+- Limelight Forums (https://limelightgaming.net/forums)
+-- Forum: Feedback (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-612.html)
+--- Forum: Community Input (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-247.html)
+--- Thread: [Feedback] Evocity v17x (/thread-24131.html)
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - Taylor - Jan 18, 2019
(Jan 18, 2019, 06:51 PM)Doctor Internet Wrote:(Jan 18, 2019, 05:29 PM)Faustin Wrote:(Jan 18, 2019, 05:27 PM)BlackDog Wrote: V4B1 isnt an option, thus I wont suggest it
Why not suggest to have it added? Or another map?
![[Image: 27b8714e8ce7419184664e75ce484f61.png]](https://i.gyazo.com/27b8714e8ce7419184664e75ce484f61.png)
Quote:Or another map?
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - Project - Jan 18, 2019
(Jan 18, 2019, 07:03 PM)Lord Octagon Wrote:(Jan 18, 2019, 06:51 PM)Doctor Internet Wrote:(Jan 18, 2019, 05:29 PM)Faustin Wrote: Why not suggest to have it added? Or another map?
#BRINGBACKV4B1
![[Image: rtY5e3R.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/rtY5e3R.jpg)
1) This is not the place to ask for another map to be tested.
2) If you have proof that the map won't be causing issues like it has done in the past, bring it forward in a suggestion thread.
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - Taylor - Jan 18, 2019
(Jan 18, 2019, 08:10 PM)Project Wrote:(Jan 18, 2019, 07:03 PM)Lord Octagon Wrote:(Jan 18, 2019, 06:51 PM)Doctor Internet Wrote:
#BRINGBACKV4B1
1) This is not the place to ask for another map to be tested.
2) If you have proof that the map won't be causing issues like it has done in the past, bring it forward in a suggestion thread.
My dear friend,
It appears that in your testimony of the perspective that you have on the current scenario, that I have found a contradiction between of our standpoints regarding the quality of the subject in question. Therefore, it is with modesty that I must announce that through a logical decution that this contradiction should not and thereby must not exist, the perspective that you have chosen to stand by is deemed invalid.
Thanks.
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - BlackDog - Jan 18, 2019
In the end we can all agree, 17x is terrible
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - Tom* - Jan 18, 2019
(Jan 18, 2019, 10:27 PM)BlackDog Wrote: In the end we can all agree, 17x is terrible
the ambient noises outside of the city have been proven to give autism
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - Zaidplays - Jan 18, 2019
(Jan 18, 2019, 10:30 PM)Tom_ Wrote: the ambient noises outside of the city have been proven to give autism
Hahahah Facts.
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - Lord Octagon - Jan 20, 2019
The best one of all the options tbh. If we can't have v4b1 (don't see why not), then this will map will do.
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - Welker - Jan 20, 2019
v17x is awful. In all fairness I have no idea what these claims of performance issues stemming from v4b1 are when compared to True North. While some performance issues can be felt from the Nexus I feel the community should be able to decide whether that is a sacrifice they wish to make. There's no more performance implications than True North
During the serious RP event hosted on v4b1 I had good frames and there was a tonne of props strewn over the entire map, I found it to be an excellent map for RP.
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - BlackDog - Jan 20, 2019
The horror ends soon, 2 days remain
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - IsThisaNewFLRP? - Jan 20, 2019
This map is just.... poorly made. I don't see a reason to see why make the switch to here if there's no chance of a proper Hospital RP if there's oh I dunno? another Industrial Zone from v2d which is what 25% of the map. I also don't see a mayor RP potential here for a number of reason I will refrain from listing as I may go deep and deeper but overall, it's just a total mess. Yuck, ew, it makes me throw up. Switch to Truenorth please.
Also, the ambient sounds make the map look like if it was in a neighboring zone that's in a fucking civil war, for Christ sake. Clearly the author didn't think of anything to be honest really.
Here is it to end my rant, have a good one.
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - Blazing - Jan 20, 2019
I don't see much reason why we shouldn't at least try v4b1 again for a week. Performance didn't seem to be horrible compared to v17x, which is currently being trialled, and Fearless don't seem to have too many issues either.
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - Lord Octagon - Jan 20, 2019
(Jan 20, 2019, 12:43 PM)Blazing Wrote: I don't see much reason why we shouldn't at least try v4b1 again for a week. Performance didn't seem to be horrible compared to v17x, which is currently being trialled, and Fearless don't seem to have too many issues either.
I don't know what people are smoking when they say 'performance issues'. GMOD itself is one big 'performance issue'.
#TEAMV4B1
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - Dan - Jan 20, 2019
What’s wrong with chaos city
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - Noble - Jan 20, 2019
If you're going to keep suggesting v4b1 at least learn more about what the problem is with the map: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_leak
I'm assuming the memory leak gets to the point the server doesn't have enough to function and just crashes but an active Dev would have to confirm if that's what the testing showed.
RE: [Feedback] Evocity v17x - Lord Octagon - Jan 20, 2019
(Jan 20, 2019, 03:04 PM)Dan Wrote: What’s wrong with chaos city
What's wrong with flatgrass