Limelight Forums

Full Version: Doctor Internet
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Your Steam Name: IVNT

Time/Date: 11:20

Your Steam ID: Not needed, forum reason

Name of Staff Member:  

Summary/Details: Removed something invalidly abusing his powers to do so.

Evidence: Image rule 6 clearly states this one thing: [Image: VHxspaR.png]
Despite it being minor, doctor internet removed the evidence that was being used in the courthouse for some unknown reason despite it not being a rulebreakage. There was no valid reason to remove the video. 

The video removed is here: <evidence made private>

The evidence of video gone :
[Image: UpHjxnY.png]
[Image: 406b69cebb909aa437f4dc10abf22e26.png]

It was moved to a hidden post. Staff can still see it.
(Jul 24, 2018, 12:40 PM)Doctor Internet Wrote: [ -> ][Image: 406b69cebb909aa437f4dc10abf22e26.png]

It was moved to a hidden post. Staff can still see it.

Yet it didn't need to be as it was public evidence as the rule said it can stay public.
(Jul 24, 2018, 12:42 PM)IVNT Wrote: [ -> ]
(Jul 24, 2018, 12:40 PM)Doctor Internet Wrote: [ -> ][Image: 406b69cebb909aa437f4dc10abf22e26.png]

It was moved to a hidden post. Staff can still see it.

Yet it didn't need to be as it was public evidence as the rule said it can stay public.

The rule says you are allowed to post it as evidence without getting punished for it. It does not say anything about it having to stay public.
Anyway, concluded. The evidence was not removed but made private. The rule does not mean the evidence has to stay public after being posted. Therefore, no abuse noted.