![]() |
CityRP Police Temporary Chain of Command - Printable Version +- Limelight Forums (https://limelightgaming.net/forums) +-- Forum: Feedback (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-612.html) +--- Forum: Suggestions (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-239.html) +---- Forum: Finished (https://limelightgaming.net/forums/forum-242.html) +---- Thread: CityRP Police Temporary Chain of Command (/thread-19398.html) |
RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - Doctor Internet - Jan 24, 2018 (Jan 24, 2018, 02:26 AM)Monkey Wrote:(Jan 24, 2018, 01:26 AM)Doctor Internet Wrote:(Jan 24, 2018, 12:39 AM)Monkey Wrote: Too realistic for Limelight. We're already cops and robbers half the time. RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - Monkey - Jan 24, 2018 (Jan 24, 2018, 02:33 AM)Doctor Internet Wrote:(Jan 24, 2018, 02:26 AM)Monkey Wrote:(Jan 24, 2018, 01:26 AM)Doctor Internet Wrote:(Jan 24, 2018, 12:39 AM)Monkey Wrote: Too realistic for Limelight. Alright well it would need to be changed, but Limelight, to me, is a place where the RP experience should be spread out across all jobs and have the most RP availability to players. Stressing on government is different then what I think it should be. If we were to stress the government RP experience, we would need to stress created more RP opportunities for regular Citizens and other dealers. RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - Soviethooves - Jan 24, 2018 (Jan 24, 2018, 02:50 AM)Monkey Wrote:(Jan 24, 2018, 02:33 AM)Doctor Internet Wrote:(Jan 24, 2018, 02:26 AM)Monkey Wrote:(Jan 24, 2018, 01:26 AM)Doctor Internet Wrote:(Jan 24, 2018, 12:39 AM)Monkey Wrote: Too realistic for Limelight. This isn’t really stressing anything. Of anything, it’s a huge mistake on the Government structure tbh. SWAT usually falls as a team in the PD. The Police Sgt is in charge of the PD. Wouldn’t it make sense for the guy in charge of the PD not be in charge of supervising a team under his department? And you are welcome to suggest ways to improve RP opportunities for citizens. I don’t see how a slight CoC fix stops you. RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - Insert - Jan 24, 2018 +Support Would create more unity in the law enforcement. Also realistic. RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - Da Cool Cow - Jan 24, 2018 (Jan 23, 2018, 10:50 PM)The Captain Wrote: Considering the SWAT are a police unit IRL then I don't see why the Chief of the police shouldn't have control over them ingame. RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - Lord Octagon - Jan 24, 2018 (Jan 24, 2018, 02:26 AM)Monkey Wrote: because Limelight is a semi-serious server. Here we go again... The weakest argument in the history of LL suggestions. +Support but needs PD whitelist. RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - Nebula - Jan 24, 2018 (Jan 23, 2018, 11:28 PM)Constrictor Wrote:Yes, you're right. I am laughing everytime I see my profile. Dang you know me well.(Jan 23, 2018, 10:33 PM)Nebula Wrote: -support RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - Jokhah - Jan 24, 2018 -Support Police Sergeant and SWAT Sergeant are the same rank regardless of how you look at it. One shouldn't be telling the other jack shit in terms of what to do or how to do it. Perhaps instead you could suggest adding in a Police Chief/Captain job, (make him a vip job if you want) that would be the central point of control for the police/SWAT. That makes a lot more sense. RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - Lord Octagon - Jan 24, 2018 (Jan 24, 2018, 01:12 PM)Jokhah Wrote: -Support https://limelightgaming.net/forums/thread-9295.html Over 80% support from the community, shot down by staff with "no feedback provided". RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - ForceGhost - Jan 24, 2018 (Jan 24, 2018, 03:14 PM)Lord Octagon Wrote:(Jan 24, 2018, 01:12 PM)Jokhah Wrote: -Support Yeah, that thread was very positive with a lot of great suggestions and ideas within it. Could we possible have a reason why no feedback was provided? As it may help us understand for future suggestions. @Doctor Internet RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - Soviethooves - Jan 24, 2018 Would be nice to hear why it was denied so I can fix it or change anything that was deemed not worth a vote. RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - Doctor Internet - Jan 24, 2018 (Jan 24, 2018, 03:14 PM)Lord Octagon Wrote:(Jan 24, 2018, 01:12 PM)Jokhah Wrote: -Support (Jan 24, 2018, 03:34 PM)ForceGhost Wrote:(Jan 24, 2018, 03:14 PM)Lord Octagon Wrote:(Jan 24, 2018, 01:12 PM)Jokhah Wrote: -Support (Jan 24, 2018, 03:48 PM)Gungranny Wrote: Would be nice to hear why it was denied so I can fix it or change anything that was deemed not worth a vote. Those who -supported failed to give a reason. Requesting input from @developer @admin @superadmin. RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - Bambo - Jan 24, 2018 During the Serious RP night, the police worked extremely nice. True, we are a semi-serious roleplay server but that also means some parts of our server can be serious in a way. This allows a more professional police team to exist. We can find a balanced way to do this fitting our server. I'm assuming consequences of IC actions will also be heavier. + Support RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - Soviethooves - Jan 24, 2018 If I can ask @Doctor Internet, who -Supported? And I know this isn't the place, but why is it that when something gets Staff Reviewed, why is it not required to give a reasoning for them not supporting? Regular players push for it so much from other players (including me), yet during the final step of the actual yay or nay motion, they can just click a button and not share their criticism? RE: Police Temporary Chain of Command - Doctor Internet - Jan 24, 2018 (Jan 24, 2018, 07:17 PM)Gungranny Wrote: If I can ask @Doctor Internet, who -Supported? Under instructions from HR, I am not allowed to divulge that information. (Jan 24, 2018, 07:17 PM)Gungranny Wrote: And I know this isn't the place, but why is it that when something gets Staff Reviewed, why is it not required to give a reasoning for them not supporting? Regular players push for it so much from other players (including me), yet during the final step of the actual yay or nay motion, they can just click a button and not share their criticism?That was prior to policies being implemented and enforced. -supporters are now required to give reasons for their -support, which are posted on the public thread. |