Limelight Forums
Not an UBR - Printable Version

+- Limelight Forums (https://limelightgaming.net/forums)
+-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-198.html)
+--- Forum: Suspension Appeals (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-210.html)
+---- Forum: Denied (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-216.html)
+---- Thread: Not an UBR (/thread-25460.html)



Not an UBR - Apex - Jul 8, 2019

#1
Mar 31, 2018, 11:52 PM
[font=open_sansregular, Arial, sans-serif]Your Name:
 Apex

Ban ID:2901


Banned by: Safira @Safira 
Server: Main

Ban Reason: [b]PRA (9977)[/b] - RDM, Stepping on ragdolls, insulting

Why should you be unbanned?: I don't agree with the insulting aspect of this punishment, I'm sure Safira will remember that there was no insulting found, because it didn't happen; they merely said it happened. 

Evidence: https://limelightgaming.net/forums/showt...p?tid=9977 Evidence provided in this thread. Might be worth checking logs.[/font]



- Limelight Gaming - Jul 8, 2019

The staff-members have received your unban-request, Apex.

It will take a while for it to be reviewed.


RE: Not an UBR - Night - Jul 8, 2019

Forwarded to HR.


RE: Not an UBR - Apex - Jul 8, 2019

(Jul 8, 2019, 02:51 PM)Night Wrote: Forwarded to HR.

Many thanks


RE: Not an UBR - Night - Jul 8, 2019

I will say though, if your requesting log checks from 2016 that isn't feasible at all. We don't store logs for that long sadly.


RE: Not an UBR - Brynn - Jul 8, 2019

Quote:Limelight cannot be hold accountable for players who wish to appeal their bans which are two years old where logs could exclude the fact that Safira might have found insulting in the logs and proven that you had in fact not insulted ingame. 
You would have had more luck if you had paid attention to your previous UBR as we might have been able to do it then:
https://limelightgaming.net/forums/thread-15616.html

Since we can't exclude that this is not the case, and because you've failed to prove otherwise then the ban will remain on record as it is. 

Denied.
Ban will remain on record as is.

The case has already been reviewed enough times. Enzyme said it nice enough last time.