+- Limelight Forums (https://limelightgaming.net/forums)
+-- Forum: The Courthouse (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-198.html)
+--- Forum: Player Reports (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-209.html)
+---- Forum: Approved (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-213.html)
+---- Thread: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs (/thread-26796.html)
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - Astro2K - Jan 10, 2020
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - C Lee - Jan 10, 2020
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - Riggs - Jan 11, 2020
1, I’m “Riggs” not “Briggs”
2, it’s a government building I’m a police officer, so I do NOT need a search warrant to enter the government building, also you can’t put warrants on buildings such as nexus, fire department.
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - Riggs - Jan 11, 2020
For all I know IC is that you lied about it being broken down
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - Riggs - Jan 11, 2020
Quote:You could have used /me's and /it's with maybe some /roll to check the engine yourself but no.I’m expecting you guys to do some sort of /me Or /it
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - Astro2K - Jan 11, 2020
(Jan 11, 2020, 01:09 PM)Riggs Wrote: 1, I’m “Riggs” not “Briggs”
2, it’s a government building I’m a police officer, so I do NOT need a search warrant to enter the government building, also you can’t put warrants on buildings such as nexus, fire department.
1) wise words once spoken...
2) Fire stations are federally operated, unless your a federal officer your jurisdiction is way outside of the fire station.
(Jan 11, 2020, 01:11 PM)Riggs Wrote: For all I know IC is that you lied about it being broken down
What kind of a government official makes up such a lie, and why would a lowly police officer waste his time trying to resolve the situation by himself without consulting a higher-up, as if it was a lie that would mean the situation would be outside of your power to handle.
(Jan 11, 2020, 01:13 PM)Riggs Wrote:Quote:You could have used /me's and /it's with maybe some /roll to check the engine yourself but no.I’m expecting you guys to do some sort of /me Or /it
Point me to the rule that says not using /me or /it invalidates RP.
As far as i'm concerned telling you what was going on made the situation clear enough.
Can we cease this repetitive buffoonery and await a verdict.
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - Doctor Internet - Jan 11, 2020
Under Review
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - Doctor Internet - Jan 11, 2020
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - C Lee - Jan 11, 2020
Wasn't my truck. It was Astro's, there may have been a mix-up here as he was the chief.
However, I can answer that. It never blocked the doors at least when we used the station. We found out for the first time that them doors didn't open properly when it was shown to us (during this altercation), which may have been due to a prop we placed that caused the doors to not open correctly (that prop being the liquid)
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - Riggs - Jan 11, 2020
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - Doctor Internet - Jan 11, 2020
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - Riggs - Jan 11, 2020
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - Guv - Jan 12, 2020
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - Astro2K - Jan 12, 2020
(Jan 12, 2020, 01:59 PM)Guv Wrote: it was not what i was expecting was for the trucks to be parked in such a way that you cant hardly move through the station. so no permission was asked by me for the chief to place this. as i didn't deem it necessary at the time.
with regards to the FD towing there own vehicle. while all of this was taking place. we were standing in front of the First bay doors where The Chiefs Engine was parked. the rescue they were then using as the "only vehicle in service" nearly collided with all of us as he tried to get the front end of the vehicle into the bay to get his tow hook on. which i believe led to the retaliation of the police.
I hate to interject as I can see Doctor Internet is mediating a bit here by getting his own answers. But I can't stand idly by when I see baseless assumptions you can't prove being thrown about, which really doesn't help.
1 - I think its wrong to assume you can place your dupe just because we weren't there with our trucks.
2 - I disagree, the police were already handling the situation poorly with an assumed authoritative attitude, what with the passive-aggressive tone in radio/chat and heavy handedness. They had no reason to retaliate, police are peacekeepers, not to mention he warranted the engine for a search prior to us moving the rescue truck, he snapped and arrested two firefighters for "obstruction of justice" as you hear in the video.
RE: PR -> [L²:RP] Riggs - Doctor Internet - Jan 12, 2020
(Jan 12, 2020, 01:59 PM)Guv Wrote: which i believe led to the retaliation of the police.
So even with the quotes I posted before, you believe that the officer on scene had no predisposition to a certain outcome?