(Oct 7, 2017, 06:56 PM)Faustin Wrote:

(Oct 7, 2017, 06:37 PM)Rocket Wrote: oh of course there will always be loyal and good players that stick around but I'm just talking about most and not all. Its not always going to happen its just more likely to happen.

What about you guys being more transparent with how people get Mod or how people would go about putting themselves out there to get it?

Why don't you guys accept recommendations from the playerbase? look who is popular amongst the players, for example @Project, then once a person has x amount of players recommending them or once a staff member suggests them in the admin forums start reviewing them for a moderator role?

(Oct 8, 2017, 06:25 PM)Blazing Wrote:

(Oct 7, 2017, 06:56 PM)Faustin Wrote:

(Oct 7, 2017, 06:37 PM)Rocket Wrote: oh of course there will always be loyal and good players that stick around but I'm just talking about most and not all. Its not always going to happen its just more likely to happen.

What about you guys being more transparent with how people get Mod or how people would go about putting themselves out there to get it?

Why don't you guys accept recommendations from the playerbase? look who is popular amongst the players, for example @Project, then once a person has x amount of players recommending them or once a staff member suggests them in the admin forums start reviewing them for a moderator role?

It would be even harder for the newly recruited moderator to ban the very same people who nominated them for a staff role.

(Oct 8, 2017, 06:32 PM)Rocket Wrote: Somehow this @George kid seem to always get all the likes...

(Oct 8, 2017, 06:36 PM)Faustin Wrote:

(Oct 8, 2017, 06:25 PM)Blazing Wrote:

(Oct 7, 2017, 06:56 PM)Faustin Wrote:

(Oct 7, 2017, 06:37 PM)Rocket Wrote: oh of course there will always be loyal and good players that stick around but I'm just talking about most and not all. Its not always going to happen its just more likely to happen.

What about you guys being more transparent with how people get Mod or how people would go about putting themselves out there to get it?

Why don't you guys accept recommendations from the playerbase? look who is popular amongst the players, for example @Project, then once a person has x amount of players recommending them or once a staff member suggests them in the admin forums start reviewing them for a moderator role?

It would be even harder for the newly recruited moderator to ban the very same people who nominated them for a staff role.

Think about staff that were Teachers before staff, would it have been hard for them to punish the people that +Supported their application?

(Oct 7, 2017, 11:06 PM)George Wrote: Just demote that George guy

(Oct 8, 2017, 05:49 PM)Invent Wrote: i'd say promote big man nightmare and hire big man moderator you know?

(Oct 8, 2017, 07:35 PM)Blazing Wrote:

(Oct 8, 2017, 06:36 PM)Faustin Wrote:

(Oct 8, 2017, 06:25 PM)Blazing Wrote:

(Oct 7, 2017, 06:56 PM)Faustin Wrote:

(Oct 7, 2017, 06:37 PM)Rocket Wrote: oh of course there will always be loyal and good players that stick around but I'm just talking about most and not all. Its not always going to happen its just more likely to happen.

What about you guys being more transparent with how people get Mod or how people would go about putting themselves out there to get it?

Why don't you guys accept recommendations from the playerbase? look who is popular amongst the players, for example @Project, then once a person has x amount of players recommending them or once a staff member suggests them in the admin forums start reviewing them for a moderator role?

It would be even harder for the newly recruited moderator to ban the very same people who nominated them for a staff role.

Think about staff that were Teachers before staff, would it have been hard for them to punish the people that +Supported their application?

Not really, or if so then not to the same extent at all. There's usually quite a while before somebody becomes a moderator from a teacher role, and even if it's a short interval, it's a change of position which wasn't directly caused by the support for their teacher application.

(Oct 8, 2017, 08:21 PM)Faustin Wrote:

(Oct 8, 2017, 07:35 PM)Blazing Wrote:

(Oct 8, 2017, 06:36 PM)Faustin Wrote:

(Oct 8, 2017, 06:25 PM)Blazing Wrote:

(Oct 7, 2017, 06:56 PM)Faustin Wrote: What about you guys being more transparent with how people get Mod or how people would go about putting themselves out there to get it?

Why don't you guys accept recommendations from the playerbase? look who is popular amongst the players, for example @Project, then once a person has x amount of players recommending them or once a staff member suggests them in the admin forums start reviewing them for a moderator role?

It would be even harder for the newly recruited moderator to ban the very same people who nominated them for a staff role.

Think about staff that were Teachers before staff, would it have been hard for them to punish the people that +Supported their application?

Not really, or if so then not to the same extent at all. There's usually quite a while before somebody becomes a moderator from a teacher role, and even if it's a short interval, it's a change of position which wasn't directly caused by the support for their teacher application.

On that logic if I supported someone for Moderator they may be hesitant to ban me, but once they become Admin and an interval has passed that goes away?

(Oct 8, 2017, 08:25 PM)Blazing Wrote:

(Oct 8, 2017, 08:21 PM)Faustin Wrote:

(Oct 8, 2017, 07:35 PM)Blazing Wrote:

(Oct 8, 2017, 06:36 PM)Faustin Wrote:

(Oct 8, 2017, 06:25 PM)Blazing Wrote: It would be even harder for the newly recruited moderator to ban the very same people who nominated them for a staff role.

Think about staff that were Teachers before staff, would it have been hard for them to punish the people that +Supported their application?

Not really, or if so then not to the same extent at all. There's usually quite a while before somebody becomes a moderator from a teacher role, and even if it's a short interval, it's a change of position which wasn't directly caused by the support for their teacher application.

On that logic if I supported someone for Moderator they may be hesitant to ban me, but once they become Admin and an interval has passed that goes away?

Moderators and administrators are both members of staff, whilst teachers aren't. There's a big difference.

(Oct 8, 2017, 08:30 PM)Faustin Wrote:

(Oct 8, 2017, 08:25 PM)Blazing Wrote:

(Oct 8, 2017, 08:21 PM)Faustin Wrote:

(Oct 8, 2017, 07:35 PM)Blazing Wrote:

(Oct 8, 2017, 06:36 PM)Faustin Wrote: Think about staff that were Teachers before staff, would it have been hard for them to punish the people that +Supported their application?

Not really, or if so then not to the same extent at all. There's usually quite a while before somebody becomes a moderator from a teacher role, and even if it's a short interval, it's a change of position which wasn't directly caused by the support for their teacher application.

On that logic if I supported someone for Moderator they may be hesitant to ban me, but once they become Admin and an interval has passed that goes away?

Moderators and administrators are both members of staff, whilst teachers aren't. There's a big difference.

The principle of supporting someone in order to obtain a rank is still there.

(Oct 13, 2017, 07:29 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: Some guy just prop-pushed half of the server to death.

It's prime-time on friday evening and there's not a single staff member online out of one which is afk and farming hours. How comes???

(Oct 13, 2017, 07:58 PM)Vatipää Wrote:

(Oct 13, 2017, 07:29 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: Some guy just prop-pushed half of the server to death.

It's prime-time on friday evening and there's not a single staff member online out of one which is afk and farming hours. How comes???

Where is the PR