Limelight Forums
PR -> Elfie - Printable Version

+- Limelight Forums (https://limelightgaming.net/forums)
+-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-198.html)
+--- Forum: Player Reports (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-209.html)
+---- Forum: Approved (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-213.html)
+---- Thread: PR -> Elfie (/thread-21299.html)



PR -> Elfie - Cochise - Jun 2, 2018




RE: PR -> Elfie - Dewis Leall - Jun 2, 2018

I was already in a goverment position of power and had witnessed the man use deadly force whilst in said power. I then became president and acted on this after previsoly a few seconds before talking to the president (of who I was acting as advisor to) about his demotion however the president chose this point to DC so I came into power and acted in the same way I had advised and then continued to RP out my goverment. I did not switch JUST to abuse the power as president I simply acted upon something I had previosly witnessed not 30 seconds before. I did not switch after being demoted to get revenge I switched because I was waiting to be promoted from Advisor to President (In an RP sense) so when I did so I acted like I had said to do orignally. I saw the abuse whilst in a position of power and acted on it whilst in power.


RE: PR -> Elfie - Taylor - Jun 2, 2018




RE: PR -> Elfie - Dewis Leall - Jun 2, 2018

"RyanF" You did not tell the whole story. You made it sound like I just switched to demote it and then switched back.


RE: PR -> Elfie - Taylor - Jun 2, 2018

(Jun 2, 2018, 11:41 PM)OnlineSyco Wrote: "RyanF" You did not tell the whole story. You made it sound like I just switched to demote it and then switched back.

No I didn't, if I wanted it to sound like that I wouldve specified you then switched back.


RE: PR -> Elfie - Dewis Leall - Jun 2, 2018

If you had used my whole explanation im sure the outcome would have bene different


RE: PR -> Elfie - Jeff Ford - Jun 3, 2018

=Secret Service at the time, involved=

At the time, the government was undergoing reform with regards to martial law due to crime so syco was a military general, a respective and high up position. yada yada. Syco witnessed the suspected officer abuse and asked the president he deserves a demotion. At this point, the president had left, so syco had then taken the President slot because he wanted to be president (duh). The accused officer was demoted because elfie had the power too while roleplaying as an actual martial law leader.

Long story short, my perspective it seemed elfie took advantage of the previous president leaving and the officer happened  to have been accused and demoted by elfie as he had taken the position intending to roleplay as an actual politican. I completely understand that from the accused perspective it looked like he powergamed but from my perspective it was just because syco had taken the presidents position intending to take his role seriously.

My perspective it seems syco is not in the wrong, although it looks like it.


RE: PR -> Elfie - Doctor Internet - Jun 3, 2018




RE: PR -> Elfie - 26' - Jun 3, 2018

My input is it's straight up power gaming no question about it. It's fairly close to the situation doc had mentioned above, my cause for concern in your first line of your response spills the beans a bit.


 "I was already in a government position of power and had witnessed the man use deadly force whilst in said power. I then became president and acted on this"

If you were Desk Security but had a job title "General" Does not give you the power to demote. Sure advise the president but that's about it, it's failRP to switch to President and demote him. I see you also said "i didn't just switch to president to demote then switch back" it doesn't matter if you already demoted him. 

Anyway, that's my opinion. Smile 


RE: PR -> Elfie - Dewis Leall - Jun 3, 2018

He wasnt using the force on me doctor he used it on a civiian in front of all of us (the 2 ss, me and the president)


RE: PR -> Elfie - Doctor Internet - Jun 4, 2018

Player Report Approved.

Please see prior notes. Warning issued.