Jul 8, 2016, 05:04 PM
Jul 8, 2016, 05:21 PM
The people responsible deserve the death penalty for what they did.
Jul 8, 2016, 05:32 PM
(Jul 8, 2016, 05:04 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ]They had sniper rifles? Really?
In what world does a standard citizen need a sniper rifle?
The US needs to sort itself out.
They didn't have sniper rifles. They had regular rifles and were sniping with them.
Jul 8, 2016, 05:53 PM
Just want to show this.
Jul 8, 2016, 06:07 PM
(Jul 8, 2016, 05:04 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ]They had sniper rifles? Really?
In what world does a standard citizen need a sniper rifle?
Have you ever gone hunting before?????
Jul 8, 2016, 06:09 PM
(Jul 8, 2016, 06:07 PM)SourLemon Wrote: [ -> ](Jul 8, 2016, 05:04 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ]They had sniper rifles? Really?
In what world does a standard citizen need a sniper rifle?
Have you ever gone hunting before?????
Nope, never will.
Don't think every citizen hunts so why should every citizen be allowed to buy a rifle?
Jul 8, 2016, 06:09 PM
(Jul 8, 2016, 05:53 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ]
Just want to show this.
Another image with no merit. Let's go into detail now.
So far in 2016, around 566 people have been killed by police. Let's break down the data. Out of the 566 people killed so far this year, 136 have been black. That's 24%. About 49% of people killed by police so far are white. Now of those black people that were shot, 17% have been classified as unarmed. That means they didn't have a weapon in their hands. However, that doesn't take into account their vehicle as a weapon. Just looking at the data, most of those unarmed deaths involve the suspect being in a vehicle and possibly using it as a weapon. So they weren't really "unarmed".
Now let's look at 2015 too. In 2015, there were 1146 killed by police. 306 of them were black. That's 26%. Now if we look at the 2016 data, the deaths have went down 2%. So, so far in 2016, black people are dying less. Again looking at the same data, in 2015, 26% of the black people killed have been classified as unarmed. There is a 9% DROP in the amount of "unarmed black people" getting killed.
By looking at this data and not throwing in images with no merit, you can see that black people are dying less and less are dying unarmed. It's not hard to look for the facts, you just have to apply them.
Jul 8, 2016, 07:52 PM
(Jul 8, 2016, 05:04 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ]They had sniper rifles? Really?
In what world does a standard citizen need a sniper rifle?
The US needs to sort itself out.
A world founded on a frontier that required long-range rifles to, say, protect their cattle, deter robbers, or hunt. Such a rifle is protected under the 2nd amendment of our constitution.
Jul 8, 2016, 08:02 PM
(Jul 8, 2016, 07:52 PM)jarz Wrote: [ -> ](Jul 8, 2016, 05:04 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ]They had sniper rifles? Really?
In what world does a standard citizen need a sniper rifle?
The US needs to sort itself out.
A world founded on a frontier that required long-range rifles to, say, protect their cattle, deter robbers, or hunt. Such a rifle is protected under the 2nd amendment of our constitution.
And shoot police officers, apparently.
Jul 8, 2016, 08:03 PM
Let's get rid of this myth known as "gun control" now, why don't we?
Gun control. Something undoubtedly needed! To schmucks like Obama in the white house who has not lived a normal life for 2 decades, considering he has been a senator since 1996. To have such a polluted understanding of how normal citizens obtain legal firearms hurts our cause, the cause of protecting the 2nd amendment.
To him, and to all other pro-gun-control people, you just need to make a sign that says "NO GUNS ALLOWED" if you don't want people with guns to enter. It is sort of similar to Sweden's DON'T RAPE ME bracelets in hopes to deter refugees from raping the local population.
https://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06...x-attacks/
The kicker about all of this is that.. Why it's just an inanimate sign! You can walk right past it! And when criminal fucks do, it's a national controversy, and nobody knows what the fuck happened! And Obama then calls for MORE gun control.
Obama: yo why don't we make guns harder to get in the first place.
A reasonable suggestion. The problem with THIS is that they're targetting the wrong demographic. They're making guns harder for LEGAL, COMPLIANT, CIVILIANS to obtain them. They're NOT targetting the CRIMINAL, SCUMBAG, LOW SOCIETY gang-bangers that buy their guns for 3 zips and a dime bag off the corner of Barrett Ave and 23rd Street.
