(Nov 10, 2016, 05:22 AM)Noble Wrote: Oh yes, America is in excellent hands.



I can ignore most of the dumb shit Trump comes up with but his "beliefs" (to put it lightly) in science are what could really screw the US up. He's talked of

Limelight - Link watcher

You're about to enter the following site: Limelight - Link watcher You're about to enter the following site: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/donald-trump-epa-dept-of-education Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/donald-trump-epa-dept-of-education Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.

cutting the Environmental Protection Agency (who he chose Myron Ebell to lead in the transition,

Limelight - Link watcher

You're about to enter the following site: Limelight - Link watcher You're about to enter the following site: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trump-picks-top-climate-skeptic-to-lead-epa-transition/ Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trump-picks-top-climate-skeptic-to-lead-epa-transition/ Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.

a known climate skeptic), scrapping major

Limelight - Link watcher

You're about to enter the following site: Limelight - Link watcher You're about to enter the following site: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-would-repeal-clean-power-plan-other-big-epa-regs/article/2601931 Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-would-repeal-clean-power-plan-other-big-epa-regs/article/2601931 Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.

US regulations on CO2 output such as the Clean Power Plan, and

Limelight - Link watcher

You're about to enter the following site: Limelight - Link watcher You're about to enter the following site: https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36401174 Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36401174 Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.

"cancel" the Paris Climate Deal (he does have to wait 4 years to officially leave it, but could simply ignore the restrictions).

Here's the best part, he can't do it alone because he'll need the House and Senate to go alone with it. But they are now lead by a Republican majority who, ~56%, believe climate change isn't real or are skeptical.

Limelight - Link watcher

You're about to enter the following site: Limelight - Link watcher You're about to enter the following site: https://thinkprogress.org/the-anti-science-climate-denier-caucus-732ec3a2a4d4#.gvl8n32pl Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy. https://thinkprogress.org/the-anti-science-climate-denier-caucus-732ec3a2a4d4#.gvl8n32pl Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.

Here's a list of 170 Republicans of the 114th congress (current congress) who fall in this category.

And just for kicks, "...97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities." (

Limelight - Link watcher

You're about to enter the following site: https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/)

Didn't vote for either of these cucks, but it'll be interesting to see how this one turns out.

(Nov 10, 2016, 12:47 AM)jarz Wrote:

(Nov 10, 2016, 12:32 AM)George Wrote:

(Nov 9, 2016, 10:04 PM)GRiiM Wrote:

(Nov 9, 2016, 09:18 PM)George Wrote:

(Nov 9, 2016, 08:14 PM)GRiiM Wrote: Should be some very interesting years to come, USA and the UK will set a shining example of what true freedom is.

Oh and it's nice to see that Clinton supporters are handling their loss so maturely...

Yeah, I agree that Hillary supporters aren't handling defeat well but do you honestly think Republicans would be acting any differently if it was the other way around?

Google isn't bringing up and news reports of Republicans rioting in 2008 or 2012, could something though if you'd like to try.

No, just the fact that Donald Trump claimed that the system was rigged so if Hillary had won, I'm sure many Republicans would think that it was true.

Except it was rigged, and we still won. Hillary should have done a better job.

Limelight - Link watcher

You're about to enter the following site: https://twitter.com/PhillyGOP/status/796044376216576000 Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.

https://twitter.com/PhillyGOP/status/796044376216576000

Limelight - Link watcher

You're about to enter the following site: https://twitter.com/TEN_GOP/status/796053302693822465 Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.

https://twitter.com/TEN_GOP/status/796053302693822465

(Nov 9, 2016, 10:16 AM)Safira Wrote: I'm not mad necessarily that he got elected. Who knows? He could be decent.
No, what I'm mad about is that, despite the derogatory, sexist, racist remarks and lies he's made, American people voted for him. I know many voted because of his economics or other issues, but still voted for a man despite all these things. To me, that says a lot about people - what they're willing to condone.

Second of all, republican senate and house. That means what Obama has done in the name of liberty will probably go backwards, imo. Gay marriage could be abolished. People might refuse service if it conflicts with their beliefs. Republicans are pro-life, iirc. So state intervention in something very, very personal is gonna start happening.

Oh, and Trump's not a believer in Global Warming, wanting out of the Paris conference. So yay that.

(Nov 10, 2016, 12:04 PM)Adam James Wrote:

(Nov 9, 2016, 10:16 AM)Safira Wrote: -Snip-

inb4 "i dont want that trigger happy man having our nuclear codes"
if you honestly think that he can use the nukes at his will, you are stupid.
The U.N. would never approve of a nuclear strike. Actually, it's illegal to use nuclear weapons unless in self-defense under the UN Charter.

(Nov 10, 2016, 12:04 PM)Adam James Wrote: You do know Trump cannot reverse gay marriage right?
The Supreme Court ruled it legal. The Supreme Court is the highest authority  there is.
You cannot reverse it; unless the Supreme Court does it themselves.

(Nov 10, 2016, 03:34 PM)Hungames Wrote:

(Nov 10, 2016, 12:04 PM)Adam James Wrote:

(Nov 9, 2016, 10:16 AM)Safira Wrote: -Snip-

inb4 "i dont want that trigger happy man having our nuclear codes"
if you honestly think that he can use the nukes at his will, you are stupid.
The U.N. would never approve of a nuclear strike. Actually, it's illegal to use nuclear weapons unless in self-defense under the UN Charter.

The UN doesn't have authority over the American minuteman nukes. The president has his set of codes, along with another known by other high ranking officials such as SecDef. His order can be denied and investigated internally. Exposing an attempted nuclear attack could lead to horrible consequences such as Russia retaliating or other countries with nuclear weapons.

(Nov 13, 2016, 12:31 AM)George Wrote: -snip-

Don't think Donald can really say much about the protesters when he LITERALLY asked for Republicans to revolt after Obama won.

(Nov 13, 2016, 12:31 AM)George Wrote:

Don't think Donald can really say much about the protesters when he LITERALLY asked for Republicans to revolt after Obama won.