(Jul 26, 2019, 01:28 AM)Jeff Ford Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 25, 2019, 07:14 PM)ForceGhost Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 25, 2019, 07:03 PM)Judge Rage Wrote: [ -> ]Woah, you lot know how fearRP works?
Yeppers. Sit in car with gun in hand, cops tell you to get out of car, get out of car with gun in hand, shoot cops, profit????
Rule 2.4 - You are not under FearRP if you are also visibly armed. Visibly armed in the context of FearRP means that you have your weapon out and in your hands, regardless of safety mode. You are not considered visibly armed when you are seated in a vehicle, regardless of whether you are holding a weapon in hand or not.
Oof.
(Jul 26, 2019, 01:28 AM)Jeff Ford Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 25, 2019, 07:14 PM)ForceGhost Wrote: [ -> ]Yeppers. Sit in car with gun in hand, cops tell you to get out of car, get out of car with gun in hand, shoot cops, profit????
Rule 2.4 - You are not under FearRP if you are also visibly armed. Visibly armed in the context of FearRP means that you have your weapon out and in your hands, regardless of safety mode. You are not considered visibly armed when you are seated in a vehicle, regardless of whether you are holding a weapon in hand or not.
Oof.
I believe you may need to learn some basic reading comprehension. Let me help you by underlining the key information. I can also find you some worksheets or activities to do online if you need more help in your quest for knowledge.
Here's a fantastic link, I'm sure you'll find something to assist you with brushing up your reading skills.
I Wrote:Sit in car with gun in hand, cops tell you to get out of car, get out of car with gun in hand, shoot cops, profit
Overlewd Wrote:When you get out of the car, you remain under FearRP if you were previously under FearRP regardless of where glitchy seats may have ejected you in, but not if you had weapons equipped (in which case you get out with a weapon already out, therefore you become immediately immune to FearRP by the rule and did not break it as you did not consciously switch weapons while under FearRP).
Here's also another one of our old favorite spots. I remember used to turn his car around and run away whenever we drove up the hill of doom.
(Jul 26, 2019, 04:42 AM)ForceGhost Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 26, 2019, 01:28 AM)Jeff Ford Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 25, 2019, 07:14 PM)ForceGhost Wrote: [ -> ]Yeppers. Sit in car with gun in hand, cops tell you to get out of car, get out of car with gun in hand, shoot cops, profit????
Rule 2.4 - You are not under FearRP if you are also visibly armed. Visibly armed in the context of FearRP means that you have your weapon out and in your hands, regardless of safety mode. You are not considered visibly armed when you are seated in a vehicle, regardless of whether you are holding a weapon in hand or not.
Oof.
I believe you may need to learn some basic reading comprehension. Let me help you by underlining the key information. I can also find you some worksheets or activities to do online if you need more help in your quest for knowledge. Here's a fantastic link, I'm sure you'll find something to assist you with brushing up your reading skills.
I Wrote:Sit in car with gun in hand, cops tell you to get out of car, get out of car with gun in hand, shoot cops, profit
Overlewd Wrote:When you get out of the car, you remain under FearRP if you were previously under FearRP regardless of where glitchy seats may have ejected you in, but not if you had weapons equipped (in which case you get out with a weapon already out, therefore you become immediately immune to FearRP by the rule and did not break it as you did not consciously switch weapons while under FearRP).
Ooh! A Loophole! Thank you!
(Jul 26, 2019, 01:06 PM)Jeff Ford Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 26, 2019, 04:42 AM)ForceGhost Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 26, 2019, 01:28 AM)Jeff Ford Wrote: [ -> ]Rule 2.4 - You are not under FearRP if you are also visibly armed. Visibly armed in the context of FearRP means that you have your weapon out and in your hands, regardless of safety mode. You are not considered visibly armed when you are seated in a vehicle, regardless of whether you are holding a weapon in hand or not.
Oof.
I believe you may need to learn some basic reading comprehension. Let me help you by underlining the key information. I can also find you some worksheets or activities to do online if you need more help in your quest for knowledge. Here's a fantastic link, I'm sure you'll find something to assist you with brushing up your reading skills.