Let's do it again. The kicker about all of this is that.. Why criminals STILL HAVE GUNS! And since it's harder for legal citizens carry guns, they can't. Who's gonna stop criminals from committing crimes? And when criminal fucks do, it's a national controversy, and nobody knows what the fuck happened! And Obama then calls for MORE gun control.
It's a repetitive cycle.
Gun control. Something undoubtedly needed! To schmucks like Obama in the white house who has not lived a normal life for 2 decades, considering he has been a senator since 1996. To have such a polluted understanding of how normal citizens obtain legal firearms hurts our cause, the cause of protecting the 2nd amendment.
To him, and to all other pro-gun-control people, you just need to make a sign that says "NO GUNS ALLOWED" if you don't want people with guns to enter. It is sort of similar to Sweden's DON'T RAPE ME bracelets in hopes to deter refugees from raping the local population.
Limelight - Link watcher |
|
You're about to enter the following site: https://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/30/wristbands-stop-sex-attacks/ Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy. |
The kicker about all of this is that.. Why it's just an inanimate sign! You can walk right past it! And when criminal fucks do, it's a national controversy, and nobody knows what the fuck happened! And Obama then calls for MORE gun control.
Obama: yo why don't we make guns harder to get in the first place.
A reasonable suggestion. The problem with THIS is that they're targetting the wrong demographic. They're making guns harder for LEGAL, COMPLIANT, CIVILIANS to obtain them. They're NOT targetting the CRIMINAL, SCUMBAG, LOW SOCIETY gang-bangers that buy their guns for 3 zips and a dime bag off the corner of Barrett Ave and 23rd Street.
Let's do it again. The kicker about all of this is that.. Why criminals STILL HAVE GUNS! And since it's harder for legal citizens carry guns, they can't. Who's gonna stop criminals from committing crimes? And when criminal fucks do, it's a national controversy, and nobody knows what the fuck happened! And Obama then calls for MORE gun control.
It's a repetitive cycle.
Jul 8, 2016, 08:04 PM
(Jul 8, 2016, 08:02 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ](Jul 8, 2016, 07:52 PM)jarz Wrote: [ -> ](Jul 8, 2016, 05:04 PM)George Wrote: [ -> ]They had sniper rifles? Really?
In what world does a standard citizen need a sniper rifle?
The US needs to sort itself out.
A world founded on a frontier that required long-range rifles to, say, protect their cattle, deter robbers, or hunt. Such a rifle is protected under the 2nd amendment of our constitution.
And shoot police officers, apparently.
People with a functional brain know not to do that. It's not a problem with guns, it's a problem with racism against white people in America.
Jul 8, 2016, 08:41 PM
People seriously there's another thread about how you feel with gun control, take it to that.
Also it seems to me that people are only concerned about black people deaths and not the rest of the goddamn races that complete this country.
I said all lives matter because they do, it's not just about black people, and it's not just about the police. There's also statistics on white, asian, and even native americans that have been "killed by police".
ALSO "Killed by police" don't start ranting on that because if anything probably not even 10% of those kills weren't justified.
Everyone always notices the bad things police do but never the good, which they do EVERY DAY AND A HELL OF A LOT MORE THAN THE BAD SO STOP GROUPING THEM TOGETHER.
Also it seems to me that people are only concerned about black people deaths and not the rest of the goddamn races that complete this country.
I said all lives matter because they do, it's not just about black people, and it's not just about the police. There's also statistics on white, asian, and even native americans that have been "killed by police".
ALSO "Killed by police" don't start ranting on that because if anything probably not even 10% of those kills weren't justified.
Everyone always notices the bad things police do but never the good, which they do EVERY DAY AND A HELL OF A LOT MORE THAN THE BAD SO STOP GROUPING THEM TOGETHER.
Jul 8, 2016, 08:52 PM
Jul 8, 2016, 09:27 PM
(Jul 8, 2016, 08:41 PM)Preditor Wrote: [ -> ]I said all lives matter because they do, it's not just about black people, and it's not just about the police. There's also statistics on white, asian, and even native americans that have been "killed by police".
False.