Limelight Forums
Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - Printable Version

+- Limelight Forums (https://limelightgaming.net/forums)
+-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-198.html)
+--- Forum: Player Reports (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-209.html)
+---- Forum: Denied (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-214.html)
+---- Thread: Player report on ICEKILLER_99 (/thread-17057.html)

Pages: 1 2


Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - Project - Sep 1, 2017

Name of Player: ICEKILLER_99

SteamID: STEAM_0:1:87262869

Server: Event Server

Time: (In UTC+0) 8pm I believe

Summary: RDM x2,  Metagaming.
He shot @Doctor Internet(who posed no threat to him) and @"ForceGhost"(Who was under NLR and was running away to avoid further conflict) without a reason and admitted to metagaming.

Evidence:
His own evidence showing him RDMing two people
https://plays.tv/video/59a92e5908dbe43610/toxic-lying

Himself admitting to breaking both rules.
https://limelightgaming.net/forums/thread-17040-post-188307.html#pid188307


- Limelight Gaming - Sep 1, 2017

Thank you for your player-report, Project.

It will take a while for it to be reviewed by our staff-members.
Meanwhile, the accused player and witnesses may reply to this report.



RE: Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - ICEKILLER_99 - Sep 1, 2017

First of all I shot Doctor internet because he looked like a cop.I checked tab to make SURE he was not a medic.Then I shot forceghost because he did not have his hands up which he should have had if he died.


RE: Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - Project - Sep 1, 2017

(Sep 1, 2017, 02:27 PM)ICEKILLER_99 Wrote: First of all I shot Doctor internet because he looked like a cop.
He may have looked like one but that doesnt mean you can shoot him, it was obvious he didnt have firearms after you were looking at him for a few seconds.

I checked tab to make SURE he was not a medic.
Metagaming does not grand you an RP reason to kill someone.

Then I shot forceghost because he did not have his hands up which he should have had if he died.
Again, at that point you had killed 3 SWAT if I am not mistaken, myself included, you saw he had no firearms in his hands and made 0 attempts to shoot you yet you still shot him as he was just trying to get off his NLR zone.



RE: Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - ICEKILLER_99 - Sep 1, 2017

Yes I did kill 3 swat and there was still one left.I don't get your point here.

I really don't see how its rdm,it was a fucking mistake,get over it.


RE: Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - Project - Sep 1, 2017

(Sep 1, 2017, 02:37 PM)ICEKILLER_99 Wrote: Yes I did kill 3 swat and there was still one left.I don't get your point here.

I really don't see how its rdm,it was a fucking mistake,get over it.
You killed two people without them posing a threat to you or anyone else, you were not supposed to be shooting anyone at the first place. Which is RDM.


RE: Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - ICEKILLER_99 - Sep 1, 2017

(Sep 1, 2017, 02:44 PM)Project Wrote:
(Sep 1, 2017, 02:37 PM)ICEKILLER_99 Wrote: Yes I did kill 3 swat and there was still one left.I don't get your point here.

I really don't see how its rdm,it was a fucking mistake,get over it.
You killed two people without them posing a threat to you or anyone else, you were not supposed to be shooting anyone at the first place. Which is RDM.

Nightmare said ''you can shoot whenever you think you can kill them''.He was a SWAT officer at a plane takeover,what do you expect him to get?A cake?As I said I did not know doctor internet was a traffic controller and I shot him by mistake.


RE: Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - ForceGhost - Sep 1, 2017

To me, when you shot at me, I was in the middle of negotiations and about to finish the transfer of the last hostage. I can't see a valid RP reason for doing so as everything was going the way you guys wanted.


RE: Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - ICEKILLER_99 - Sep 1, 2017

As I said I was instructed to shoot you by @"Nightmare".


RE: Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - Project - Sep 1, 2017

I doubt he instructed you to kill civs as that would be breaking the hostage rules.


RE: Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - ICEKILLER_99 - Sep 1, 2017

I shot one traffic controller by ACCIDENT.You can stop bringing that up because I've already explained 2 times


RE: Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - Project - Sep 1, 2017

(Sep 1, 2017, 03:35 PM)ICEKILLER_99 Wrote: I shot one traffic controller by ACCIDENT.You can stop bringing that up because I've already explained 2 times
How is it an accident to aim your scope 3-4 times into the head of an unarmed man for over 4 seconds then execute him? Also the second piece of evidence shows that you agree with the fact that you RDMed someone and metagamed before doing so. Has anything changed since then?


RE: Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - ICEKILLER_99 - Sep 1, 2017

Accident as in I did not know he was a traffic controller.Me agreeing to breaking the rules is a joke if you didn't catch that by now.


RE: Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - Project - Sep 1, 2017

Just to clarify, after I discussed with @Nightmare for a bit, he did confirm he gave all of you a command to shoot us(SWAT) after we moved two of our units closer to you. I don't understand why you shot someone who was obviously unarmed and not in a SWAT uniform. I can understand that you didn't know that @"ForceGhost" was under NLR. The case still stands as you admitted metagaming before killing @Doctor Internet and the fact you had no RP reason for that kill.


RE: Player report on ICEKILLER_99 - ICEKILLER_99 - Sep 1, 2017

(Sep 1, 2017, 05:01 PM)Project Wrote: Just to clarify, after I discussed with @Nightmare for a bit, he did confirm he gave all of you a command to shoot us(SWAT) after we moved two of our units closer to you. I don't understand why you shot someone who was obviously unarmed and not in a SWAT uniform. I can understand that you didn't know that @"ForceGhost" was under NLR. The case still stands as you admitted metagaming before killing @Doctor Internet and the fact you had no RP reason for that kill.

Obviously unarmed with a vest and helmet on?Really?I don't get how that's obvious