, 2017, 10:58 PM)Vauld Wrote: [ -> ]Faustin for SA.
Just... No.
Sorry but who are you again?
Just demote that George guy
(Oct 8, 2017, 12:06 AM)George Wrote: [ -> ]Just demote that George guy
Good post
i'd say promote big man nightmare and hire big man moderator you know?