Buff Mclaren - Printable Version +- Limelight Forums (https://limelightgaming.net/forums) +-- Forum: Feedback (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-612.html) +--- Forum: Suggestions (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-239.html) +---- Forum: Finished (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-242.html) +---- Thread: Buff Mclaren (/thread-17634.html) |
Buff Mclaren - Tom* - Oct 15, 2017 Suggestion Type: In-Game Explain your suggestion, in detail: Buff the speed of the mclaren because for 2 million dollars it is stupidly slow. Other cars such as the sting ray and mustang are faster for 10% of the price Explain why the suggestion should be implemented: The car at the moment is so under powered RE: Buff Mclaren - Vimpto - Oct 16, 2017 There is a suggestion about this in staff review Buff Mclaren - Doctor Internet - Oct 26, 2017 Due to a high level of community support, this suggestion has been moved to the Popular section. RE: Buff Mclaren - Nebula - Oct 26, 2017 -support Money ≠ Speed. RE: Buff Mclaren - ICEKILLER_99 - Oct 27, 2017 (Oct 26, 2017, 01:11 PM)Nebula Wrote: -support so what does money equal then? +support pls buff Buff Mclaren - Doctor Internet - Nov 1, 2017 Pushing for Staff Review. #type:[review] RE: Buff Mclaren - Vadar - Nov 7, 2017 +Support 70MPH for a 2Million $$ car is pretty unrealistic. RE: Buff Mclaren - Nebula - Nov 7, 2017 (Oct 27, 2017, 09:39 AM)ICEKILLER_99 Wrote:(Oct 26, 2017, 01:11 PM)Nebula Wrote: -support Luxury ? Duh. RE: Buff Mclaren - Tom* - Nov 26, 2017 (Nov 7, 2017, 01:50 PM)Vadar Wrote: +Support Also a 160k Mustang im pretty sure is faster RE: Buff Mclaren - The Original bob - Nov 29, 2017 Huge +Support. It is kind of unrealistic how the P1's top speed is almost 70 mph. I also think that they should fix the handling of the car since it's really hard to drive at the moment and it always spins out. Also, the Ford Victoria almost has the same speed, doesn't it? Buff Mclaren - Doctor Internet - Dec 26, 2017 Approved. RE: Buff Mclaren - Doctor Internet - Dec 19, 2018 Completed in Revisions 9214, 9217, 9220 through 9222. |