Limelight Forums

Full Version: PR -> Josh_roady
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Reported Players: Josh_roady (STEAM_0:1:211190693)  ()
Server: EU Live
Time: 2020-Feb-09 16:11
Summary: I'm just using some evidence, of another PR, cause I see a rule breakage.
Uses third person glitch, to get an unfair and totally unrealistic advantage (cheating, imo, does it multiple times, which is lead to believe).
In case he deletes the evidence, I got a recovery.
Evidence: https://youtu.be/wOlgdKEXCOY

His using it at
0:55, 1:36, 2:48
in that exact footage when my view glitches through the wall i litteraly say its an accident and none of this affects and IC actions i take so therefore theres no metagaming

*edit* i just rewatched that video it doesnt have my speech as they are different audio tracks i will re-upload it and post a new link to provide some acctual context
Accident doing it 3 times in long distances, I dont think so, you're intentions was obvious malicous.
You were being raided, and you intentionally knew it, but woudnt matter anyways, as its still very unfair either way.

Rule - 1.1
abusing 3rd person and using other third party software to give yourself an advantage over other players

please tell me how this gave an unfair advantage it never influenced any decisions never gave me any advantages in a shoot out and it never showed the position of anyone to me 
But your intentions was to and you still abused it multiple times. 
Anyway I wont be the guy deciding it and I wont be arguing anymore, in case you delete the evidence, here is the evidence again.
https://youtu.be/wOlgdKEXCOY
(Feb 9, 2020, 07:16 PM)lampard Wrote: [ -> ] here is the evidence again.
https://youtu.be/wOlgdKEXCOY

well thanks for that but like i said i am re uploading it with what i am saying for full context dont try to take away the context
i wouldnt go uploading other peoples footage as some people might be toxic and get you a copyright strike

here is the footage with speech https://youtu.be/9UO5T2Faz_o
(Feb 9, 2020, 07:30 PM)josh roady Wrote: [ -> ]i wouldnt go uploading other peoples footage as some people might be toxic and get you a copyright strike
It's evidence and im deleting it right after the case is closed.
It's used for a purpose, not to gain money but for evidence.

The video u send is useless, imo.
(Feb 9, 2020, 07:32 PM)lampard Wrote: [ -> ]The video u send is useless, imo.
https://youtu.be/9UO5T2Faz_o well is set as unlisted you should be able to see it 

now im going to lay this out

[font=Roboto, sans-serif,]1.1 - Using cheats, hacks, abusing glitches, abusing 3rd person and using other third party software to give yourself an advantage over other players (such as autoclickers) is not allowed.[/font]
3.9 - Do not use information obtained by out-of-character means, in-character (Metagaming)

we knew they where there from sounds i never saw anyone though a window and that would not have had any affect on IC knewleded i was wonder why tf there was toold guns and jumping as we belived to be in a situation where we where being meta gamed the point in that was to record anything they did hence why i was recording and it was put in a PR 

non of the information i gained from being in third person the only information i got was they are police 

that doesn't affect any decision i make IC to have a shoot out i would have if they where police or not 

so therefore this had no affect on the IC situation and looking through a window OOC that has no affect on my characters knowledge so i can try and catch them prop climbing to get probable cause isn't gaining any unfair advantage in the situation and as that is what the rule states i dont believe i can be in violation of it
Let the staff decide.
(Feb 9, 2020, 07:45 PM)lampard Wrote: [ -> ]Let the staff decide.

well that is the point in this i just dont want you speaking for my intentions without understanding the situation
So from looking at the footage, you looked through the wall multiple times throughout the clip which gave you an advantage as you'd know the moment when police were to breach into your building.

As such, I'll be issuing you with a warning as it didn't directly affect the outcome of the situation as you weren't at the door at the time of the breach.