+- Limelight Forums (https://limelightgaming.net/forums)
+-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-198.html)
+--- Forum: Player Reports (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-209.html)
+---- Forum: Approved (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-213.html)
+---- Thread: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL (/thread-24167.html)
PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - ForceGhost - Jan 19, 2019
RE: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - Dutch - Jan 19, 2019
Those are just for decoration just to look cool, we havent even used that as defence.
Cause the picture clearly shows there arent any ladders going up to that roof.
I also been raided by admins on that spot mutiple times and i have never heard them say anything about it so i don't see a problem here.
RE: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - Night - Jan 19, 2019
Do you have evidence to show they were used as defensive fortifications?
RE: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - ForceGhost - Jan 19, 2019
The rule states building, not using. I could be wrong but this other PR I created didn't show usage.
https://limelightgaming.net/forums/thread-21526.html
RE: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - Cole - Jan 19, 2019
RE: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - Dutch - Jan 19, 2019
Well its just to look cool so its decoration not a defensive fortification.
TBH i don't know what the big deal is its just for decoration we haven't used it so......whats the big deal?
i mean you are making a PR for a bunch of sandbags on a roof of a building.
They are not even used for defending.
RE: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - ForceGhost - Jan 19, 2019
(Jan 19, 2019, 05:28 PM)DarkosNL Wrote: Well its just to look cool so its decoration not a defensive fortification.
That's a bit like me building a very clear doom fort and saying "It's just to look good, I like these narrow corridors and one way shooting holes."
RE: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - Dutch - Jan 19, 2019
(Jan 19, 2019, 05:29 PM)ForceGhost Wrote:(Jan 19, 2019, 05:28 PM)DarkosNL Wrote: Well its just to look cool so its decoration not a defensive fortification.
That's a bit like me building a very clear doom fort and saying "It's just to look good, I like these narrow corridors and one way shooting holes."
We are talking about 1 prop on a little roof that we have not used. (you guys won that raid)
RE: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - Mohammad Albingy - Jan 19, 2019
As far as I have been told in the past you are not allowed to even build the defenses.. regardless if you use them or not. There have been multiple occasions where my base is in building phase and admins have come and told me to remove stuff for similar issues... Also I would like to say that if this base is not classed as a doomfort then half the stuff i build shouldn't be either...
RE: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - Dutch - Jan 19, 2019
TBH you guys are just trying to get me banned for the smallest reasons.
I think there is no rule broken that prop on the foto caused no one any harm so why is it rule breaking?
And last time im gonna say its a [DECORATION] not a defence.
RE: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - Montyfatcat - Jan 19, 2019
-In the clan, we've used the base before-
There isn't even access to the roof, they are impossible to use, and have never BEEN used. The rooftop just looked a bit drab initially. The base was never designed to be purely functional, it was also designed to look cool. The only work decoration-wise, and even if we wanted to use them we couldn't without being able to go up there.
RE: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - Mohammad Albingy - Jan 19, 2019
I built a base on Truenorth that was legitimately just a forest that got deemed not allowed for use as its classed as a doomfort. The trees where just for decoration and just to fill in empty space so apparently u cant use stuff as decoration that could be used as something for doomfort.
RE: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - Shiny - Jan 19, 2019
Post removed, user warned.
RE: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - Mohammad Albingy - Jan 19, 2019
Nitpick (in your opinion) or not Rules are rules
RE: PR -> [L²:RP]I.T.D-DarkosNL - Night - Jan 20, 2019