Dec 9, 2019, 10:19 PM
Dec 10, 2019, 12:23 AM
To quote the article you mention.
"Radicalised mothers with children who've seen no other life".
It's pretty extreme to suggest the murder of (at least) 10,000 people, many of whom have only committed the "crime" of having radicalised parents.
That seems pretty extreme to me.
Disagree with their religious views, sure.
Disagree with what they do, sure.
Disagree with the IS, and their membership of it, sure.
But to call for their deaths? That's crossing the line, aye?
"Radicalised mothers with children who've seen no other life".
It's pretty extreme to suggest the murder of (at least) 10,000 people, many of whom have only committed the "crime" of having radicalised parents.
That seems pretty extreme to me.
Disagree with their religious views, sure.
Disagree with what they do, sure.
Disagree with the IS, and their membership of it, sure.
But to call for their deaths? That's crossing the line, aye?
Dec 13, 2019, 11:01 PM
(Dec 10, 2019, 12:23 AM)Doctor Internet Wrote: [ -> ]To quote the article you mention.
"Radicalised mothers with children who've seen no other life".
It's pretty extreme to suggest the murder of (at least) 10,000 people, many of whom have only committed the "crime" of having radicalised parents.
That seems pretty extreme to me.
Disagree with their religious views, sure.
Disagree with what they do, sure.
Disagree with the IS, and their membership of it, sure.
But to call for their deaths?
It is quite drastic what you interpret into a rhetorical statement. I did not write that we should execute them all one by one, and saying I "called for their deaths", that is extreme.
I still do not see how it is "extremism" at all. Maybe a harsh sentence, maybe a bit over the top, but definitely no extremism.
Dec 14, 2019, 09:17 AM
(Dec 13, 2019, 11:01 PM)Nudelsalat im Panzer Wrote: [ -> ](Dec 10, 2019, 12:23 AM)Doctor Internet Wrote: [ -> ]To quote the article you mention.
"Radicalised mothers with children who've seen no other life".
It's pretty extreme to suggest the murder of (at least) 10,000 people, many of whom have only committed the "crime" of having radicalised parents.
That seems pretty extreme to me.
Disagree with their religious views, sure.
Disagree with what they do, sure.
Disagree with the IS, and their membership of it, sure.
But to call for their deaths?
It is quite drastic what you interpret into a rhetorical statement. I did not write that we should execute them all one by one, and saying I "called for their deaths", that is extreme.
I still do not see how it is "extremism" at all. Maybe a harsh sentence, maybe a bit over the top, but definitely no extremism.
"I don't think they should die, only that they should have high explosives dropped on them"
Dec 18, 2019, 02:03 PM
Unless there's something else I've missed, or any further comments, this appeal will be concluded tomorrow.
Dec 19, 2019, 08:10 PM
Well, it's now tomorrow. Appeal concluded, warning will stand as issued.
Even though you claim there's a difference between wishing someone dead and having them bombed, I don''t really see the difference.
Again, disagreeing with people is fine, but your post crossed the line.
Even though you claim there's a difference between wishing someone dead and having them bombed, I don''t really see the difference.
Again, disagreeing with people is fine, but your post crossed the line.