(May 8, 2018, 09:28 PM)Stell90 Wrote:

(May 8, 2018, 09:24 PM)ZooM Wrote:

(May 8, 2018, 09:20 PM)Stell90 Wrote: Please look at the time stamps that I gave you.

You had weapons pointed at you and you never followed the orders that they gave you.

Is that why I stood beside the police car as ordered but still got tased?

Yes, you got tased due to you failing to follow fear RP, as multiple times you were given orders by the cops to face the vehicles but failed to do so.

(May 8, 2018, 10:17 PM)Cole_ Wrote: In regards to the expansion of my previous message. You, and your SSA, break FearRP at multiple times in the video (see Stell's timestamps for proof). Let me also add a comment regarding your "there should be no conflict within the government comment", the Police can arrest the President so long as they have a valid enough reason (of which we had), the President is not above the law; no one is.

You was driving down the road in a 1980s RV of which then proceeded to ram an LEOs (Law Enforcement Officers) vehicle, you knew what you did wrong and is very clear in the video that we all had our lights and (some) sirens meaning that you should've stopped in the first place and should not have even attempted to move your vehicle, especially if you knew you had bad input lag at the time. This leads me onto my next part of this, once you'd finished ramming the vehicles into myself and another Officer we proceeded to pull you out of your vehicle, at which you, once again, can clearly see in the video failed to abide by FearRP for at least 4-5 seconds straight before you finally got out of the RV.

To add to that, in the second part of the video you can too blatantly see yourself and your SSA breaking FearRP. Multiple officers in the video, one of them being myself, told the three of you an excessive amount of times to face the vehicle yet you failed to face it for a majority of the situation. I fail to see any sort of redemption for your actions in this UBR but to try and turn it onto the punishing member of staff and the other Police Officer's hands.

(May 8, 2018, 10:51 PM)Cole_ Wrote: @ZooM, can you provide evidence of this "fact" you are claiming I am wrong about? As I am seeing multiple websites state the same thing on the website to the answer of the question "Does the President have immunity from prosecution?"; No.

Limelight - Link watcher

You're about to enter the following site: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-07-31/a-sitting-president-can-t-be-prosecuted Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-07-31/a-sitting-president-can-t-be-prosecuted

Limelight - Link watcher

You're about to enter the following site: https://www.quora.com/Does-a-sitting-President-have-any-immunity-from-prosecution Please note: You should only visit trusted sites. We are not responsible for any loss of your privacy.

https://www.quora.com/Does-a-sitting-President-have-any-immunity-from-prosecution
And a member of the administrative team.

(May 9, 2018, 08:00 AM)Cole_ Wrote: “The US President needs to be found guilty of said crimes BEFORE he is impeached. At the time of his impeachment, he can then be prosecuted for those crimes.” In our gamemode’s words, basically find him guilty of a crime.

(May 9, 2018, 02:43 PM)ZooM Wrote:

(May 9, 2018, 08:00 AM)Cole_ Wrote: “The US President needs to be found guilty of said crimes BEFORE he is impeached. At the time of his impeachment, he can then be prosecuted for those crimes.” In our gamemode’s words, basically find him guilty of a crime.

Wallah kom till arlöv ibn kahpa din orm

(May 8, 2018, 10:58 PM)Stell90 Wrote: Zoom

Can you explain to me, why you were using 3rd party software to command your SSA when you were under fear RP.

(May 8, 2018, 08:56 PM)Stell90 Wrote: Thank you, for posting an unban request Zoom. My following points will explain the reasoning behind your ban that I made yesterday. As well as a point at the end explaining why you have a permanent suspension


~0:20

The cop to your left has a gun out. Yes, it maybe on safety but as rule 2.1 informs you that you do not need your gun to be aimed at an officer for fear RP to be applied.


At ~0:33

You are breaking 3.9, as you are under fear RP yet telling your SSA to arrest the cop who is pointing a gun at you.


At 1:16

As I told you it was confirmed that Fear RP was still enabled as you didn't move straight away when this happened.
If you felt that your life was in such major danger you would of ran at that moment in time.


From 1:16-36

I can not tell what is going on as all your friends are talking in discord which is breaking 3.9 as they are under fear RP and are unable to use their radio in this scenario.


2:29

This is not prop push, as they are attempting to save Cole from the RV, the chair accidentally hit your RV. Don't see an issue here about that.



3:00

The SSA was posing a threat towards the police chief due to his aggressive behavior towards him.


3:29

Sours gave you an order to face the vehicle, I believe he said this a few seconds before hand as well. But, due to you and your friends talking I can not make this out.


3:56
Cherno is breaking fear RP and as such is hit by a baton.


At some point you mentioned how they had no reason to arrest you. But, due to you ramming vehicles and risking officers and the public's lives. I can see a valid reason for them doing so. You could also argue that you are corrupt as you are failing to respond to orders.


Thought the whole video which you have posted you have failed to follow fear RP several times all of you. And, I see no excuse for these actions that you have committed.

The ban was extended by @nightmare was because you had a last chance issued by @Nacreas. This is why you currently have a permanent ban.



Can you explain to me why you broke fear RP on multiple occasions during this clip?