+- Limelight Forums (https://limelightgaming.net/forums)
+-- Forum: Feedback (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-612.html)
+--- Forum: Community Input (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-247.html)
+--- Thread: Staff to community Q & A (/thread-15782.html)
RE: Staff to community Q & A - Soviethooves - Jan 8, 2018
(Dec 5, 2017, 08:55 PM)ICEKILLER_99 Wrote: why does it take months for RR's to be review like seriously what takes you so long
Didn't realized this was answered, sorry.
It's the same reason we see an inactivity in staff IG. It's mostly real life taking over their time. That and some require internal investigations we don't see.
Now of course we can say "jut get rid of them", but now that I've seen both sides, they have a point to be hesitant about removing key staff members. Although they're inactive, who's gonna replace them? To be frank, LL is not the most peaceful place to play. Lots of people (including myself) can be toxic, mingey, and other negative behaviors that staff don't want to see.
RE: Staff to community Q & A - Night - Jan 8, 2018
(Jan 8, 2018, 03:19 AM)Gungranny Wrote:(Dec 5, 2017, 08:55 PM)ICEKILLER_99 Wrote: why does it take months for RR's to be review like seriously what takes you so long
Didn't realized this was answered, sorry.
It's the same reason we see an inactivity in staff IG. It's mostly real life taking over their time. That and some require internal investigations we don't see.
Now of course we can say "jut get rid of them", but now that I've seen both sides, they have a point to be hesitant about removing key staff members. Although they're inactive, who's gonna replace them? To be frank, LL is not the most peaceful place to play. Lots of people (including myself) can be toxic, mingey, and other negative behaviors that staff don't want to see.
Also keeping in mind I'm pretty much the only one that looks at them now.
RE: Staff to community Q & A - Enzyme - Jan 8, 2018
RE: Staff to community Q & A - Welker - Jan 8, 2018
RE: Staff to community Q & A - Enzyme - Jan 8, 2018
RE: Staff to community Q & A - Tails - Jan 8, 2018
(Jan 8, 2018, 08:03 PM)Enzyme Wrote: -well structured admin response-
why do you keep putting "ought" in quotation marks what technique is that and how does it impact the rest of your paragraph.
RE: Staff to community Q & A - Enzyme - Jan 8, 2018
You ought to make sentences which doesn't make sense sometime to hopefully get the message through. I merely thought that ought to do the trick.
RE: Staff to community Q & A - Tails - Jan 8, 2018
(Jan 8, 2018, 08:16 PM)Enzyme Wrote: You ought to make sentences which doesn't make sense sometime to hopefully get the message through. I merely thought that ought to do the trick.
Yea I guess that makes sense. Early bird gets the worm and all
RE: Staff to community Q & A - ForceGhost - Mar 31, 2018
Can we get clarification on using lethal force when being fired upon. As far as I was aware it's perfectly fine to return fire if you're being shot at.
RE: Staff to community Q & A - Taylor - Mar 31, 2018
(Mar 31, 2018, 04:56 PM)ForceGhost Wrote: Can we get clarification on using lethal force when being fired upon. As far as I was aware it's perfectly fine to return fire if you're being shot at.
I'm fairly certain that's common sense, surely if you're being shot at and you have the means to defend yourself failing to do so would be an infringement of FearRP? Unless you dashed of course.
RE: Staff to community Q & A - ForceGhost - Mar 31, 2018
(Mar 31, 2018, 05:00 PM)Faustin Wrote:(Mar 31, 2018, 04:56 PM)ForceGhost Wrote: Can we get clarification on using lethal force when being fired upon. As far as I was aware it's perfectly fine to return fire if you're being shot at.
I'm fairly certain that's common sense, surely if you're being shot at and you have the means to defend yourself failing to do so would be an infringement of FearRP? Unless you dashed of course.
I thought so too but on a recent PR:
Overlewd Wrote:Attempting to use nonlethal means first and then switching to lethal right away because you were being shot at is not an excuse in the given situtation
RE: Staff to community Q & A - Doctor Internet - Mar 31, 2018
RE: Staff to community Q & A - Vauld - Mar 31, 2018
Why not ^ people so crazy stuff like that all the time. They shoot at each other for stupid stuff constantly in areas in America.
Why not just deal with it IC, if you use a dumb amount of force you’re arrested.
RE: Staff to community Q & A - Soviethooves - Mar 31, 2018
From my experience, you can use relative lethal force to defend yourself, but if you put yourself into the situation that gives the other party a reason to kill you, it can be considered baiting. Then again it's all circumstantial. If you are breaking into a bank, it seems appropriate to fire on police if they don't meet your demands. In other cases if you have an objective to escape from someone, but stay to fight when they are no longer a threat, that is seen as over use of force.
RE: Staff to community Q & A - Soviethooves - Mar 31, 2018
(Mar 31, 2018, 05:16 PM)Vauld Wrote: Why not ^ people so crazy stuff like that all the time. They shoot at each other for stupid stuff constantly in areas in America.
Why not just deal with it IC, if you use a dumb amount of force you’re arrested.
With that logic we might as well remove most player encounter based rules. There is a difference from real life and the game mode. The GM is meant to be set a certain way. This is done by keeping players in check with rules so people have to at the least act like it's real life instead of a video game. Something that the GM is trying to replicate. Without rules about RDM, Fearp, etc. it would turn into an all out war between people 24/7. Although Aggro RP is almost everywhere in the server already, it's nice to see SOME of those RP's are actual roleplays with backgrounds and the Passive RP's with their shops, offices, and other misc. services.