![]() |
Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - Printable Version +- Limelight Forums (https://limelightgaming.net/forums) +-- Forum: Feedback (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-612.html) +--- Forum: Suggestions (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-239.html) +---- Forum: Finished (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-242.html) +---- Thread: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan (/thread-15353.html) |
RE: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - Karpooo - May 6, 2017 - Support RE: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - yutgjctguc - May 6, 2017 +Support for limiting it to fire chief and 1 gov rep RE: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - Nebula - May 6, 2017 (May 6, 2017, 07:27 PM)Karpooo Wrote: - Support Might explain a reason ? RE: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - Nebula - May 31, 2017 Bumpp RE: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - Rizion - May 31, 2017 +Support, limit it to 2 Gov-REP... RE: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - Nebula - May 31, 2017 (May 6, 2017, 05:49 PM)Octave Wrote: As Rock also pointed out, i'm against restrictions too (Especially REPs), though, i can see why it would be more appropriate setting lots of the REP restrictions to time restrictions.The restriction was here to prevent that only suburans are Driving around. And that has happend and still happens. They go FD chief but no other Fire Fighter joins in so they decide to use the suburan. The Fire Engine became a much rarer sight RE: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - Night - May 31, 2017 -support. I agree that only suburbans are seen around now, but there's better ways to approach this than an REP restriction in my eyes. RE: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - Nebula - May 31, 2017 (May 31, 2017, 02:51 PM)Nightmare Wrote: -support. It was already restricted and nobody said anything against that. But now its not and many people are against the restriction.. I just dont get it. RE: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - Soviethooves - May 31, 2017 Not to mention we barely have REP rewards. Having the job a REP required job would be another reward to get to. RE: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - Delex - May 31, 2017 What a bullshit. Keep it restricted to the job Firechief and that's it.... simple.. Why lock everything down -1 Also you are currently pointing out a structural problem: Firefighter job is lack of content and boring. People get to play chief to drive a suburban because the truck is shit. Don't use REP as an avoidance to solve up your "missing" firetruck. Instead fix the firetruck, the job itself and get people more attracted to it to play like cops job. RE: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - SirApex - May 31, 2017 -Support RE: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - Nebula - Jun 1, 2017 (May 31, 2017, 08:22 PM)Galaxy Wrote: What a bullshit. Keep it restricted to the job Firechief and that's it.... simple..Why do i habe to repeat myself. The restriction was there to avoid that only Suburans are used. And since normal firefighters are rare, because they do not want to be under the command of somebody who doesn't know what he's doing. RE: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - Woody Mac - Jun 26, 2017 Neutral RE: Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - Doctor Internet - Aug 12, 2017 Due to middling support for this suggestion, has been moved to the Voting section for a final community vote. Voting on this suggestion will last for a week. PLEASE NOTE: Due to the addition of the Fire Chief role, this suggestion would essentially add a REP lock to the Fire Chief job. Pushing for Staff Review. Bring back REP Restriction to FD Suburan - Doctor Internet - Nov 11, 2017 Approved. |