+- Limelight Forums (https://limelightgaming.net/forums)
+-- Forum: Feedback (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-612.html)
+--- Forum: Suggestions (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-239.html)
+---- Forum: Finished (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-242.html)
+---- Thread: CityRP Automove Staff to AFK (/thread-24020.html)
Pages:
1
2
Automove Staff to AFK - ForceGhost - Dec 31, 2018
Explain your suggestion, in detail: Move Staff to the AFK job when they're AFK.
Explain why the suggestion should be implemented: Prevents staff from hour whoring AFK. Allows people on the server to actually see if staff are AFK or not. Players get moved to AFK after being AFK there's no reason why staff shouldn't.
RE: Automove Staff to AFK - jess - Dec 31, 2018
+support
gosh darn hour whoring >
RE: Automove Staff to AFK - pufitee - Jan 1, 2019
+support
thank u smellyghost very cool
RE: Automove Staff to AFK - Taylor - Jan 1, 2019
+Support
RE: Automove Staff to AFK - StephanGH - Jan 1, 2019
+support
Because @Wesley Lawrence has no clue what the AFK job is
RE: Automove Staff to AFK - Temar - Jan 1, 2019
as long as like me or dev is excluded im fine with it, i often play around with code etc on server, and would be annoying if i kept getting moved while im coding
RE: Automove Staff to AFK - Reebs - Jan 1, 2019
(Jan 1, 2019, 05:02 AM)Temar Wrote: as long as like me or dev is excluded im fine with it, i often play around with code etc on server, and would be annoying if i kept getting moved while im coding
Possibly implement a command for Staff to put in if they're doing so? For example something like /busy? Would auto-reply to PMs with a phrase such as "I'm currently occupied, if this is an emergency please use @, otherwise try again later or contact another staff member.", and move the staff member to a separate section of the scoreboard labeled as "*BUSY*", perhaps?
RE: Automove Staff to AFK - Somali Drug Lord - Jan 1, 2019
+support
RE: Automove Staff to AFK - Nudel - Jan 2, 2019
(Jan 1, 2019, 08:36 AM)Reebs Wrote:(Jan 1, 2019, 05:02 AM)Temar Wrote: as long as like me or dev is excluded im fine with it, i often play around with code etc on server, and would be annoying if i kept getting moved while im coding
Possibly implement a command for Staff to put in if they're doing so? For example something like /busy? Would auto-reply to PMs with a phrase such as "I'm currently occupied, if this is an emergency please use @, otherwise try again later or contact another staff member.", and move the staff member to a separate section of the scoreboard labeled as "*BUSY*", perhaps?
How about we call the command /farmhourswhilstafk?
OT: +support | -support for any kind of command.
RE: Automove Staff to AFK - Reebs - Jan 2, 2019
(Jan 2, 2019, 01:30 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote:(Jan 1, 2019, 08:36 AM)Reebs Wrote:(Jan 1, 2019, 05:02 AM)Temar Wrote: as long as like me or dev is excluded im fine with it, i often play around with code etc on server, and would be annoying if i kept getting moved while im coding
Possibly implement a command for Staff to put in if they're doing so? For example something like /busy? Would auto-reply to PMs with a phrase such as "I'm currently occupied, if this is an emergency please use @, otherwise try again later or contact another staff member.", and move the staff member to a separate section of the scoreboard labeled as "*BUSY*", perhaps?
How about we call the command /farmhourswhilstafk?
OT: +support | -support for any kind of command.
Obviously, abusing the command should lead to disciplinary action, though I don't forsee that being an issue with any current member of staff.
RE: Automove Staff to AFK - Alphaverse - Jan 3, 2019
+Support
RE: Automove Staff to AFK - Oneshott - Jan 4, 2019
I don't see an issue with the suggestion +support.
I have not seen staff purposely "Hour whore" though.
Automove Staff to AFK - Temar - Jan 4, 2019
Pushing for Staff Review.
#type:[review]
RE: Automove Staff to AFK - Ollie630 - Jan 4, 2019
+Support
RE: Automove Staff to AFK - Limelight Gaming - Jan 4, 2019
Pushing for Staff Review.
#type:[review]