I Wrote:Sit in car with gun in hand, cops tell you to get out of car, get out of car with gun in hand, shoot cops, profit
Overlewd Wrote:When you get out of the car, you remain under FearRP if you were previously under FearRP regardless of where glitchy seats may have ejected you in, but not if you had weapons equipped (in which case you get out with a weapon already out, therefore you become immediately immune to FearRP by the rule and did not break it as you did not consciously switch weapons while under FearRP).
Ooh! A Loophole! Thank you!
I don't think you can call a HR written clarification a loophole.
(Jul 26, 2019, 04:47 AM)ForceGhost Wrote: [ -> ]Here's also another one of our old favorite spots. I remember used to turn his car around and run away whenever we drove up the hill of doom.
Indeed I did - because then, when you got too big for your boots, you'd come back down the hill and me and
would fuck you three right up! Good old days, eh?
(Jul 26, 2019, 01:12 PM)ForceGhost Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 26, 2019, 01:06 PM)Jeff Ford Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 26, 2019, 04:42 AM)ForceGhost Wrote: [ -> ]I believe you may need to learn some basic reading comprehension. Let me help you by underlining the key information. I can also find you some worksheets or activities to do online if you need more help in your quest for knowledge. Here's a fantastic link, I'm sure you'll find something to assist you with brushing up your reading skills.
Ooh! A Loophole! Thank you!
I don't think you can call a HR written clarification a loophole.
Well technically I can. Since it is, a Loophole. Oh well.
(Jul 26, 2019, 01:41 PM)Jeff Ford Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 26, 2019, 01:12 PM)ForceGhost Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 26, 2019, 01:06 PM)Jeff Ford Wrote: [ -> ]Ooh! A Loophole! Thank you!
I don't think you can call a HR written clarification a loophole.
Well technically I can. Since it is, a Loophole. Oh well.
If you feel it's a loophole then make a staff report on
for creating a loophole to allow the Limelight Elite to benefit from it.
Yeah because HR clarifications on rules are loopholes, I forgot. Honestly what a stupid comment, if it’s been clarified by HR how on earth is it a loophole? You need to go look up the definition of a loophole.
(Jul 26, 2019, 01:53 PM)ForceGhost Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 26, 2019, 01:41 PM)Jeff Ford Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 26, 2019, 01:12 PM)ForceGhost Wrote: [ -> ]I don't think you can call a HR written clarification a loophole.
Well technically I can. Since it is, a Loophole. Oh well.
If you feel it's a loophole then make a staff report on for creating a loophole to allow the Limelight Elite to benefit from it.
At least you admitted to it.
(Jul 26, 2019, 02:48 PM)Jeff Ford Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 26, 2019, 01:53 PM)ForceGhost Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 26, 2019, 01:41 PM)Jeff Ford Wrote: [ -> ]Well technically I can. Since it is, a Loophole. Oh well.
"If you feel it's a loophole" then make a staff report on for creating a loophole to allow the Limelight Elite to benefit from it.
At least you admitted to it.
So what you are saying
is the whole Rule clarification thread is full of explained loopholes?!
(Jul 26, 2019, 03:50 PM)Zaidplays Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 26, 2019, 02:48 PM)Jeff Ford Wrote: [ -> ] (Jul 26, 2019, 01:53 PM)ForceGhost Wrote: [ -> ]"If you feel it's a loophole" then make a staff report on for creating a loophole to allow the Limelight Elite to benefit from it.
At least you admitted to it.
So what you are saying is the whole Rule clarification thread is full of explained loopholes?!
Only for the Elite!
I think we should end the ‘fighting talk’ and just give it a rest. If you all carry it on I’ll just close the thread, no need for the constant bickering
(Jul 26, 2019, 05:28 PM)Brynn Wrote: [ -> ]I think we should end the ‘fighting talk’ and just give it a rest. If you all carry it on I’ll just close the thread, no need for the constant bickering
Were you expecting a serious thread from them, sir?
![[Image: BpjMtHr.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/BpjMtHr.jpg)